Pages:
Author

Topic: What do you want to see in casino reviews? - page 7. (Read 4849 times)

hero member
Activity: 2044
Merit: 784
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
You can check the pros and cons listed if you want to have a quick look at the negative side of the casino. It is indeed better to read some negative unfiltered reviews so you know what to expect when you try it yourself. But we can't expect every review site to get a glimpse of their actual experience because not many of them are providing comprehensive review of the games. Because you will need a lot of bankroll if you do really want to try those games. And most of the time, they have limited bankroll to begin with.
Unfiltered reviews are good to prevent having an inaccurate opinion based on biased reviews written by people who are directly connected to the casino or are paid to write such positive reviews. On the other hand, we should never disconsider the possibility of negative reviews about a casino being in fact a revenge from gamblers in loss against the casino where they have been losing money. So, they might accuse the casino of shady acts, although nothing they say is true, since they are just accusing the casino because they are mad for having lost money.

I have already seen this kind of accusation against reputable and trusted crypto casinos on this forum. And when it happens it's really problematic, because the gambler becomes a hater of the casino, becoming obsessed about ruining its reputation through repetitive attempts and persecutions. The issue is that a naive gambler can take those accusations seriously and avoid playing at a legit casino for the wrong reasons...
legendary
Activity: 3122
Merit: 1102
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
I agree, reviews should not be trusted just from one source because each reviewer has very different beliefs than us, sometimes they may consider a very good casino based on very general characteristics , and sometimes it seems as if they adhere to a format in which To say some things , I think a reviewer should be very specific, review each casino in detail and give a lot of things to know, because that is what we Experience as players and when we play we want the best gaming experience. So reviewing many reviewers is a good option, but nothing like doing our own research, because sometimes they don't review the games, only a few, the most popular ones , so tastes can vary there, because a reviewer can review a slot, but he doesn't review them. everyone, it's a lot of Work and a lot of money, so this is the only thing to consider, always have these reviewers as a guide.

Reading more than 1 review is better obviously because we can compare the review, if most reviewers say that a casino is good then high likely the casino is truly good. Of course we need to read reputable reviewers because there might be so many paid/fake review sites where the review is good because they are getting paid by the casinos. For me, I do like to find the negative side written in the review sites than reading the positive side first because because if I read the positive things first then it may lead me to forget the negative side.

You can check the pros and cons listed if you want to have a quick look at the negative side of the casino. It is indeed better to read some negative unfiltered reviews so you know what to expect when you try it yourself. But we can't expect every review site to get a glimpse of their actual experience because not many of them are providing comprehensive review of the games. Because you will need a lot of bankroll if you do really want to try those games. And most of the time, they have limited bankroll to begin with.
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1875
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Reading more than 1 review is better obviously because we can compare the review, if most reviewers say that a casino is good then high likely the casino is truly good. Of course we need to read reputable reviewers because there might be so many paid/fake review sites where the review is good because they are getting paid by the casinos. For me, I do like to find the negative side written in the review sites than reading the positive side first because because if I read the positive things first then it may lead me to forget the negative side.

Yes, it's really a good thing to look at, but in most of the reviews I've seen there are a lot of good things, in some cases they have a box where they say minimum withdrawal, if they have the fee, how much is it? the quantity, all these things, of course I have not seen a review where they talk about each game and its experience, although it would be a good thing, for example on the freebitco.in site, they have a very common and very original dice game and this can mean that when comparing it with other games on other sites like primedice, stake.com or other sites to draw other conclusions, such as saying that on that site that each player has favorite games that are different from the others.

sr. member
Activity: 2604
Merit: 338
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
I agree, reviews should not be trusted just from one source because each reviewer has very different beliefs than us, sometimes they may consider a very good casino based on very general characteristics , and sometimes it seems as if they adhere to a format in which To say some things , I think a reviewer should be very specific, review each casino in detail and give a lot of things to know, because that is what we Experience as players and when we play we want the best gaming experience. So reviewing many reviewers is a good option, but nothing like doing our own research, because sometimes they don't review the games, only a few, the most popular ones , so tastes can vary there, because a reviewer can review a slot, but he doesn't review them. everyone, it's a lot of Work and a lot of money, so this is the only thing to consider, always have these reviewers as a guide.

Reading more than 1 review is better obviously because we can compare the review, if most reviewers say that a casino is good then high likely the casino is truly good. Of course we need to read reputable reviewers because there might be so many paid/fake review sites where the review is good because they are getting paid by the casinos. For me, I do like to find the negative side written in the review sites than reading the positive side first because because if I read the positive things first then it may lead me to forget the negative side.
I also believe that negative reviews are the most valuable because there we can find a reason why we simply will not even enter this casino. If we do not discover this in advance, then in fact it will be a great disappointment for us to discover it ourselves, besides we will simply waste time on registration and other actions. Negative reviews can also be far-fetched, because the player could not be very lucky and lose money, so you need to understand that he can also leave negative reviews, but they will not be justified in any way, because he will simply be offended by this particular casino. To summarize, I want to say that reviews today are not the best guide, but there are still real ones, you just need to be able to find them among all the others.
But we should really be careful on trying out to read up some negative reviews since it could really be faked out or something that would really false because we know that when it comes to information that we could be able to read up online then its not all the time that it would be the truth. There would really be competitors who would really be trying out to destroy others reputation on which they would really be
giving out some false feedbacks. This is why on the time that you would really be able to read up some negative feedback then it would be best that you should really be looking for something more and you would really be that verifying whether it does have that legit feedbacks or issues on which this is something on where you would really be basing up your decision whether you would proceed or you would be
finding for another place.
legendary
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1183
I agree, reviews should not be trusted just from one source because each reviewer has very different beliefs than us, sometimes they may consider a very good casino based on very general characteristics , and sometimes it seems as if they adhere to a format in which To say some things , I think a reviewer should be very specific, review each casino in detail and give a lot of things to know, because that is what we Experience as players and when we play we want the best gaming experience. So reviewing many reviewers is a good option, but nothing like doing our own research, because sometimes they don't review the games, only a few, the most popular ones , so tastes can vary there, because a reviewer can review a slot, but he doesn't review them. everyone, it's a lot of Work and a lot of money, so this is the only thing to consider, always have these reviewers as a guide.

Reading more than 1 review is better obviously because we can compare the review, if most reviewers say that a casino is good then high likely the casino is truly good. Of course we need to read reputable reviewers because there might be so many paid/fake review sites where the review is good because they are getting paid by the casinos. For me, I do like to find the negative side written in the review sites than reading the positive side first because because if I read the positive things first then it may lead me to forget the negative side.
I also believe that negative reviews are the most valuable because there we can find a reason why we simply will not even enter this casino. If we do not discover this in advance, then in fact it will be a great disappointment for us to discover it ourselves, besides we will simply waste time on registration and other actions. Negative reviews can also be far-fetched, because the player could not be very lucky and lose money, so you need to understand that he can also leave negative reviews, but they will not be justified in any way, because he will simply be offended by this particular casino. To summarize, I want to say that reviews today are not the best guide, but there are still real ones, you just need to be able to find them among all the others.
legendary
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1312
I agree, reviews should not be trusted just from one source because each reviewer has very different beliefs than us, sometimes they may consider a very good casino based on very general characteristics , and sometimes it seems as if they adhere to a format in which To say some things , I think a reviewer should be very specific, review each casino in detail and give a lot of things to know, because that is what we Experience as players and when we play we want the best gaming experience. So reviewing many reviewers is a good option, but nothing like doing our own research, because sometimes they don't review the games, only a few, the most popular ones , so tastes can vary there, because a reviewer can review a slot, but he doesn't review them. everyone, it's a lot of Work and a lot of money, so this is the only thing to consider, always have these reviewers as a guide.

Reading more than 1 review is better obviously because we can compare the review, if most reviewers say that a casino is good then high likely the casino is truly good. Of course we need to read reputable reviewers because there might be so many paid/fake review sites where the review is good because they are getting paid by the casinos. For me, I do like to find the negative side written in the review sites than reading the positive side first because because if I read the positive things first then it may lead me to forget the negative side.
hero member
Activity: 952
Merit: 555
We can use a positive review as a judge in this case, since we all know that reviews can be manipulated, but when we have a platform like this which is reliable and a review is been conducted, such can be taken as valid because the members of the community have tasted the bit of what they offers and are given a genuine review on that, also the use of kyc or not doesn't make the review on a particular platform valid or invalid, that is just be the way, we have that to only includes from the requirements on their gambling policies.

