But I will say I see a lot of devs/dev teams sell out and move on.
Speculation gimmicks of whatever.
I do like to see a ton of coins try there algo's and how they hold up.
"Not forking" or whatever. Maybe we are paving the way for the futures of money or science.
Who knows
At the end of the day if we all look at these coins as what they are "open source" projects instead of my coin or his coin
I think that would create a better environment for the new commers.
I get tired of reading spam trolls spreading FUD everywhere pounding there chest about being a senior member. That doesn't help anyone, it just clutters the forum.
So yea if we spent a little more time scratching our heads together maybe they can all work one way or another.
Thanks. I think you make a good point here that I'm a little surprised more people don't agree with. Yes, a ridiculous number of coins have been created, and most of them are clones that die out after a few weeks or months. But there is a lot of innovation taking place. And while most of the coins that include some novel idea won't themselves survive, the ideas do. As long as the whole area of cryptocurrencies doesn't die out, I think we will eventually start to see some more "professional" coins emerge that bundle together a lot of these innovations to make some really good currencies that are better than Bitcoin. Either that or some of the major coins like Bitcoin will be modified to incorporate some of the better ideas.