1 - Form of Money: How might the transition from thinking of Sats merely as a fraction of Bitcoin to accepting it as a distinct form of money change our economic landscape?
2 - Stability: What would it take for a Sats-driven economy to achieve stability, considering the highly volatile nature of Bitcoin? Could it provide a steadier foundation than existing fiat currencies?
3 - Fair Value: Could Sats provide an equitable value system that transcends borders and economic disparities, creating a more just financial world?
0. A state/world currency cannot exist and fulfill its role, without additional issuance. This is the key problem why a cryptocurrency like bitcoin will never become a currency of account, whether of a single state, whether of the world.... This is the key problem with cryptocurrencies with limited issuance. Why is there a need for additional issuance ? That's how economics works - money itself has no value. Their value is formed by goods, resources, services that are created by society.
1. The indivisibility of the satoshi, with its high value, will not allow you to make transactions with goods/services costing less than 1 satoshi.
2. Stability can theoretically be realized, but the problem is that the economy cannot exist without additional emission and controlled inflation. And this contradicts this point
3. No. Value is not formed by the monetary unit, but by the economy, technology, the power of the state and government,... Money is a projection of the power of the state. And again - without additional emission, there will be wild deflation, because the volume of goods/services/.... will constantly increase. And in the absence of additional emission, it will lead to collapsing deflation