I don't care whether the reviews are positive or negative, the first concern for me is that the reviews are real and not manipulated one or paid ones. No matter how much trusted the casino is, you will get a mixture of good and bad reviews (though good reviews will be more) and that is the best to judge the platform and know what its strengths and what are its weak points.

If ever I develop any casino review site, I will allow a section where the gamblers are allowed to post freely and those comments are published on the site without being censored or edited. This will help to know the true feedback of the casino site.

You're right, what we should first set focus on is on how the review appears being a genuine one or not, since people can have different means to ensure that they manipulate for this, we need to be very careful while going through some of these online reviews, also, we have to be more considerate, what i mean is for us to have more than one means of making our review confirmation to ascertain the ground that the first one received is not fake and none as well is not being manipulated.
full member
Activity: 2520
Merit: 204
OrangeFren.com
Greetings to all forum users!

I own a casino review website. I, like many people here, am already tired of the same type of basic casino reviews, which I have done myself, unfortunately.
it is better that you directly asked gamblers because with that you can seek more appropriate answers.

Quote
It's time for a change, and I want to write reviews that would be really interesting and useful to gamblers.

There are a lot of experienced gamblers on this forum, so I decided to ask you what you would like to see in casino reviews.
that is right , there are lot of gamblers experienced and newbies here in this forum.

Quote
I would be grateful if you could share your thoughts on this and answer these questions:

1. Do you read casino reviews?

2. Do you find any casino reviews useful? If so, please share some examples of good casino reviews that you find useful.

3. What should a casino review contain to make you read it?

4. I've already tried to write reviews that I find useful.  If you have the opportunity, please share your thoughts on them: WolfBet Review and LTC Casino Review

5. Additionally, please share any thoughts you have on the topic of casino reviews.


Thank you all in advance for your attention and time. I would be happy to discuss this topic with anyone who wants to.


Better to have the most and very important thing that gamblers mostly seek for best approach
and that is the 24/7 support with accurate answers and directly addressing the issue without leaving
the problem unanswered .
legendary
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1875
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform

Also, the sentiment of the reviewers matters too, since you can't check review sites on the reviews written about 10 different casinos and they are always the same. That means something must be wrong somewhere, which I know could be because of the money paid or just a sentiment about the casinos by the writers of the reviews. This is also the reason why everything we read as reviews should be averaged, and before this can be done, we must read reviews from many sources and not trust a single source to avoid being the victim of the two factors that could influence reviews.

I agree, reviews should not be trusted just from one source because each reviewer has very different beliefs than us, sometimes they may consider a very good casino based on very general characteristics , and sometimes it seems as if they adhere to a format in which To say some things , I think a reviewer should be very specific, review each casino in detail and give a lot of things to know, because that is what we Experience as players and when we play we want the best gaming experience. So reviewing many reviewers is a good option, but nothing like doing our own research, because sometimes they don't review the games, only a few, the most popular ones , so tastes can vary there, because a reviewer can review a slot, but he doesn't review them. everyone, it's a lot of Work and a lot of money, so this is the only thing to consider, always have these reviewers as a guide.
hero member
Activity: 826
Merit: 641
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
Casino reviews are very important for their user. New users find a lot of information about the game and website. The review contains a full map of any Casino platform, website performance deposit withdrawal, and bat gaming slot Spain. Everyone should read carefully casino review. It helps the new user to make the right decision about the casino site. payment method is very important for any casino. Easy payment and withdrawal system like a lot of customers. A lot of casino owners make fake reviews. You should check and try to save your money from scammers. A review is important for online casinos.
Yes, a user can learn a lot about a casino site from a review site. So a review site should write about the important aspects of a casino site in detail. these can be about Kyc, about vpn, about support services, bonus relations and many other facilities. Now in the online world there are many review sites in which other sites give ratings in exchange of money.  So before trusting a website one should have a good idea about the review site to see if it is reportable or not
Your concluding part is good in this kind of arrangement and will never trust a reviewing site that was all written by the owner of the website. No matter how good or pretending they can be, I can't trust them because that site was actually created for such a purpose, it is all about making money, so what do you expect? In some cases, the website could compare the casinos together in the form of rating them, but they trickily say better/best of their well-paid masters and carefully reduce the value of the better ones by their rating. This makes it awkward unless the review site is such that is being reviewed by external users where the truth can averagely be known.

Also, the sentiment of the reviewers matters too, since you can't check review sites on the reviews written about 10 different casinos and they are always the same. That means something must be wrong somewhere, which I know could be because of the money paid or just a sentiment about the casinos by the writers of the reviews. This is also the reason why everything we read as reviews should be averaged, and before this can be done, we must read reviews from many sources and not trust a single source to avoid being the victim of the two factors that could influence reviews.
sr. member
Activity: 1400
Merit: 420
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
Casino reviews are very important for their user. New users find a lot of information about the game and website. The review contains a full map of any Casino platform, website performance deposit withdrawal, and bat gaming slot Spain. Everyone should read carefully casino review. It helps the new user to make the right decision about the casino site. payment method is very important for any casino. Easy payment and withdrawal system like a lot of customers. A lot of casino owners make fake reviews. You should check and try to save your money from scammers. A review is important for online casinos.
Yes, a user can learn a lot about a casino site from a review site. So a review site should write about the important aspects of a casino site in detail. these can be about Kyc, about vpn, about support services, bonus relations and many other facilities. Now in the online world there are many review sites in which other sites give ratings in exchange of money.  So before trusting a website one should have a good idea about the review site to see if it is reportable or not
member
Activity: 86
Merit: 13
Greetings to all forum users!

I own a casino review website. I, like many people here, am already tired of the same type of basic casino reviews, which I have done myself, unfortunately.

It's time for a change, and I want to write reviews that would be really interesting and useful to gamblers.

There are a lot of experienced gamblers on this forum, so I decided to ask you what you would like to see in casino reviews.

I would be grateful if you could share your thoughts on this and answer these questions:

1. Do you read casino reviews?

2. Do you find any casino reviews useful? If so, please share some examples of good casino reviews that you find useful.

3. What should a casino review contain to make you read it?

4. I've already tried to write reviews that I find useful.  If you have the opportunity, please share your thoughts on them: WolfBet Review and LTC Casino Review

5. Additionally, please share any thoughts you have on the topic of casino reviews.


Thank you all in advance for your attention and time. I would be happy to discuss this topic with anyone who wants to.



Players prefer very detailed information, with emphasis on KYC procedures, deposit and withdrawal methods, bonuses, currencies, languages and 24/7 support.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1465
Casino reviews are very important for their user. New users find a lot of information about the game and website. The review contains a full map of any Casino platform, website performance deposit withdrawal, and bat gaming slot Spain. Everyone should read carefully casino review. It helps the new user to make the right decision about the casino site. payment method is very important for any casino. Easy payment and withdrawal system like a lot of customers. A lot of casino owners make fake reviews. You should check and try to save your money from scammers. A review is important for online casinos.
In my opinion, casino reviews, which are quite large texts  or, for example, long video material, are always written at the request of the casino itself or its competitrs, if the review contains something negative.  And it contains something that players may not like. 

But just imagine that a simple player would just sit and write a long review and not think at all that he would receive any money for this review.  If this happens, it is an exception and a rare case and this is not the rule at all. 
Therefore, in my opinion, more objective information can be obtained by reading, for example, the topics of the corresponding casino on our forum or on specialized forums dedicated to the discussion of gambling. 
Short posts from real players and the possible problems they encountered are largely understandable to those who read such topics.  By the way, it also becomes clear how the support of such casinos works, which is of course important in some situations.
sr. member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 250
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
Casino reviews are very important for their user. New users find a lot of information about the game and website. The review contains a full map of any Casino platform, website performance deposit withdrawal, and bat gaming slot Spain. Everyone should read carefully casino review. It helps the new user to make the right decision about the casino site. payment method is very important for any casino. Easy payment and withdrawal system like a lot of customers. A lot of casino owners make fake reviews. You should check and try to save your money from scammers. A review is important for online casinos.
hero member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 609
I want to believe that its not all the casino platforms that make reviews both the paid and non paid reviews because they may not have the capacity of affording to go for such for any reason best known to them, which am not in support of, because we must be able to get some feedback in what we offer to the gambling community through their respective feedbacks so that we can work on measure to improve in the quality of what we offer and see the image on what we stand to represent.
It depends on the reputation and the current stance of a casino in the leaderboard of all casinos in the industry whether they would need to have paid or non-paid reviews posted everywhere over the internet about them only to lure in more gamblers. A reputable platform wouldn't need that because its marketing campaigns and promotions are enough to gain the attention of users around the industry, whereas a casino that is either new or doesn't have a very good reputation will tend to do such things only to gain more trust among the gamblers in the community.

People who look for reviews before joining a platform should ask other gamblers in public forums such as this one because a person who has experienced something can give you the best feedback about it.
Trying to look around on which there are not having tons of review sites that we do have online on which we can really be able to check out on which means that there would really be no such demand
and if there's one then only a few would really be reading it. Its true that reviews could really be faked out and could really be that not that right or something its false on which we know that there are
competitors on which they are hiring or paying up someone to ruin out others reputation on which this is something not that shocking anymore. This is why not all would really be that not minding about
trying to read up with these review sites on which can actually be able to observe it out on our own and would be making our own decisions whether we would be playing out or not on a particular platform.
hero member
Activity: 2408
Merit: 584
I want to believe that its not all the casino platforms that make reviews both the paid and non paid reviews because they may not have the capacity of affording to go for such for any reason best known to them, which am not in support of, because we must be able to get some feedback in what we offer to the gambling community through their respective feedbacks so that we can work on measure to improve in the quality of what we offer and see the image on what we stand to represent.
It depends on the reputation and the current stance of a casino in the leaderboard of all casinos in the industry whether they would need to have paid or non-paid reviews posted everywhere over the internet about them only to lure in more gamblers. A reputable platform wouldn't need that because its marketing campaigns and promotions are enough to gain the attention of users around the industry, whereas a casino that is either new or doesn't have a very good reputation will tend to do such things only to gain more trust among the gamblers in the community.

People who look for reviews before joining a platform should ask other gamblers in public forums such as this one because a person who has experienced something can give you the best feedback about it.
legendary
Activity: 3500
Merit: 1354
I don't care whether the reviews are positive or negative, the first concern for me is that the reviews are real and not manipulated one or paid ones. No matter how much trusted the casino is, you will get a mixture of good and bad reviews (though good reviews will be more) and that is the best to judge the platform and know what its strengths and what are its weak points.
The main problem is that it is not easy to know whether a review site is manipulated or not, being paid or not, honest or not.
Especially for newbies in this gambling industry, it will hard for them to validate review sites so if we are talking about crypto casinos, this forum should be the first place to go to find information about the crypto casino.

If ever I develop any casino review site, I will allow a section where the gamblers are allowed to post freely and those comments are published on the site without being censored or edited. This will help to know the true feedback of the casino site.
Allowing players to write their own comments/feedback in your review site is good but you also need a filter for it.
Without good filter, players may write something really bad about the casinos just because they lose money.
Without good filter, casinos may ask their players to write something great about the casino by offering few bucks.
hero member
Activity: 2926
Merit: 722
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook

1. Do you read casino reviews?

2. Do you find any casino reviews useful? If so, please share some examples of good casino reviews that you find useful.

3. What should a casino review contain to make you read it?

4. I've already tried to write reviews that I find useful.  If you have the opportunity, please share your thoughts on them: WolfBet Review and LTC Casino Review

5. Additionally, please share any thoughts you have on the topic of casino reviews.




1. Reading casino reviews? No.. I do just simply search up relevant information of a certain site and try to look if there are tons of players who do play on it.

2. Useful on some way but it would really be depending because there are some sites which arent that precise on reading up on whatever reviews been written.
    It would really be just that depending on a certain individual.
3. Everything should be real and transparent as possible.
4. Usefulness would really be something that be depending on the reader, if you do find it useful then reading them would be your path.
5.  As long it would really be that fair and not biased then there would really people who would really be reading it up.
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 1465
To be honest, I myself am quite lazy about reading casino rules, I only often pay attention to countries that are prohibited, after that "KYC" the thing that makes me lazy to look at reviews is that there are a lot of fake reviews.
Not only you but we are many. My own is that the terms and conditions are too long that I could not finished it and I always read half that left the remaining half for them. So what I will contribute to this thread is that they should be brief about their reviews and not a very long writing because people will not read those things before playing the games or using the casino. Brief explanation attract more people than plenty writing.
and sometimes we thought that all of the terms are almost the same so reading each seems to be reading nothing but the same thing in which made us realized not to read but suddenly the thing is the casino sites nowadays are changing theirs in this and that .
Terms, of course, often have slightly different meanings, and even more so when it comes to translating these terms into other languages.  There may well be important and unaccounted for inaccuracies that appear during the game. 

As for reading ToS, I think that very few players study them carefully at all.  One might even say almost no one.  I just want to start playing quickly, rather than read a long text and figure out what it means when legal concepts are used, the meaning of which the player does not know.  It's long and tedious.  And practically no one does this. But here it’s not even worth reproaching people simply because everyone wants to gamble and not engage in lethal text analysis. 
This is why I consider casino reviews really valuable, where it is clearly and concisely written about the rules that are associated with payments for both a deposit, a bet and, of course, withdrawal of funds from a deposit and possible difficulties at each stage of the possible journey of your money.
No one would really be loving on reading up that long pile of text on which it would really be that something that would really that a very common human being behavior specially on gamblers on which
they would really be loving on playing games directly without even reading up those terms completely until they would be able to commit out some violations on which it would really be causing up that potential locked of funds. They would really be making out those kind of complaints and accusations on which this could create those negative vibes towards the platform not until they've shown  proofs that you are the ones who had committed out some violation.  When in speaking about gambling or casino reviews then we would really be preferring for things to be transparent and legit as possible.
If you have read up something which is unbelievable or something that doesnt convinced you then you could really always ask out the community whether its a legit thing or not.
There would really be those people who are really that having that kind if skeptical approach on every information that they are able to read.
In fact, in order to really accurately and thoroughly understand the operating rules of some casinos that have published huge ToS texts, you should at least have a legal education and understand what legal norms apply in a given jurisdiction. 
In many Services, including, for example, casinos, they like to write such long and tedious texts, they are simply trying to insure themselves against all sorts of customer complaints.  I immediately remembered the rules for working with clients of such a cryptocurrency service as the Blockchain.com wallet.  All you have to do is look at how many nuances they have written in their documents and any desire to use their service will immediately disappear.  And the situation is approximately the same with the rules of working in casinos.  Unfortunately, all this, in my opinion, significantly worsens your comfort when using the casino, since you always know in advance that the casino always has some points of rules unknown to you, and these points are always not aimed at protecting your rights and your interests.  And you are really sure that this is all directed only against you.
copper member
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
Greetings to all forum users!

I own a casino review website. I, like many people here, am already tired of the same type of basic casino reviews, which I have done myself, unfortunately.

It's time for a change, and I want to write reviews that would be really interesting and useful to gamblers.

There are a lot of experienced gamblers on this forum, so I decided to ask you what you would like to see in casino reviews.

I would be grateful if you could share your thoughts on this and answer these questions:

1. Do you read casino reviews?

2. Do you find any casino reviews useful? If so, please share some examples of good casino reviews that you find useful.

3. What should a casino review contain to make you read it?


1. Yes, I do read casino reviews pretty often. It’s a great way to get a feel for a place before committing any money.
2. Definitely, some reviews have been super helpful. The ones that stand out usually dive deep into not just the games available but also cover the user experience, customer service responsiveness, and the withdrawal process.
3. For a casino review to really grab my attention, I’d love to see more than just the basics. A personal touch makes a big difference—maybe sharing some stories or experiences from real users.
Looking forward to seeing what you come up with. It’s great to see someone aiming to enhance the quality of casino reviews out there!
Pages:
Jump to: