Pages:
Author

Topic: What is the reason to give me the red trust??? - page 2. (Read 984 times)

legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
Do you think the value of the second post is low Huh
No, that's not what I mean 'low quality'.

I was thinking what did you reply in the topic of gambling, @JollyGood felt uncomfortable with your reply, I thought @JollyGood thought you didn't understand in the game you replied, that's why he warned you there.

I thought that was the problem, so @JollyGood got a little emotional and he thought you were challenging him and forbade you to post on the topic he created.

You should look for other gambling topics, that you really understand about the game to discuss it, that's what you should do before someone gets emotional, so it's not as complicated as it is today, actually the problems you are facing right now, You seek it, for yourself.
HCP
legendary
Activity: 2086
Merit: 4361
I don't think I'm making a big mistake.
You are making a "big mistake"... it's called 'Plagiarism'. Roll Eyes Roll Eyes



Plain and simple, the guy is plagiarizing with text spinners... Roll Eyes Undecided

Plagiarism:
The uplifting news about searching for the best football move wagering alternatives is that the fundamental issue you are probably going to have is that there is just a mind-boggling measure of decision. We know, it is a somewhat wonderful issue to have, yet it is as yet something that necessities exploring.

That is the reason we have gathered elite of what, as we would like to think, are the eight biggest alternatives in this market. Presently, this doesn't imply that our top picks here will reliably have the best chances on the exchange market every single time. No bookmaker can make that guarantee. Paddy Power move markets, for example, could have the best Arsenal move chances and Everton move chances, however be behind contenders on move Premier League advertises somewhere else. The following exchange window could see them be best in an altogether extraordinary arrangement of models. We are stating that since one administrator excels on one of the most recent chances football move showcases, that doesn't mean they will be best for what it's worth.

Our positioning is rather founded on who we think have reliably given the best wagering experience to the football move windows, be that through player move chances, how the football move window is spoken to, advancements like chiefs specials, and how it praises everything else that is accessible on the site, to give a few instances of our models. Also, it is following that cycle we have concocted our finely tuned, deliberately made, top bookmakers for football moves.
Archived


Original:
The good news about looking for the finest football transfer betting options is that the main problem you are likely to have is that there is simply an overwhelming amount of choice. We know, it is a rather pleasant issue to have, but it is still something that needs navigating.

That is why we have compiled a list of what, in our expert opinion, are the eight greatest options in this market. Now, this does not mean that our top picks here will consistently have the best odds on the transfer market each and every time. No bookmaker can make that claim. Paddy Power transfer markets, for instance, could have the best Arsenal transfer odds and Everton transfer odds, but be behind competitors on transfer Premier League markets elsewhere. The next transfer window could see them be best in an entirely different set of examples. What we are saying is that just because one operator does well on one of the latest odds football transfer markets, that does not mean they will be best all around.

Our ranking is instead based on who we think have consistently provided the best betting experience for the football transfer windows, be that through player transfer odds, how the football transfer window is represented,  promotions like managers specials, and how it compliments everything else that is available on the site, to give some examples of our criteria. And it is following that process we have come up with our finely tuned, carefully crafted, top bookmakers for football transfers.
Archived


User has been reported.
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
So what happen now? Hopefully there's a sanction for DT members made a mistake for doing some irrelevant decisions here.

Because that's not fair for a forum user to get a red trust for such action which can be corrected easily.

DT position has been abuse nowadays.

This link might be able to (in part) answer your question.
member
Activity: 135
Merit: 10
So what happen now? Hopefully there's a sanction for DT members made a mistake for doing some irrelevant decisions here.

Because that's not fair for a forum user to get a red trust for such action which can be corrected easily.

DT position has been abuse nowadays.
copper member
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1814
฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.
Negative trust isn't necessary if someone is shitposting otherwise if members hand it out to anyone whom they think is shitposting or spamming then it loses meaning.
When negative feedback is sent even for very small offenses then so many profiles are going to have it and a points is going to reach where people won't care if there account has negative trust or not. It becomes the new normal. Best things to do is:
1. Reporting their posts
2. Ignoring the shitposter
legendary
Activity: 3696
Merit: 2219
💲🏎️💨🚓
For 90 pages Amel spoke Indonesian then stopped.  On the 9/20/2019 2:37:59 PM    password changed they changed their password and didn't post again for 2 months.  When they came back this is the quality of their posts:

Spammers are individuals who only use this forum to make money and do not care about the quality of their posts. But those who respond according to their hearts and minds, they are the ones who deserve to be here. Although bounty managers reduce the number of posts per week, do you guarantee that spammers will reduce? instead it will increase spammers because it simplifies their work. Therefore, spammers are rogue, it's useless if the bounty manager reduces the number of posts.

Now compare it to their first post here:

Hello @JollyGood

I don't think I'm making a big mistake. It's just that maybe the quality of my post was a little worse. Also, if there is any other mistake, please let me know, sir. If you look at my other posts you will understand that the quality in my post is not so bad. I am waiting for your reply.


Thanks

I have been given red trust from this ID
https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/jollygood-1016855


... and their second post:

...
I have no doubt about your prudence. I respect you enough. I assure you not to make such a mistake in the future. I hope you will forgive my mistake and take away my red trust in my account very soon.
Thank you sir.




Amel against stops posting on the 28 January 2020, 01:01:52 and resumes posting on the 09 July 2020, 03:21:35 two days after they change their password three times in ~24 hours, the last time being: 7/3/2020 5:14:19 PM    password changed

Note the quality of writing:

Very meaningful writing you wrote. The text is so well-arranged that it is easy for newcomers to understand. I think it's a big deal to write neatly and pay attention to the grammar. No one can easily understand your twisted or messy words. Write in a few words but highlight the main meaning. Your writing will be successful only when your audience understands it very easily.

On the 18 August 2020, 16:24:17 they attept to join 9 different signature campaigns in the following 12 days.  It is in this time that I first spot the use of the word "Sir" when talking to others:

The spreadsheet is updated. Please take a look and make sure that all info is correct. If you find any issue then please knock me here/telegram @sujonali1819
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13r1Opy4g5-FaPUnYPCciavRo0WsoNJkHamIPmKAB4RY/edit#gid=478778819

I am not allowed sir.. I think I can be allowed but not allowed , thanks sir

The last week of September they attempt to join a further six signature campaigns, then on the first of October, their posting style changes to quoting whole blocks of text from external websites.

Conclusion:

"Amel" hasn't posted in Indonesian in the Indonesian section since they first changed their password a year ago and fell silent for two months.  It's my opinion that the account has changed hands at least twice corresponding roughly to when they recommenced posting after changing their password in Sep '19 and July '20.




I also beleive a NEUTRAL "This account may have changed hands and the post quality has been affected" would suffice.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 7064
I would not give negative feedback in this case, but maybe neutral feedback and report for his posts would be the best thing here,
but I don't think any feedback must be permanent and if OP changes his posting habits than JollyGood will remove his feedback.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1033
@JollyGood, already warned you first about junk replies on the topic: Tennis: French Open 2020, and you move forward again repeating the same thing in the topic: English Premier League Season: 2020/2021, you pissed him off, even though he warned you about trash retaliation, you ignore it.

Should, you shouldn't do it again after @JollyGood reminds you.

After receiving the warning, I did the second post well. Do you think the value of the second post is low Huh I am always trying to improve my skills in English.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
I marked him with a simple neutral warning others not to hire him for sig campaigns.  I think that's fair. 
legendary
Activity: 2072
Merit: 4265
✿♥‿♥✿
I think the neutral mark is not appropriate here.
The OP uses, like some others, paraphrasing posts and does not provide a link to the source. I did not search deeply, but I think that this is not his only such post.



Top 3 Coins Price Prediction Bitcoin, Ethereum and Ripple: BTC upside topped at $11,600

BTC is perched on head of a powerful flexibly divider, so drawback potential is restricted. On the upside, the bulls have the space to move the cost up to $11,600, before it meets a solid opposition level. According to Sentiment, there is an enormous spike in the age expended metric on sixteenth September. Normally, a spike brings about an unexpected value development (could be either sure or negative). In any case, passing by the IOMAP, we can figure that the development will be positive.




Throughout the most recent 10 days, there has been a sharp drop in on-chain advancement action. This is generally a bearish sign. In any case, Bitcoin isn't as reliant on-chain action as Ethereum.

https://archive.st/bbft

source:
https://www.fxstreet.com/cryptocurrencies/news/top-3-coins-price-prediction-bitcoin-ethereum-and-ripple-btc-upside-capped-at-11-600-202009190206









Unless the OP declares that he
Rajarshi Mitra

Paraphrasing text is tantamount to plagiarism.

This is very similar to one more user. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2845817
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1775
@JollyGood, already warned you first about junk replies on the topic: Tennis: French Open 2020, and you move forward again repeating the same thing in the topic: English Premier League Season: 2020/2021, you pissed him off, even though he warned you about trash retaliation, you ignore it.

Should, you shouldn't do it again after @JollyGood reminds you.



@JollyGood, I can only say a case like that is 'Neutral' I think it is more appropriate, for a warning.
Vod
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 3010
Licking my boob since 1970
I agree that your posts do not contribute anything.
That might well be true, but are we going back to the days of giving red trust to shitposters?

I wouldn't, but I'm not going to waste time defending a trivial instance of a sig spammer when there is so much more abuse higher up.
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
Maybe jg should remove it since he is about to be permabanned for plagiarism anyway..

Surprising they don’t know better than to stick their heads up by now..
Another legendary bites the dust..
legendary
Activity: 2702
Merit: 3045
Top Crypto Casino
I agree with most of the replies above that the trust system shouldn't be used to tag spammers.
Anyway, @OP, the negative feedback left by JollyGood is the last thing you need to worry about as, now, you may get banned for plagiarism.

...
No, there is no possibility of it happening. I never copy anyone's post. Maybe he didn't like the quality of my post, that's the problem.
What about text spinners!
I used the first free text spinner I found on google to spin
lovesmayfamilis' comment and here is what I got:

it looks ~100% identical to your post  Huh
legendary
Activity: 3528
Merit: 7005
Top Crypto Casino
I agree that your posts do not contribute anything.
That might well be true, but are we going back to the days of giving red trust to shitposters?  I thought we were all done with that when the merit system was rolled out.  Before that happened, actmyname and I were tagging shitposters left and right, but I never thought it was a good use of the trust system--but it was the only tool a DT member could use to combat them.  I definitely don't think DT (or even non-DT) members ought to be tagging shitposters. 

OP looks like he's got some other reasons he should be red tagged (like trying to buy merits), but his post quality isn't one of them IMO.

@JollyGood, if you continuously leave negative feedback for spammers then most forum members will be tagged. Neutral feedback for such a case is enough
Neutral feedback is fine, but I probably wouldn't even bother with that.  Just ignore shitposters when you come across them.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1033


You just proved the OP correct.  :/

Only by determining the value of a post will you give me red trust Huh I understood what kind of rule this is. People will make mistakes. So if he makes a mistake, he should be killed Huh





Looks like use of some text spinner to me.

Yet this don't look like something which deserve a neg tag from someone like JollyGood how enjoys abusing trust.

No, there is no possibility of it happening. I never copy anyone's post. Maybe he didn't like the quality of my post, that's the problem.


[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
legendary
Activity: 2394
Merit: 2223
Signature space for rent
It's quite surprising to me a Legendary user doesn't know how to quote the reply. Multiple posts in a row against forum rules. You can just merge them in a single post. To be honest, your replies on this thread are enough to mark you as a professional spammer even you don't know what should you write to whom. Your posting behavior is something like "posting to get paid". I am pretty sure if there was a merit system before you become Legendary then most probably you had to spend hundreds of years to become Legendary. I am not saying you deserve red trust for it, but your post doesn't bring any contributions to the discussion really.

@JollyGood, if you continuously leave negative feedback for spammers then most forum members will be tagged. Neutral feedback for such a case is enough, doesn't necessary to write with red that you are ignoring someone. Just click on the ignore button is sufficient, let moderators clean the forum, and help them by reporting spam. Trust system hadn't been implemented to prevent spam.
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1033

... is not appropriate negative trust. Shitposts should be reported to moderators.


I also wanted to say this. Will I be given straight red trust for poor quality of a post Huh




Looks like use of some text spinner to me.

Yet this don't look like something which deserve a neg tag from someone like JollyGood how enjoys abusing trust.

What kind of rule is it to give red trust only because the only one post quality is bad. I did not steal anything here. I did not do any scam.



Wrong use of feedback system. This never deserves a negative tag. If JollyGood doesn't like his spam, he can either report the posts to moderator or simply can put the user in their ignore list (he did that although).
This is second time I'm watching JollyGood is using trust system in wrong way. Previous one was also for same reason if I'm correct. And this tag is from today  Roll Eyes


Here I have not done any harm to anyone because of which I can be given red trust. I will be given red trust only because the quality of one post is bad Huh If I had made a big mistake, I would have compromised. But this is being unfair on me.


[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]
legendary
Activity: 2156
Merit: 2100
Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse
Wrong use of feedback system. This never deserves a negative tag. If JollyGood doesn't like his spam, he can either report the posts to moderator or simply can put the user in their ignore list (he did that although).
This is second time I'm watching JollyGood is using trust system in wrong way. Previous one was also for same reason if I'm correct. And this tag is from today  Roll Eyes
sr. member
Activity: 1288
Merit: 415

For this situation, your post resembles a call to make "however many elective records as would be prudent." Are you genuine? The guidelines of abundance organization sound so that in the vast majority of them they preclude the investment of elective records. This implies if individuals have second records, they ought to show up as isolated profiles. Totally discrete. In any case, administrators don't suggest that. It's simply that individuals make more records to expand their profit. I have seen two client Hhampuz and yahoo62278 both took an interest in one mark crusade. The venture of overseeing more than o e record and meeting the week by week portion isn't a simple errand and you may end up spamming which may decrease your odds of being acknowledged in a lucrative mission.
https://archive.st/b1kx

By chance?
And you rewrite many other people's posts like that?


Looks like use of some text spinner to me.

Yet this don't look like something which deserve a neg tag from someone like JollyGood how enjoys abusing trust.
Pages:
Jump to: