You already have the answer to the question.
It wont go up in value because of the lazy team behind it. They see how much the profit they made from the ICO and just want to run away taking the money with them.
They are really not the project type for long time holders.
You should seek for something that will gain value short term or long term. Pick one and be sure that if it is short term then withdraw quickly after a good listing.
Topic: what prevents projects from keeping token value? - page 2. (Read 254 times)
Some products are either poorly developed or the team is not serious and the product is unable to make the project keep token values up.
yes, I also do not understand the purpose of some projects that are just fraud even there are projects that have been running but they do not keep their tokens price as if their tokens become shitcoin 
There should be a working product that can really be used by people, Unique and of course useful. They should also be active and their tokens are in good exchange. It's definitely a big advantage to other ICO Campaigns and it is possible that when it comes to listing it comes to price at ICO Price immediately or beyond.
Some products are either poorly developed or the team is not serious and the product is unable to make the project keep token values up.
A portion of these projects would probably be scams or very poor project. But sometimes even if the project is good, there's this human error and it would be the fault of the management that things didn't go well.
Most of the time, you can't stop people from selling.
The market can tell which projects are good and which are bad, and I think there's no stopping it.
The market can tell which projects are good and which are bad, and I think there's no stopping it.
Some research says that %50 of ICO is scam, whereas some says %80 of ICO is scam.
The most important thing to determine value; reality of the project,
then other important factors over token value are:
- Community (telegram activity and so on)
- Influencers involvement
- ICO listing sites and reviews
The most important thing to determine value; reality of the project,
then other important factors over token value are:
- Community (telegram activity and so on)
- Influencers involvement
- ICO listing sites and reviews
Well it is not like all those researches are at least 90% accurate. It just means that the reputation of ICO's are constantly getting damaged because of all these scams and fraudulent cryptocurrencies around. It deals a really heavy blow to the whole market.
Some products are either poorly developed or the team is not serious and the product is unable to make the project keep token values up.
We have to always remember that many projects introduced via the ICO platform are experimental in nature so there is that big possibility of failure. Now, coupled that with the fact that scammers are already here in this sphere so people or investors are not yet so serious in getting into alts. I have no problem with Bitcoin and other top cryptocurrency because I think they have already proven their worth though there are still many non-believers of cryptocurrency (though they might be believing with the blockchain). This year, things are different from 2017 when projects even with less value can easily find investors or token buyers and can rise in the exchanges...this time people are already scrutinizing and many failed the test indeed. In my view, a project can really take time to take off and after the phase of the ICO things can go wrong somehow somewhere because human nature can be setting in. Stories like Tezos and Envion come to my mind on this regard.
There are actually a lot of factors and circumstances that affect the value of a certain token. Community members affects the price, if the community does not trust the project because of slow development people will surely sell and just move to another project. Some projects are also selling their own token to gather more funds since projects need further development and marketing.
Some research says that %50 of ICO is scam, whereas some says %80 of ICO is scam.
The most important thing to determine value; reality of the project,
then other important factors over token value are:
- Community (telegram activity and so on)
- Influencers involvement
- ICO listing sites and reviews
The most important thing to determine value; reality of the project,
then other important factors over token value are:
- Community (telegram activity and so on)
- Influencers involvement
- ICO listing sites and reviews
Well it is not like all those researches are at least 90% accurate. It just means that the reputation of ICO's are constantly getting damaged because of all these scams and fraudulent cryptocurrencies around. It deals a really heavy blow to the whole market.
Some research says that %50 of ICO is scam, whereas some says %80 of ICO is scam.
The most important thing to determine value; reality of the project,
then other important factors over token value are:
- Community (telegram activity and so on)
- Influencers involvement
- ICO listing sites and reviews
The most important thing to determine value; reality of the project,
then other important factors over token value are:
- Community (telegram activity and so on)
- Influencers involvement
- ICO listing sites and reviews
Some products are either poorly developed or the team is not serious and the product is unable to make the project keep token values up.
Jump to: