Pages:
Author

Topic: What happened to my trust. Admins, help me please... - page 2. (Read 721 times)

legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 2223
Signature space for rent
Why Saint-loup feedback's not visible to me by default even he is on DT2 Huh. I had not excluded him. His feedback's showing to me on untrusted feedback's. Am I missing something ?

It appears to me even when adding ;dt.
I can see also if add ;dt. But his feedback should visible by default to all member if did not exclude. Am I right ? So why not showing to me Huh
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1491
I forgot more than you will ever know.
~snip~

This is a neutral review. He is expressing his opinion which he is entitled too based on the reference.

You won what you came here for, I wouldn't be pushing it.

Edit: also the review says "suspected".

I am myself convinced that you are an alt too.
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 2353
OK
Done.
legendary
Activity: 2240
Merit: 3150
₿uy / $ell ..oeleo ;(
Seems like the bounty report posted in the french local board was the tipping point for Saint-loup.
I agree that those posts are quite annoying outside of the bounty section but surly they deserve way "better" treatment.

If it was me, I would remove my negative feedback and focus on the plagiarism, it's much better to get them banned completely.
Trust and feedback are for different occasions.  
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 6581
be constructive or S.T.F.U
If you think it's the best way to do, it's ok for me, I leave you the responsibility of the case.

This is the mod's responsibility , all what we are somehow morally obligated to do is report these incidents , i understand that your intention is to reduce low quality content, but sadly your tag does not accomplish it, the user will still be able to post whatever they want in the ANN section and now even in Meta because of the tag he got.

you spent the time to read his posts and seems like you were fairly confident that he is a spammer, i think if you reported a few posts of his or if you happened to find plagiarized content and reported those to the mods, he would have been already banned .

having said that, i still stand to my opinion that while this user might deserve to be banned, he does not deserve a negative at all, simply because he is not a scammer but rather a spammer.

legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1491
I forgot more than you will ever know.
~snip~

Was going to say the exact same thing.
legendary
Activity: 3290
Merit: 16489
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
I'll throw in my 2 satoshis too: OP is a bounty spammer, but that seems to be accepted on the bounty boards. Even if it wouldn't be accepted, it's something Mods should handle, and not something that DT should tag.
Posting on the wrong board can happen to anyone if you use enough open tabs. Not moving it by yourself is dumb/spam, but still not a reason to tag it. I've reported 100 times more posts than I've tagged, which is how spam should be handled.

I was going to Merit OP for his post that's worth reading, until I read his first post was asking about Merit. I can't verify it though, after OP deleted many of his posts. I assume OP has more accounts, and uses them to spam bounties (just like many other or even all bounty spammers do), and I don't want to give OP a Jr. Member signature to spam with.

Can I ask you something, be honest. Why does someone who knows the word 'scoundrel' participate in social media bounties?
I was wondering this too, and it makes sense if OP has more accounts.



TL;DR I think this shouldn't be tagged.
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 2353
So if you're not able to respect the first rule of this forum, I don't know why are you here?

You're not a moderator though. Report shitposts to moderators, let them deal with it.

"No zero or low value, pointless or uninteresting posts or threads."

That has nothing to do with his/her/it's trustworthyness unfortunately.

If you believe that account is an alt, you should tag it as an alt, not as a spammer.

I will not argue for hours because I hate that.
If you think it's the best way to do, it's ok for me, I leave you the responsibility of the case.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1491
I forgot more than you will ever know.
"No zero or low value, pointless or uninteresting posts or threads."

That has nothing to do with his/her/it's trustworthyness unfortunately.

If you believe that account is an alt, you should tag it as an alt, not as a spammer.
newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
You're lying. I read your first posts in russian with google translate and they are about what? Merits...
Which real brand new user is aware of merit?

I was interested in that, but did not write any word about my desire of getting merit

you're certainly not even a woman, it's my belief.
a controversial way to ask me out

I don't know why are you here?
I have answered already - for social media bounties
you might have marked me...because you were sure that i wouldn't do anything.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
So if you're not able to respect the first rule of this forum, I don't know why are you here?

You're not a moderator though. Report shitposts to moderators, let them deal with it.
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 2353
BTW @SvetaIvanova your history had 24 pages yesterday. 24×20=480 posts
http://archive.is/nO8QQ
Why suddenly it only has 18 pages and 350 posts now?
You did some housework today?  Roll Eyes
legendary
Activity: 2604
Merit: 2353
So if someone on DT1 is doing something stupid, you can ask other DT1 members to distrust them.

Good afternoon, admins,

I am here at the forum with only one goal - to take part in social media bounties. If it would be possible to participate in the bounties without an account on bitcointalk, I wouldn't register any.

I've registered an account, because each participant is required to sign up. I've never set goals to communicate, write posts, get a
high rank. I've only been sending my reports to bounty branches as required by the managers.
It's not against the rules.

What happened to my trust then?

I've mistakenly placed the report not in the bounty topic, but in another thread, it really happened by mistake. In such cases, admins should only remove the wrong post and give user a warning, nothing more. I didn't get any warnings, I was just marked with a red trust.

Then I contacted the person who gave it to me. But this user cannot come to an agreement with me, his main argument is: "you have a lot of
messages and no merit. Improve the history of your posts and get merit»

Why should I change my goals in order to satisfy this scoundrel's thirst
for power?

I always place, I repeat once again, all my messages in the bounty branches, as required by managers.

I think that the red trust for posting bounty reports where they should be  -  is completely lawless, especially from the user from the trust list.

The act of the person who marked me is a real manifestation of intolerance, violation of the freedom of will and abuse.
He oppresses me, forcing me to write posts and receive merit. I see it as a violation of my personality.
This user exceeds his authority and uses the trust rating for wrong purposes.

Ask the admins and users in the trust list to draw attention to this injustice and to return me to neutral trust.
You're lying. I read your first posts in russian with google translate and they are about what? Merits...
Which real brand new user is aware of merit?

Your second post google translated
The same users get Merit from Xandri, the same users communicate in topics about rules, merit and topic design and offer themselves as meritsors. Conspiracy is so-so, of course. You can delete my message, but users are not blind, and everyone can see. I see not a specialist in forum rules and topic design, but one who understands Altcoin, ICO, trading and programming. The whole "army" of helpers is following the Newbies. Also, meritsors do them - this is the edge.

So your storytelling is just a big lie. You're obviously a multi account just here to try to earn money by abusing bounty campaigns and flooding the forum, you're certainly not even a woman, it's my belief.
I never saw a newbie opening a thread in the meta section before you, btw.

Alex_Sr quoted the first rule of the forum :
"No zero or low value, pointless or uninteresting posts or threads."

So if you're not able to respect the first rule of this forum, I don't know why are you here?

newbie
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
@OP
Can I ask you something, be honest. Why does someone who knows the word 'scoundrel' participate in social media bounties? The lowest type of bounties - quality wise. They generate enormous amounts of spam both on Bitcointalk and on social media. These bounties can get you banned on BT due to spam or in your case, red tagged, and you are also risking having your twitter account blocked since they have started to do that a lot in the last 5-6 months.
And in the end you get tokens that are maybe worth $15-20 depending on the success of the campaign.

Your name seems Eastern European, could be Russian or Bulgarian, your English is fine. Why not go for content creation, quality translations, those kind of things that wont generate such a huge amount of bounty reports and spam?

I hope you manage to sort out your issue with the red tag and change the way you do bounties.

Thank you very much for the recommendations, I really plan to make reviews in my native Russian language, and now I'm doing the work that I can. It's not my fault that reports are accepted by this way.
If the admins want to get rid of such messages on the forum, they can include one paragraph to the forum rules "all bounty reports, for example, are accepted through Google forms"
hero member
Activity: 2366
Merit: 793
Bitcoin = Financial freedom
If I am not wrong,still his/her account can be nuked! Roll Eyes

Because the user still newbie and not contributing much to the forum,which is can be enough reason to execute.

legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1491
I forgot more than you will ever know.
Thank you for tagging me suchmoon.

Even though I don't see any added value from OP to the forum the neg is a bit overzealous in my mind.

Saint-Loup will be notified as well by the notification bot. Let's see what he does.
I would recommend switching this one to neutral if he really wants to keep it there.

legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 7065
@OP
Can I ask you something, be honest. Why does someone who knows the word 'scoundrel' participate in social media bounties? The lowest type of bounties - quality wise. They generate enormous amounts of spam both on Bitcointalk and on social media. These bounties can get you banned on BT due to spam or in your case, red tagged, and you are also risking having your twitter account blocked since they have started to do that a lot in the last 5-6 months.
And in the end you get tokens that are maybe worth $15-20 depending on the success of the campaign.

Your name seems Eastern European, could be Russian or Bulgarian, your English is fine. Why not go for content creation, quality translations, those kind of things that wont generate such a huge amount of bounty reports and spam?

I hope you manage to sort out your issue with the red tag and change the way you do bounties.
legendary
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8909
https://bpip.org
It looks like Saint-loup is on DT2 by way of Halab, who is DT1.  Most Saint-loup's reviews seem appropriate and contain references.  I can't help but agree with all of them, even his review of you is accurate.

@OP, PM Saint-loup and ask him to reconsider his review.  Point him in the direction of this thread.  I think most DT1 member would agree that his review of you seems petty, and is an abuse DT2 powers.

If Saint-loup won't reconsider you can ask Halab to remove him from his list.

Halab
JohnUser
asche

Are Saint-loup's "sponsors".

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;full;dt
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 6581
be constructive or S.T.F.U

The trust system is not meant for forum law enforcement, such cases should be handled by "report to moderators".

Don't get me wrong, I don't think red trust is appropriate here. I think you should have been banned after your first 3 useless one-liners.

exactly ^

Quote
Why are you worried about trust then?

apparently he might not be accepted in those b.s bounties with a neg feedback from a DT member.
copper member
Activity: 2338
Merit: 4543
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
It looks like Saint-loup is on DT2 by way of Halab, who is DT1.  Most of Saint-loup's reviews seem appropriate and contain references.  I can't help but agree with all of them, even his review of you is accurate.

@OP, PM Saint-loup and ask him to reconsider his review.  Point him in the direction of this thread.  I think most DT1 member would agree that his review of you seems petty, and is an abuse DT2 powers.

If Saint-loup won't reconsider you can ask Halab to remove him from his list.

ETA:
Halab
JohnUser
asche

Are Saint-loup's "sponsors".

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;full;dt
Pages:
Jump to: