Topic: What is the most important member of a team in an ICO (Read 220 times)

All the people in the team are very important. The team is the interaction of a group of people who are trying to unite their efforts in order to achieve a common goal and are interdependent with respect to information, resources and skills.

All of these, plus well known investors having interest in the ICO. I just noticed that when big time investors talks about an ICO the project performs well.

In fact, all team members are important to the success of the ICO. It is very important to pay attention to their professionalism to see if they can implement the project.

This is a very curious question. I can guess that there is no one person in an ICO that can be called the main one. CEO will not do anything without blockchain specialists, and financial experts should also cooperate with them. ICO the successful one must have a team of professionals that work all together.

They are all important, hence why it is called a team.

If one of them team is weak, the alt coin will suffer.

I do look very carefully at the advisers. If they are insufficiently experienced I normally will not invest. An adviser has to be someone of much relevance, experience and merit and must be a class above the team.

the most decisive success of an ICO, of course the investors and CEO of the project, such as daneel.io project they have everything to the success of an ICO, if you want to join then visit their website at www.daneel.io

All of them have it own role inside the project, to make them solid each of them needs to work alongside with other members, if you seeking for most
important one, maybe you missed it, because the investors is the first thing in order to have a successful project, without investors all of them would
not function or will just be worthless.

ALL TEAM MUST BE SOLID CAUSE ONE HAND WASHES THE OTHER AND BOTH OF THEM THE  FACE:))))

You need all solid member in ICO groups. But, i think Advisors bring much influence to General People who want invest

But you need a successful product to market in the first place though. So it's kinda hard to say.

Now it's such a time that some excellent projects do not fly out, as delirium with a team of newbie can disrupt the jackpot, so it's worth considering all the factors and rely on intuition

I think everything is important, because to succeed an ICO, all aspects must work together for the development of a project, but I think that the role of an ICO is a successful marketing expert, because they ICO got investors for development

They are all equally important as if one fails, the ICO fails.

Best to just look for a team that excels in all areas.

New coin with great potentials! Do your own research, study your own investment! Good luck,

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-medic-coin-foldinghome-gpu-mining-masternode-coin-2753447

No project will ever work out if they have one brilliant mind and a rest of uninspired team mates. It is important to consider the team as a whole when buying anything, one weak link can break the whole chain.
Both of those are examples of respectable teams, not a one person gig.

Is not about the team discussing who is more important, is about an investor deciding if he is putting money into it or not, and if so, how much. So yes, the individuals do matter in a team.

Each of them has its significant role . This is why it is a team . If one of them is an expert of his craft and the project itself will fail . So something like this

Kinda of a weird question. That's like asking who's the more important member in a business. Of course the CEO is the "boss" but his without his employees he's nothing.

The whole is greater than the sum of its parts, in short.

The reason all these are listed is that their contribution in a team is always significant. Without the CEO, there won't be a team, as he/she is the member who brings all together, pursuing a common goal. Without the developers, there won't be an ICO to be sold and without the marketers, the sales of the project will be so low that its creation would have been a bad investment. Thus, each role plays a substantial role in delivering the end product to the people. You'd better read the whitepaper, the name of the company, and their historic cost more than reviewing their roles. What matters is the project itself rather than the roles. For example, I have two ICOs in my portfolio, who's team did an impeccable job in terms of creating a project and delivering it to the public:
1. LiveEdu - building the world's biggest project-based learning library on any topic. About us. LiveEdu is a project learning platform where content creators teach learners how to build real products.
2. Giftz - https://www.giftz.io/itcoin-black-sale-information. The whitepaper is very well written, the company behind has credibility, as they recently formed an alliance with the preeminent ICO company BlockV. Together, they're bringing royalty rewards program to the blockchain. In other words, when you buy their token, you get buyer power in your Giftz card, which you might exchange for various rewards, groceries, etc.

This is what one needs to be looking for when reviewing the competitive advantage of an ICO, rather than the importance associated with each role.