Ok. I'll get this topic back on the right track.
I have another strategy that is slow growing but very effective. Here it is, in a nutshell.
This method requires adjustment based on your balance and a bit of math to ensure that is risk free. (By risk free, I simply mean there is roughly a 6/100 chance of losing a small part of your starting balance) You can and most likely will lose your profit though if you let it run too long.
For this example we are starting with a balance of 0.1900000 of Anycoin.
The target range being 1-100
Set target to: UNDER 94
Set Base bet to: 0.00009
On every 1 loss: Increase bet 3000%
Here is why this works.....
The profit happens on the first bet after every loss.
Every 1 win betting 0.00009 = 0.00001800 profit
1 loss bet increases to 0.00270000 followed by 1 win = 0.00054000 profit
2 losses bet increases to 0.08100000 followed by 1 win = 0.0162000 profit
3 losses bet increases to 2.4300000 followed by 1 win = 0.48600000 profit
Of course the 3rd bet is impossible with this balance so that is it's own safety net of sorts. I can typically run this strategy for thirty minutes to a hour before I lose 3 in a row.
1 loss happens 1/50 on average followed by small profit.
2 losses in a row though... That is where the magic happens. It's rare but it happens. That is why this strategy is pseudo-safe but slow.
3 losses in a row is so unbelievably against the odds. I say unbelievably referring to how often it is NOT supposed to happen, but DOES anyways. If you manage to pull out before this inevitable improbability though, you will be sitting on a nice little profit.
Well.... There it is. My top secret weapon.... Revealed.
Don't abuse it or it will be "maintenanced". I've made a decent amount using this but I've always been too scared to to go big with it. This is MY strategy. I have documentation of it older than you. Use it freely, it's more open source but Don't take credit for inventing it. I've named this in the spirit of slapping a gamblers worst enemy in the face.. That being the useless, destructive Martingale.
This is called the "Smartingale".
Remember me when you are finally profiting.
Here's my address if you want to thank me:
1FB4e1iG8eizNtMKqn9LHQB1byRJ9354rA
Thanks for reading, I am reluctant to post this.
Edit- I'd like to point out the flawless math here. If you take all the bet amounts from start of 0.00009000 through the 2 losses bet amount of 0.081 and figure out the sum of all parts, it is just enough to make that fourth bet in the unlikely event of Starting out on a 4 bet losing streak. Which by the way I've NEVER seen happen and probably never will.
I'd say good luck but you won't need it. Instead I'll say good self control. You'll need plenty of that
"Remember, provably fair is an overused term and in most cases, improperly used. It'd be better defined as provably unaltered. Fair has no place in gambling" ChrisButler
I don't see how you could make any profit with such 'strategy'. Increasing the bets so much knowing you won't be able to afford a 4th lose in a row? 4 loses in a row happen very often.
It's pure luck, it's all about having a defined goal or max loss per day and let luck do the rest in my opinion.
You don't see how I could make any profit with this method? You must have missed the part where I describe it in full detail. Actually, the fourth bet doesn't ever happen. The bet amount on the fourth bet is waaaay above the remaining balance. That's 1/2 the reason for the high increase.
"For loses in a row happen very often."?
Did you read this at all? The target is under 94...
One more time... UNDER 94. The odds of losing are 6/100. Losing only once with this method is very rare. But it does happen and for some reason when the astronomically uneven odds are in your favor. Somehow rolling OVER 94 becomes something that happens much more often than when your target is OVER 94.
So after the third loss then this strategy is reset right back to where you started. I spent several minutes designing this method.
It's possible to profit with this method? YES
Is it possible to bust with this method? NO.
Does this method work every time? NO. Of course not.