Pages:
Author

Topic: What If All Bounty Hunters Gets United, Will it not End Their Mistreatment? - page 2. (Read 284 times)

full member
Activity: 602
Merit: 100
Those projects that reduce the reward of participants at the end of the campaign are understandable and ready for the fact that there will be dissatisfaction and a lot of bad words addressed to them, so they do not care about this and their reputation. Honestly, I don’t know how to influence the fraudsters and what we can do for our part to bring them to the responsibility.
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1283
I'd say that's what you get for wanting to work for projects that pay you with their own tokens.

If I provide a service for someone, I'd want to be paid with something I can immediately exchange for fiat, be it Bitcoin or whatever exchangeable altcoin.
People working for worthless tokens bring failure onto themselves, that's not how you run a successful business.

With new clients, I demand payment upfront, there's literally no way that I get scammed.
If the client is unhappy with my work, I'd just resolve it (not that that's ever happened).

Why should bounty hunters work differently? Why do you accept to get paid in worthless tokens?
Why do you work for projects that can't even afford to pay for promotion?
Experience is a treasure. The more experience you get the more professional you work. Most hunters jump into projects not knowing what it really offer until they are giving worthless rewards. I have suffered same too. But with experience, I am getting more professional.  Wink

Yeah that's the thing. For most of these bounty task, you don't even need to have any sort of expertise, which in turn attracts people who have very little skills.
It's in everyone's best interest to just not join any of these projects, basically for a promise that you'll get paid.

If you can find projects that are willing to just pay you for your work, I'd recommend joining those instead.
hero member
Activity: 2884
Merit: 794
I am terrible at Fantasy Football!!!
I have been wondering a while about how some ICOs treat their bounty hunters, imagine an ICO projects reduced bounty reward after the bounty program has already ended, sometimes 10X less than the agreed reward. I think if the hunters should have one voice, as in if all bounty hunters are united, they can also stand against the mistreatment from ICO projects. Or what do you guys think?
That is not going to change anything, to begin with how do you plan to organize people that are all over the world? How do you plan that everyone follows the same leadership? And even more importantly how are you going to enforce your demands? Because most of the time you are going to find that you were scammed when the ico ends and the developers just disappear, how are you going to get your tokens when there is no one to distribute them?
full member
Activity: 308
Merit: 105
Generally that responsibility falls to bounty managers but they're often very lax in that, I think perhaps because they know they're getting paid either way and that there's so many bounty hunters that it won't hurt their future earnings. If we as bounty hunters started not to go to the bounties of such managers then it would force them to up their game and ensure that they have our interests in mind as well as their own.
sr. member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 255
How do you plan to unite everyone when they are all busy trying to complete their task for the week?

I'm not up to it though. I benefit from the ICO campaigns although the money isn't enough, I think I will survive when finally the price go up. The bullrun had made a lot of bounty hunters very rich so there is no point in doing a revolt here. If it weren't for those ICO team, there will no nothing to work on for the crypto.
sr. member
Activity: 784
Merit: 256
Binance #Smart World Global Token
What will change?? After all, you will learn about cheating only after the bounty campaign is over and you can not change anything. Of course, you can initially transfer the bounty campaign Fund created by the bounty community. But then the fraud on the part of the Fund will flourish.
sr. member
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
Hmm. I think you're talking about Yumerium bounty campaign. As I can see Yumerium bounty reward decreased because there was a coin burning of unsold YUM token because there were big investors couldn't pass YUMERIUM KYC. LOL. It's all Yumerium team cay give us. LOL. Although there are so many bounty hunters are fighting against this reducing but seem like it's useless.
jr. member
Activity: 121
Merit: 1
The World’s First Blockchain Core
That is the general problem about bounties. They are reducing the amount always. I think that will be good if we can make something like that. It seems little bit difficult but if we can create big united  community which support that issue that can be good. But on the other hand icos know that they can do everything. They can even cancel bounty program after the end date. We can not make something to these guys but maybe they can afraid from the big united community. Because we can do some advertisement but also we can spread fud about these icos .
sr. member
Activity: 2310
Merit: 332
I have been wondering a while about how some ICOs treat their bounty hunters, imagine an ICO projects reduced bounty reward after the bounty program has already ended, sometimes 10X less than the agreed reward. I think if the hunters should have one voice, as in if all bounty hunters are united, they can also stand against the mistreatment from ICO projects. Or what do you guys think?

I feel the empathy on this post but the thing against the aspiration of this post is that digital currency is not regulated and in fact, it was made to be independent, decentralized and standing on its own. We just have to be careful, join bounty managed by reputable managers that will be sincere and or opt out if contract arrangement is not cool with developers.
full member
Activity: 532
Merit: 100
I have been wondering a while about how some ICOs treat their bounty hunters, imagine an ICO projects reduced bounty reward after the bounty program has already ended, sometimes 10X less than the agreed reward. I think if the hunters should have one voice, as in if all bounty hunters are united, they can also stand against the mistreatment from ICO projects. Or what do you guys think?
Payments depend on the team of the project, and bounty hunters will not be able to do anything about them. Even the team of the project may refuse to pay the bounty hunter if they wish. We need projects that accept escrow, then pay for the bounty hunter will be guaranteed
sr. member
Activity: 1316
Merit: 379
#SWGT PRE-SALE IS LIVE
I'd say that's what you get for wanting to work for projects that pay you with their own tokens.

If I provide a service for someone, I'd want to be paid with something I can immediately exchange for fiat, be it Bitcoin or whatever exchangeable altcoin.
People working for worthless tokens bring failure onto themselves, that's not how you run a successful business.

With new clients, I demand payment upfront, there's literally no way that I get scammed.
If the client is unhappy with my work, I'd just resolve it (not that that's ever happened).

Why should bounty hunters work differently? Why do you accept to get paid in worthless tokens?
Why do you work for projects that can't even afford to pay for promotion?
Experience is a treasure. The more experience you get the more professional you work. Most hunters jump into projects not knowing what it really offer until they are giving worthless rewards. I have suffered same too. But with experience, I am getting more professional.  Wink
sr. member
Activity: 1148
Merit: 252
I know it sucks but they're not really much you can do. Only join good projects you feel that are legit.Don't just join every bounty campaign out there just because you can
member
Activity: 154
Merit: 10
I have been wondering a while about how some ICOs treat their bounty hunters, imagine an ICO projects reduced bounty reward after the bounty program has already ended, sometimes 10X less than the agreed reward. I think if the hunters should have one voice, as in if all bounty hunters are united, they can also stand against the mistreatment from ICO projects. Or what do you guys think?

I agree with you. The bounty in the end is like an agreement and as we hunter respect the parameters (decided by them), they too must do it
sr. member
Activity: 770
Merit: 251
MOBU - FUTURE OF SECURITY TOKENS
I have been wondering a while about how some ICOs treat their bounty hunters, imagine an ICO projects reduced bounty reward after the bounty program has already ended, sometimes 10X less than the agreed reward. I think if the hunters should have one voice, as in if all bounty hunters are united, they can also stand against the mistreatment from ICO projects. Or what do you guys think?

How are you gonna "stand against mistreatment"? Even if there would be thousands of us, bounty hunters, united together we would hardly ever change something, because there is no legal basis for this. Just look at all those scam ICOs which are deceiving thousands of people and run away with their crypto...And you are speaking about BOUNTY)) Free tokens for your spent time...There is no regulation in this sphere yet and that's the main problem of crypto world.
legendary
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1283
I'd say that's what you get for wanting to work for projects that pay you with their own tokens.

If I provide a service for someone, I'd want to be paid with something I can immediately exchange for fiat, be it Bitcoin or whatever exchangeable altcoin.
People working for worthless tokens bring failure onto themselves, that's not how you run a successful business.

With new clients, I demand payment upfront, there's literally no way that I get scammed.
If the client is unhappy with my work, I'd just resolve it (not that that's ever happened).

Why should bounty hunters work differently? Why do you accept to get paid in worthless tokens?
Why do you work for projects that can't even afford to pay for promotion?
full member
Activity: 1820
Merit: 107
I have been wondering a while about how some ICOs treat their bounty hunters, imagine an ICO projects reduced bounty reward after the bounty program has already ended, sometimes 10X less than the agreed reward. I think if the hunters should have one voice, as in if all bounty hunters are united, they can also stand against the mistreatment from ICO projects. Or what do you guys think?
You must point out what the "Mistreatment" are you talking about! Is this about the late payments or what? As we know ICO's nowadays are struggling hard to even reach the softcap because of this bearish market sentiment. We know that "Bounty Workers" in this particular year is gamble to be paid or not? its our own action and we are all responsible with this, whatever the result is maybe its "GOOD or BAD".
member
Activity: 1540
Merit: 68
Coming together of bounty hunters in a single voice is quite difficult
Most bounty hunter thinks only about work and get paid so they just spend time promoting any ico they see without thorough knowledge of the project

Bounty hunters are greedy, always stealing people information to submit a new application
Just forget the idea, not sure it can work
member
Activity: 280
Merit: 11
I have been wondering a while about how some ICOs treat their bounty hunters, imagine an ICO projects reduced bounty reward after the bounty program has already ended, sometimes 10X less than the agreed reward. I think if the hunters should have one voice, as in if all bounty hunters are united, they can also stand against the mistreatment from ICO projects. Or what do you guys think?
I wish bounty hunters can actually agreed together,but,it is a dream that can never come true.one of the reason why we were been treated like that is because,those runing the ICO know that even if they reduce the rewards,some people will still do it,we have too many despirate hunters here that are ready to settle for anything.I just hope we can wake up.
full member
Activity: 868
Merit: 116
This may not totally end the mistreatment bounty hunters are receiving from ICO projects but I am sure it will Get 80 - 90% reduction of the Mistreatment. But I wonder the possibility of them coming together anyway.
full member
Activity: 518
Merit: 124
I have been wondering a while about how some ICOs treat their bounty hunters, imagine an ICO projects reduced bounty reward after the bounty program has already ended, sometimes 10X less than the agreed reward. I think if the hunters should have one voice, as in if all bounty hunters are united, they can also stand against the mistreatment from ICO projects. Or what do you guys think?
Pages:
Jump to: