Pages:
Author

Topic: What is the best pool? (Read 1756 times)

hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
cryptoshark
July 25, 2014, 10:06:24 AM
#22
polmine

pps, 1% fee
no downtimes within 7 months
nice graphs, hall of fame
income sharing
merged mining
diffilcuty defined by used port (4128,4064 etc)
great support and forum
huge community
decent pool hashrate (about 4ph now)

member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
July 24, 2014, 07:08:32 PM
#21
thanks for your answer but if i want to join in a p2pool how can i connect to one? is like the others pools, just use their server and putt them on the miner, or is harder than that? and do you think someday p2pool when she hits more hashrate, she will give better profits or is it proportional?
It's just like configuring for any other pool, you put the URL in (usually stratum on 8332 or 9333), your miner name is your direct BTC payout address (and all of your miners can use the same address you don't need to create a new address for each miner), and anything for the password.

And, higher hashrate does not equal higher payouts (necessarily).  Higher hashrate just means possibility of more frequent blocks found.  It's all relative - lower # of miners, lower hashrate, longer between blocks but larger infrequent payouts.  Higher number of miners, higher hashrate, shorter time between blocks but smaller frequent payouts.

For example - we're hashing at 8TH/s.  On BTCGuild (10PH/s pool) we received about .008 - .01 BTC per shift, which was about an hour each, meaning about .23BTC/day.  With P2Pool (1PH/s) there's been 6 blocks found over the past 5 days, and we've gotten 6 larger payouts starting at .11BTC up to .23BTC.  All in total however it's about the same income - 1.05BTC - over the same amount of time.  Your hashrate will determine more about your income than the pool, in most cases.


newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
July 24, 2014, 01:13:36 PM
#20
If you have Antminer S3's; I think your best luck would be with finding your nearest P2Pool node and mining there.  I'm currently mining P2pool on Coincadence.  The operator is active on these boards if there are any issues.  The thing to remember about P2pool is that it takes a long time to start getting payouts to discourage pool hopping.

Otherwise, BTCguild seems good. 

I have my R-Boxes on f2pool for now to see how it does.
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1057
SpacePirate.io
July 23, 2014, 11:37:21 PM
#19
I've tried many a pool, I've had the best luck with ghash.io with the best payout. I've tried btc guild, slush, multipool.us, and p2pool.

hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
July 23, 2014, 11:21:11 PM
#18
I honestly don't know anything bad about ghash.io and cex.io. I used to use them and they seemed fine, I liked their website, their support was good. Aren't they taking measures to stop a 51% attack? Aren't they telling some users to use other pools? What real bad things have they done, that can be proven. I'm not trying to advertise ghash.io or anything but I want to know why they are so bad?

They double spent against BetCoin dice
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ghashio-and-double-spending-against-betcoin-dice-327767

They basically did nothing to prevent 51% and they reached it. Their measure now is to spam messages all over the net telling miners to leave, but not taking any actual measures like preventing new connections or increasing fees.
I've seen that betcoin thing before, I assume that was an employee acting on his own part. They are not exactly going to not let people still use their pool, why would they do that. They are discouraging people from joining, but really thats all they can do without forcing people to leave. I just don't see why everyone hates on them, other than being scared of the 51% attack.

We're not scared. It's simply because they are a bunch of irresponsible and lazy crooks.
Yeah, it was an employee, according to them. They can say what they want.
No one said not let people use their pool, denying new connections is stop new miners from connecting. It's a simple method. They wouldn't be forcing people to leave.
Increasing fees is more of a way of discouraging people to use their pool, and not send out stupid messages. They can do something similar to BTCGuild.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Get ready for PrimeDice Sig Campaign!
July 23, 2014, 10:54:55 PM
#17
I honestly don't know anything bad about ghash.io and cex.io. I used to use them and they seemed fine, I liked their website, their support was good. Aren't they taking measures to stop a 51% attack? Aren't they telling some users to use other pools? What real bad things have they done, that can be proven. I'm not trying to advertise ghash.io or anything but I want to know why they are so bad?

They double spent against BetCoin dice
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ghashio-and-double-spending-against-betcoin-dice-327767

They basically did nothing to prevent 51% and they reached it. Their measure now is to spam messages all over the net telling miners to leave, but not taking any actual measures like preventing new connections or increasing fees.
I've seen that betcoin thing before, I assume that was an employee acting on his own part. They are not exactly going to not let people still use their pool, why would they do that. They are discouraging people from joining, but really thats all they can do without forcing people to leave. I just don't see why everyone hates on them, other than being scared of the 51% attack.
newbie
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
July 23, 2014, 10:37:30 PM
#16
We have tried:

Ghash - nice interface, but did not like what I researched about them or their policies and did not want to continue doing business there.  Stayed about 12 hours, then switched.
Slush's pool - had some connectivity issues every so often, would switch to backups every so often, but fine otherwise.  Smaller pool hashrate meant bigger swings in block times.
Bitminter - same as slush's pool.
BTCGuild - nice interface, liked mining there, no real issues if you want a decent sized proprietary pool to join.  Mined the longest there so far (about a month), but recently switched to P2Pool.

We're currently running in P2Pool for almost a week, and I think we will stay with that.  Looking into setting up our own node as well within the next month to participate in the network.

With the larger pools you get smaller payouts, more consistently, since they can usually find blocks quicker but they have so many people hashing.  With the smaller pools you can go a day or more and find no blocks, then find 2 or three.  It's a roller coaster ride.

