int prob_of_overflow ( myAge , actuarial.lifeTable )
Topic: What is a "signed int"? - page 2. (Read 2491 times)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO3YnoAAoJEFonJil8Kq9nW50H/RXpag1ZM9Yz9w1l/JDBa+tc
vA/VyZFRQbo2f+H+6TuQ7iFjgCraOuT6CUkRwpkXMw2cJ0ofD87ftnayLM7SxKH+
Xey8APQV7Vm3yXYKH7tDGcXuo9DrQLpT0pKkTuWmoOwH884evhDOVHPm1ev/lGot
lXARdBb6Jf1ANdaeOP22RxWL97UxZWF0ePvN0z3bPNehza/sHqmOlXdiETAjkiKy
juaQ6TdfhBFuhNY0QY50R9HEItkwG+69H2dguV3B472cjHcHvv5bUCTrK8wPCwhw
up/5WEsW56lv6e06mU4r0XNGTkAzQ5B5AgTLHTdMvUMabZ4Lfygzy7+5jU/QhJ4=
=scw1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO3YnoAAoJEFonJil8Kq9nW50H/RXpag1ZM9Yz9w1l/JDBa+tc
vA/VyZFRQbo2f+H+6TuQ7iFjgCraOuT6CUkRwpkXMw2cJ0ofD87ftnayLM7SxKH+
Xey8APQV7Vm3yXYKH7tDGcXuo9DrQLpT0pKkTuWmoOwH884evhDOVHPm1ev/lGot
lXARdBb6Jf1ANdaeOP22RxWL97UxZWF0ePvN0z3bPNehza/sHqmOlXdiETAjkiKy
juaQ6TdfhBFuhNY0QY50R9HEItkwG+69H2dguV3B472cjHcHvv5bUCTrK8wPCwhw
up/5WEsW56lv6e06mU4r0XNGTkAzQ5B5AgTLHTdMvUMabZ4Lfygzy7+5jU/QhJ4=
=scw1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Theymos a little humorous, but (±1) for BTCurious
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO3YnoAAoJEFonJil8Kq9nW50H/RXpag1ZM9Yz9w1l/JDBa+tc
vA/VyZFRQbo2f+H+6TuQ7iFjgCraOuT6CUkRwpkXMw2cJ0ofD87ftnayLM7SxKH+
Xey8APQV7Vm3yXYKH7tDGcXuo9DrQLpT0pKkTuWmoOwH884evhDOVHPm1ev/lGot
lXARdBb6Jf1ANdaeOP22RxWL97UxZWF0ePvN0z3bPNehza/sHqmOlXdiETAjkiKy
juaQ6TdfhBFuhNY0QY50R9HEItkwG+69H2dguV3B472cjHcHvv5bUCTrK8wPCwhw
up/5WEsW56lv6e06mU4r0XNGTkAzQ5B5AgTLHTdMvUMabZ4Lfygzy7+5jU/QhJ4=
=scw1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO3YnoAAoJEFonJil8Kq9nW50H/RXpag1ZM9Yz9w1l/JDBa+tc
vA/VyZFRQbo2f+H+6TuQ7iFjgCraOuT6CUkRwpkXMw2cJ0ofD87ftnayLM7SxKH+
Xey8APQV7Vm3yXYKH7tDGcXuo9DrQLpT0pKkTuWmoOwH884evhDOVHPm1ev/lGot
lXARdBb6Jf1ANdaeOP22RxWL97UxZWF0ePvN0z3bPNehza/sHqmOlXdiETAjkiKy
juaQ6TdfhBFuhNY0QY50R9HEItkwG+69H2dguV3B472cjHcHvv5bUCTrK8wPCwhw
up/5WEsW56lv6e06mU4r0XNGTkAzQ5B5AgTLHTdMvUMabZ4Lfygzy7+5jU/QhJ4=
=scw1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
hahahaahahahahah
I don't get it 
I wonder if he'll ever become more public about his identity. Certainly, at the very least, he's a funny guy.
It's the "within the next 25 years" part that makes the quote funny. Representing time with a signed int doesn't become a problem for a long time, so Satoshi was being sarcastic.
Am I the only one who finds this quote funny? Maybe it needs more context.
I found it funny, but that's because I have background in Unix timekeeping and C jargon. I assume the average person doesn't have this knowledge, and therefore it would not make sense to them.Am I the only one who finds this quote funny? Maybe it needs more context.
I also found it funny. Doesn't need more context right now, but maybe when "commoners" adopt Bitcoin...
@BTCurious It took me 2 full seconds to get it. I can't believe it took that long! Good job. Would buy again.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO3YnoAAoJEFonJil8Kq9nW50H/RXpag1ZM9Yz9w1l/JDBa+tc
vA/VyZFRQbo2f+H+6TuQ7iFjgCraOuT6CUkRwpkXMw2cJ0ofD87ftnayLM7SxKH+
Xey8APQV7Vm3yXYKH7tDGcXuo9DrQLpT0pKkTuWmoOwH884evhDOVHPm1ev/lGot
lXARdBb6Jf1ANdaeOP22RxWL97UxZWF0ePvN0z3bPNehza/sHqmOlXdiETAjkiKy
juaQ6TdfhBFuhNY0QY50R9HEItkwG+69H2dguV3B472cjHcHvv5bUCTrK8wPCwhw
up/5WEsW56lv6e06mU4r0XNGTkAzQ5B5AgTLHTdMvUMabZ4Lfygzy7+5jU/QhJ4=
=scw1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Hash: SHA1
7
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO3YnoAAoJEFonJil8Kq9nW50H/RXpag1ZM9Yz9w1l/JDBa+tc
vA/VyZFRQbo2f+H+6TuQ7iFjgCraOuT6CUkRwpkXMw2cJ0ofD87ftnayLM7SxKH+
Xey8APQV7Vm3yXYKH7tDGcXuo9DrQLpT0pKkTuWmoOwH884evhDOVHPm1ev/lGot
lXARdBb6Jf1ANdaeOP22RxWL97UxZWF0ePvN0z3bPNehza/sHqmOlXdiETAjkiKy
juaQ6TdfhBFuhNY0QY50R9HEItkwG+69H2dguV3B472cjHcHvv5bUCTrK8wPCwhw
up/5WEsW56lv6e06mU4r0XNGTkAzQ5B5AgTLHTdMvUMabZ4Lfygzy7+5jU/QhJ4=
=scw1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
A signed integer can be either negative or positive (- or +), such as 55 and -55. An unsigned int can only be positive. If you only need to deal with positive numbers, you should use unsigned ints because the maximum integer number the type can hold will be twice as much as a signed int.
Correct.
We could get into the amount of values it can hold, but that maybe a little more advanced (like a 64 bit unsigned integer).
It's the "within the next 25 years" part that makes the quote funny. Representing time with a signed int doesn't become a problem for a long time, so Satoshi was being sarcastic.
Am I the only one who finds this quote funny? Maybe it needs more context.
I found it funny, but that's because I have background in Unix timekeeping and C jargon. I assume the average person doesn't have this knowledge, and therefore it would not make sense to them. Am I the only one who finds this quote funny? Maybe it needs more context.
It's the "within the next 25 years" part that makes the quote funny. Representing time with a signed int doesn't become a problem for a long time, so Satoshi was being sarcastic.
Am I the only one who finds this quote funny? Maybe it needs more context.
Am I the only one who finds this quote funny? Maybe it needs more context.
A signed integer can be either negative or positive (- or +), such as 55 and -55. An unsigned int can only be positive. If you only need to deal with positive numbers, you should use unsigned ints because the maximum integer number the type can hold will be twice as much as a signed int.
"There should not be any signed int. If you've found a signed int somewhere, please tell me (within the next 25 years please) and I'll change it to unsigned int." -- Satoshi
What is a signed int and why should they be unsigned, according to Satoshi?
What is a signed int and why should they be unsigned, according to Satoshi?
Jump to: