Silberman: that actually makes a lot of sense, especially when you consider a lot of the response to a coin's movement may be automated. I hadn't thought of that.
andriarto: that's what I wanted to know. I've been researching for a bit over a month (including the aforementioned course), but it surprised me to see such a fast reaction from other coins.
Darker45: sorry, that wasn't my intention (and it sure isn't my intention to make a disaster with my money...
)
Either way, I'm intending to start investing on 6 different coins (
including bitcoin, ethereum and bnb). What I meant was, if I'm investing in a number of different coins, it would make sense to get coins that are not going to crash all at the same time (yeah, I understand there's no way to really know).
1. In a market that boasts transparency, it remains a coin with an unknown founder.
It's a feature, not a bug. Having an unknown founder means that we have no idea about his/her/their political views, other intentions, etc. And especially knowing that the founder isn't active anymore, it makes the decision making around Bitcoin's protocol updates more decentralized.
Oh, I know it's not a bug. Bugs don't take 12 years to fix. I'll have to disagree on the "feature" thing though...
Having an unknown founder also means there's nobody responsible (legally) if things go south. For all we know, Bitcoin's founder could be Bernie Maddoff, or Kenneth Lay. The point is transparency only works if you display it
always, not only when it's "convenient" to you.
2. I have read Bitcoin's whitepaper, and it's mostly an essay about the advantages of cryptocurrency, but not about Bitcoin.
Take note that all the cryptocurrencies you can see right now on CoinMarketCap doesn't exist at the time the Bitcoin whitepaper was written. Bitcoin bootstrapped all that. If you really want to learn Bitcoin's advantages though, you'd have to look outside the whitepaper, on other articles. Obviously because Bitcoin has almost nothing to compare to back then.
I understand that, but Bitcoin's owner(s) have had 12 years to state their purpose. Articles are, at best, educated guesses. I'd like to see an official statement, straight from the coin's owners, to that effect
Just to make things clear: that doesn't mean that Bitcoin is a no-no for me. I'm considering to (ideally) start on at least 6 different coins, and I do acknowledge Bitcoin's pre-eminence on the market. But I wouldn't even dream to have a 100% Bitcoin portfolio.
The reason I started the thread is because, while I'm aware of the market's fluctuations, it surprised me to see such a fast reaction from other coins (especially Ethereum and bnb) to Bitcoin's dip.
In any case, this thread has been very informative to me. Thank you all for the help.