Pages:
Author

Topic: What lies beyond ASICs? - page 2. (Read 2217 times)

newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
June 09, 2013, 10:55:55 PM
#21
In the case where its blind luck that decides if your hash is the right one Quantum Computers suffer a major drawback. Since there is no definite "right answer" you cant "cheat" your way to the right hash using quantum functions and the actual calculation is so simple that you wont gain anything from using other properties of quantum mechanics to speed it up.


Can you substantiate your claim in terms of the mathematics involved?  Specifically, how doesn't quantum speedup translate to greater hashing?
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 504
always the student, never the master.
June 09, 2013, 10:33:02 PM
#20
This is based on the notion that bit mining is a lottery.

In the case where its blind luck that decides if your hash is the right one Quantum Computers suffer a major drawback. Since there is no definite "right answer" you cant "cheat" your way to the right hash using quantum functions and the actual calculation is so simple that you wont gain anything from using other properties of quantum mechanics to speed it up.

Its more cost efficient to get inexpensive ASIC's that hardly cost anything to run.

and someone with a brain has answered the question
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
June 09, 2013, 10:29:06 PM
#19
This is based on the notion that bit mining is a lottery.

In the case where its blind luck that decides if your hash is the right one Quantum Computers suffer a major drawback. Since there is no definite "right answer" you cant "cheat" your way to the right hash using quantum functions and the actual calculation is so simple that you wont gain anything from using other properties of quantum mechanics to speed it up.

Its more cost efficient to get inexpensive ASIC's that hardly cost anything to run.
sr. member
Activity: 1610
Merit: 372
June 09, 2013, 10:16:13 PM
#18

I think you just hit the jackpot on buzzword bingo.
actually, that's how you describe the engineering involved.
newbie
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
June 09, 2013, 09:53:38 PM
#17
Threads like this make me giddy with anticipation of the meme's complaining about the new 900000000% difficulty increase since the first asic was invented. We will look back and cherish these memories. lol
sr. member
Activity: 259
Merit: 250
June 09, 2013, 09:48:54 PM
#16
any ASIC is fixed transistor location
fixed transistor sizing.
the routing connections done [aluminum/copper] are custom.
Full-custom allows re-sizing and specific placement of transistors,
optimizing speed, possibly minimizing heat/power.
The fact thet they can even do this in USB allows for a paradigm
with an order of magnitude improvement available,
maybe before full custom.

I think you just hit the jackpot on buzzword bingo.
sr. member
Activity: 1610
Merit: 372
June 09, 2013, 08:56:42 PM
#15
any ASIC is fixed transistor location
fixed transistor sizing.
the routing connections done [aluminum/copper] are custom.
Full-custom allows re-sizing and specific placement of transistors,
optimizing speed, possibly minimizing heat/power.
The fact thet they can even do this in USB allows for a paradigm
with an order of magnitude improvement available,
maybe before full custom.
sr. member
Activity: 259
Merit: 250
June 09, 2013, 08:46:40 PM
#14
full-custom is the next step up from ASIC.
You're talking budgets of Intel/AMD/NVIDIA to build these.
I imagine the budget for a USB full-custom, using way fewer transistors,
would be hella cheaper.
And on a smaller volume scale- think TI/Linear Technologies/Analog Devices/International Rectifier.

I don't see Bitcoin as the driving force for quantum computing,
but Butterfly Labs gets rendered obsolete.
[You'll still need GPU's for SolidWorks and 3D printing]

BFL is full custom ASIC design...
sr. member
Activity: 1610
Merit: 372
June 09, 2013, 08:36:42 PM
#13
Quote
These faster and smaller chips will likely be even more expensive than ASIC's.
not necessarily, see my post above this.
sr. member
Activity: 1610
Merit: 372
June 09, 2013, 08:35:44 PM
#12
full-custom is the next step up from ASIC.
You're talking budgets of Intel/AMD/NVIDIA to build these.
I imagine the budget for a USB full-custom, using way fewer transistors,
would be hella cheaper.
And on a smaller volume scale- think TI/Linear Technologies/Analog Devices/International Rectifier.

I don't see Bitcoin as the driving force for quantum computing,
but Butterfly Labs gets rendered obsolete.
[You'll still need GPU's for SolidWorks and 3D printing]
full member
Activity: 176
Merit: 100
June 09, 2013, 08:34:35 PM
#11
These faster and smaller chips will likely be even more expensive than ASIC's.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
June 09, 2013, 08:19:51 PM
#10
This vision may be years or decades out, but it seems inevitable that as we began to realize the power of quantum computing, its applicability to Bitcoin mining will become all that more salient.

Applied pablovium Phlebotinum (TV Tropes)

Edit Oops mis-remembered, took a while to cross-check  (doesn't help that I'm on a RasPi with two background vanitygen's running). Still pablovium sounds pretty good too.

I totally agree that quantum computing is phlebotinum; however, quantum information processing does exist as a burgeoning science.  The scientific journal Quantum Information Processing is a testament to the field's credibility.  For those who haven't peeked into the machine, a quantum computer may very well serve as a black box that is fueled by pixie dust.  However, those of us who have a deep understanding about quantum computing see the potential it may serve to the bitcoin community.
full member
Activity: 125
Merit: 100
June 09, 2013, 08:06:10 PM
#9
Yep, just faster, smaller chips.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
June 09, 2013, 08:01:04 PM
#8
This vision may be years or decades out, but it seems inevitable that as we began to realize the power of quantum computing, its applicability to Bitcoin mining will become all that more salient.

Applied pablovium Phlebotinum (TV Tropes)

Edit Oops mis-remembered, took a while to cross-check  (doesn't help that I'm on a RasPi with two background vanitygen's running). Still pablovium sounds pretty good too.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
June 09, 2013, 07:59:45 PM
#7

Thanks for pointing this out.  I guess I could specify that I'm curious as to the nature of how quantum computers could be used to mine.  I speculate that they would operate at a higher hashrate.
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
June 09, 2013, 07:55:35 PM
#6
This is how I see the score.

Quantum ComputingClassical Computing
Speed
+++
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
June 09, 2013, 07:53:35 PM
#5
We did this already https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/life-after-asic-227285

But I'm new, so it probably comes up twice a week. Newbie forum is like Groundhog Day (the film), stuff just keeps happening, again and again (and again)^oo.
global moderator
Activity: 3766
Merit: 2610
In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce
June 09, 2013, 07:38:02 PM
#4
Faster smaller cheaper chips
Much, much faster. It'll simply completely eliminate the purpose of gpu mining.
cp1
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Stop using branwallets
June 09, 2013, 07:34:05 PM
#3
Faster smaller cheaper chips
newbie
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
June 09, 2013, 07:32:32 PM
#2
Ok, and that amounts to what? A board with hundreds of chips?
Pages:
Jump to:
© 2020, Bitcointalksearch.org