With P2Pool you find and connect to a local node which is part of the larger network.  It is decentralized, and I think more true to the spirit of bitcoin, where everyone is contributing to the network and you have no central authority controlling the pool.  Fees are usually nil or very very low (.5% or less).  Right now the pool hashrate is about 1Ph/s, which is small and recently we went almost 2 days without a solved block.  Then, three in the past day.  But, so far the payouts are no worse than BTCGuild over the week, and possibly better by a little on average.  Also like the instant (well, after all confirmations clear) payout right to your address.  No one else is holding our BTC, which could become an issue for the larger pools if the proposed NY State legislation goes through as-is.

My suggestion would be to mine with one of the larger pools (but NOT ghash) for right now to get a feel for mining.  Do some research, know what your payouts will end up being over some time, and then possibly look into P2Pool.  Read up around the P2Pool thread, lots of good info over there.




thanks for your answer but if i want to join in a p2pool how can i connect to one? is like the others pools, just use their server and putt them on the miner, or is harder than that? and do you think someday p2pool when she hits more hashrate, she will give better profits or is it proportional?
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
July 23, 2014, 10:17:51 PM
#15
I honestly don't know anything bad about ghash.io and cex.io. I used to use them and they seemed fine, I liked their website, their support was good. Aren't they taking measures to stop a 51% attack? Aren't they telling some users to use other pools? What real bad things have they done, that can be proven. I'm not trying to advertise ghash.io or anything but I want to know why they are so bad?

They double spent against BetCoin dice
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ghashio-and-double-spending-against-betcoin-dice-327767

They basically did nothing to prevent 51% and they reached it. Their measure now is to spam messages all over the net telling miners to leave, but not taking any actual measures like preventing new connections or increasing fees.
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Get ready for PrimeDice Sig Campaign!
July 23, 2014, 10:15:12 PM
#14
I honestly don't know anything bad about ghash.io and cex.io. I used to use them and they seemed fine, I liked their website, their support was good. Aren't they taking measures to stop a 51% attack? Aren't they telling some users to use other pools? What real bad things have they done, that can be proven. I'm not trying to advertise ghash.io or anything but I want to know why they are so bad?
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 1000
July 23, 2014, 10:11:14 PM
#13
How are they not trustworthy?

Have you been living under a rock for the past couple of months, or are you just making retarded posts to bump up the post count for the signature campaign?
Seriously. Ghash.io and Cex.io is the worst pool/company ever, even worse than deepbit back in the old days. They want to do a 51% attack and double spend (In my opinion).
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
July 23, 2014, 10:06:42 PM
#12
We have tried:

Ghash - nice interface, but did not like what I researched about them or their policies and did not want to continue doing business there.  Stayed about 12 hours, then switched.
Slush's pool - had some connectivity issues every so often, would switch to backups every so often, but fine otherwise.  Smaller pool hashrate meant bigger swings in block times.
Bitminter - same as slush's pool.
BTCGuild - nice interface, liked mining there, no real issues if you want a decent sized proprietary pool to join.  Mined the longest there so far (about a month), but recently switched to P2Pool.

We're currently running in P2Pool for almost a week, and I think we will stay with that.  Looking into setting up our own node as well within the next month to participate in the network.

With the larger pools you get smaller payouts, more consistently, since they can usually find blocks quicker but they have so many people hashing.  With the smaller pools you can go a day or more and find no blocks, then find 2 or three.  It's a roller coaster ride.

With P2Pool you find and connect to a local node which is part of the larger network.  It is decentralized, and I think more true to the spirit of bitcoin, where everyone is contributing to the network and you have no central authority controlling the pool.  Fees are usually nil or very very low (.5% or less).  Right now the pool hashrate is about 1Ph/s, which is small and recently we went almost 2 days without a solved block.  Then, three in the past day.  But, so far the payouts are no worse than BTCGuild over the week, and possibly better by a little on average.  Also like the instant (well, after all confirmations clear) payout right to your address.  No one else is holding our BTC, which could become an issue for the larger pools if the proposed NY State legislation goes through as-is.

My suggestion would be to mine with one of the larger pools (but NOT ghash) for right now to get a feel for mining.  Do some research, know what your payouts will end up being over some time, and then possibly look into P2Pool.  Read up around the P2Pool thread, lots of good info over there.



hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
July 23, 2014, 07:43:29 PM
#11
How are they not trustworthy?

catch up

I think we should all suggest 50btc to him since he doesn't want to do his own research.  Wink

75btc is the best pool Smiley
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1004
Glow Stick Dance!
July 23, 2014, 07:40:19 PM
#10
How are they not trustworthy?

catch up

I think we should all suggest 50btc to him since he doesn't want to do his own research.  Wink
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
July 23, 2014, 07:26:37 PM
#9
How are they not trustworthy?

catch up
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Get ready for PrimeDice Sig Campaign!
July 23, 2014, 07:25:54 PM
#8
How are they not trustworthy?
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1004
Glow Stick Dance!
July 23, 2014, 07:25:37 PM
#7
I like ghash.io, there probably the largest and most trustworthy.

Largest yes. Trustworthy NO.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
July 23, 2014, 07:25:27 PM
#6
I like ghash.io, there probably the largest and most trustworthy.

lol
hero member
Activity: 588
Merit: 500
Get ready for PrimeDice Sig Campaign!
July 23, 2014, 07:24:38 PM
#5
I like ghash.io, there probably the largest and most trustworthy.
hero member
Activity: 574
Merit: 500
July 23, 2014, 07:24:02 PM
#4
slush
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1004
Glow Stick Dance!
July 23, 2014, 07:22:38 PM
#3
BTCGuild, Slush and Eligius have great, reliable, honest pools. BitMinter is nice too but because of its small share of the network, it has more peaks and troughs than larger pools.
Pages:
Jump to: