Topic: What is more risky. Sport or casino bets ? - page 32. (Read 27673 times)
I think casino betting is more risky since it is random based while sports betting has some skill involved and learning the teams and the way they play so it has a very stong strategic element invlolved which can be to your advantage but is not for everyone.
I think casino bets are more risky but there are so many variables that the question is pretty impossible to give an accurate answer to.
If you're knowledgable on sports then you can be successful gambling but even then anything can happen.
If you're knowledgable on sports then you can be successful gambling but even then anything can happen.
hello,
What is your opinion bout this.
If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win. VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?
If you have no knowledge on the sport you are betting on, then of course sports will be way more risky. However, if you have a good understanding of the sport and have studied teams, then the casino will be a lot more risky.What is your opinion bout this.
If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win. VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?
That is a good point you have there. In deed when a gambler plays gambling then he must really know what he is doing. If he doesn't then every gambling game is much more riskier than it should. But you are right, if you know nothing of sports gambling, then there is quite a greater risk of losing there.
hello,
What is your opinion bout this.
If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win. VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?
If you have no knowledge on the sport you are betting on, then of course sports will be way more risky. However, if you have a good understanding of the sport and have studied teams, then the casino will be a lot more risky. What is your opinion bout this.
If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win. VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?
Depends on how good you're at predicting sports. If you don't know anything and just betting blindly based on the odds, you're probably going to lose. On casino games, you are doomed to lose unless you are very lucky. The house always wins on casino, and they also do for the most part on sports betting.
Right, in sports only we win in skills base, if we judge and predict about sports than we have chance to win, but blindly we only play in dice, and on casino games, I always say that house always win, and in sports betting on casino, we firstly need luck and secondly we could use our skills to win.
The casino Will tell you house rule bro so pretty much all the games give the casino the edge it's only fair tho they put up the funds and operate a business where a few of there customer can score big and most of all have fun and be entertain makes it interesting when u get lucky. casino bets obviously has the bigger risk but offer bigger reward but if you don't know yours sports than u should stick with the casino bets.
For me casino bets is always more risky. I've done many sportbet, mostly in football. You can at least have some picture about the outcome in sport and increase your winning chance using some news and knowledge about the team playing. You can't predict the card you will get in casino, or the number that will pop out incase you play dice.
Well it seems that everybody will be answering the same answer here that casino gambling is the more risky one than sportsbetting. Now, I don't even know why this is being discussed here, since all the answers are the same. 
For me casino bets is always more risky. I've done many sportbet, mostly in football. You can at least have some picture about the outcome in sport and increase your winning chance using some news and knowledge about the team playing. You can't predict the card you will get in casino, or the number that will pop out incase you play dice.
I think no doubt it would be casino bets, as these best you cannot control the outcome unlike sportsbetting where you can have some level of control over the outcome. You can choose the team with the better chances of reaching the odds that would make you a winner.
Are you sure you can really control the outcome? It sounds speculative.Tell me , when you got an unexpected result such as when barcelona beaten by a small club with a ridiculous odds below 1.1 against deportivo alaves at home.
Is it what you call as control over the outcome?
I think no doubt it would be casino bets, as these best you cannot control the outcome unlike sportsbetting where you can have some level of control over the outcome. You can choose the team with the better chances of reaching the odds that would make you a winner.
hello,
What is your opinion bout this.
If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win. VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?
What is your opinion bout this.
If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win. VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?
Sportsbooks often have higher spreads meaning that if there is a team that has 90% chance to win often they will only give you odds along the lines of 1.05x or even 1.01, 1.02x. This is because the business they are running is highly volatile, and if they get the odds slightly wrong it can lead to losses on their end.
And also we never knowwhether sports are rigged or not.
So I'd go with sports being more risky, but if you are an experienced tipster that's not the case. Casino is pure luck.
they're both risky especially when you're betting a high amount in gambling but if you're gonna ask me what do I like on those two I'm gonna choose sports betting than casino bets i don't like the ambiance in casino bets It doesn't give me any chills and always losing a lot of money in dice games and poker.
i am agree but for me, i think if casino bets games is something like dice bets, i will choose casino bets games but if the other games beside dice games, then maybe i will choose sports bet because i am not good to play other games. actually i am not too good to place a bets with both and usually i am placing bets in sports bet with my friends and i prefer to place a bets in dice games as i know how to enjoy this games. sports betting and casino bets have its own fans and its really famous in gambling industry.
they're both risky especially when you're betting a high amount in gambling but if you're gonna ask me what do I like on those two I'm gonna choose sports betting than casino bets i don't like the ambiance in casino bets It doesn't give me any chills and always losing a lot of money in dice games and poker.
From experience, i can say it is more risky to bet in Casino because it is more complicated and harder to win. Most of the game in Casino are chance base, though blackjack and poker quite depend on the skill and strategy but at the end it is still decided upon the chance of drawing the right card. Sports bet is quite info base, since there is more chance that a stronger team will win.
hello,
What is your opinion bout this.
If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win. VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?
What is your opinion bout this.
If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win. VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?
Well I'd say casinos are more riskier because it doesn't involve teamwork like most sports games where they cover up for each others weakness. Secondly casino outcomes are most of the time within an instant unlike sports games which last a particular duration before its closure and until it ends you still stand a chance of the results changing in your favor.
Casinos,there's no basis on playing on it ,we don't know when or what specific game were be able to perform well, if will play poker and were skilled or experienced playing it a lot we might win but it still depends. While on sport betting we can do research and analyze team or players record and conditions.
hello,
What is your opinion bout this.
If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win. VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?
What is your opinion bout this.
If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win. VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?
Well I'd say casinos are more riskier because it doesn't involve teamwork like most sports games where they cover up for each others weakness. Secondly casino outcomes are most of the time within an instant unlike sports games which last a particular duration before its closure and until it ends you still stand a chance of the results changing in your favor.
I would consider that regular Casino games would be more risky because with most of the Casino games are rigged or heavily automated so the person playing through the gambling system would lose money from it.
I like sports betting because it allows the group interaction and most of the matches are live so even if it was rigged in most times the match’s video playback will view the rigging and I could see how it happened instead of relying on an automated gambling system.
I like sports betting because it allows the group interaction and most of the matches are live so even if it was rigged in most times the match’s video playback will view the rigging and I could see how it happened instead of relying on an automated gambling system.
hero member
Activity: 2912
Merit: 541
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
in my opinion, both sport or casino bets is the same risk but sport bets need more skills to predict which team will be the winner and for casino bets, i don't think that its require skills to win. both sport and casino bets is a gambling games and we need to spend money to place our bets and we can hope that we can be the winner.
hello,
What is your opinion bout this.
If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win. VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?
What is your opinion bout this.
If for example one match of basketball game ratio is 1.05, so it means it's 95% to win. VS casino game like dice which is also 95% chance to win.
Which one is more risky ?
You've answered your question yourself. If the chance to win is 95% then it's 95% no more no less. In reality it means you will win most likely but the profit will be very small. And don't forget you are risking much bigger amount than you might get in case of winning.
Many gamblers mistakenly take 95% win chance as a guarantee of the positive outcome and when they lose they start complaining that the site is rigged etc. What they forget is that with those odds they still have 5% chance to lose, and that is not zero.
Gambling us risky, some of the games and strategies have calculated risk but its still risk. For me playing risky is playing with big bets and high odds, in that kind of gambling you risk a lot of money and on high odds you never know when will you win. For me this kind of betting can be applay in sports and in casino, its risky when ever you bet high, everything else is entertainment and when we don't risk too much money its not a big risk.
Jump to: