I think Ban has certain legal definition and other sections can be linked with this definition .So in your legal framework ,if there is a punish defined for handing banned material or providing banned services ,it is not easy to detect if someone is using bitcoin for his personal use or tread anonymously.
The rules depend in your country if they banned bitcoin but still accept payment using bitcoin or proscribe the used of bitcoin. There is a chance that you may be punished, pay penalty fee or can be sent to jail of you're caught or proven that you used bitcoin when they banned bitcoin in your country. If your country banned bitcoin it is better to follow the rules or suffer the consequence of your actions.
:)In this respected we have to look and the legitimate controls is that nation completely .for whatever I can tell is the BTC keep a bitcoin wallet its by and large amazing for any state to character you.im an early supporter of a BTC or any crypto cash on a stock trade and it correspondingly shares saying data with the association of that nation .while having an issue with it for instance the state can not be able to show that its a bitcoin center wallet itself .yet as I saying that the begin we should take a gander at the substance of a true blue direction. On the off chance that you share the law message in English we can in like way assess it yet in the event that you say it as a theory it doesn't look great what I can state . 
