What to do with the Unsold Tokens? - page 2.

Natalim

hero member

Activity: 3038

Merit: 592

BTC to the MOON in 2019

Quote from: biskitop on January 31, 2019, 09:19:36 PM

still hold, there will definitely be a time when the token will soon be launched into the market exchange. if you are impatient, do you want to send your token to my wallet? certainly not right? because you get it from the results of hard work.

LOL, I'm pretty sure you are not reading.
Unsold tokens means those tokens that are not sold during the ICO, we cannot hold that, it's the team who are holding it
and they will do the appropriate action that is written in the white paper.

If it says that unsold tokens should be burn then they have to do it, it will lower the supply, and will result to a better price.

biskitop

full member

Activity: 686

Merit: 104

still hold, there will definitely be a time when the token will soon be launched into the market exchange. if you are impatient, do you want to send your token to my wallet? certainly not right? because you get it from the results of hard work.

whirlcoin

full member

Activity: 602

Merit: 111

Quote from: aad140386 on January 31, 2019, 03:04:49 PM

I think this is not particularly important. As far as I know, at XRP about 50% of all tokens belong to the founders of the coin. At one time, everyone argued that this is bad and that XRP is not a decentralized cryptocurrency, but nevertheless it is now 2 currency by capitalization on the CMC. I would rather look at the project itself, and not at the distribution of tokens. If the project has a strong team, there is a HYIP around the project and a really lively, necessary idea, then the project will fire. And the distribution of tokens will not play an important role.

The unvalued tokens are to be useless till it will be getting any value but nothing can be done by us without holding the tokens and this is the only thing that we can do by ourself while holding a useless token.

aad140386

member

Activity: 420

Merit: 20

simply getting the job done

I think this is not particularly important. As far as I know, at XRP about 50% of all tokens belong to the founders of the coin. At one time, everyone argued that this is bad and that XRP is not a decentralized cryptocurrency, but nevertheless it is now 2 currency by capitalization on the CMC. I would rather look at the project itself, and not at the distribution of tokens. If the project has a strong team, there is a HYIP around the project and a really lively, necessary idea, then the project will fire. And the distribution of tokens will not play an important role.

rysea2

full member

Activity: 407

Merit: 101

I personally prefer the first option, that all unsold coins will be burned, so I think it will be beneficial for investors and project owners because when the supply becomes smaller the price will also be able to survive. but many people also choose unsold coins to be distributed via airdrop.

randyg29

member

Activity: 330

Merit: 10

http://www.daxico.com/

I think I would suggest to use those 1 and 3 strategy to make the value of the currency to increase the price and to increase the number of people who will gonna use the currency. And I think it will make more sense to get the attention of some investors and see that the value of the currency can really increase in the future just like other platforms they usually do that great strategy.

Naida_BR

member

Activity: 980

Merit: 62

Quote from: semobo on January 30, 2019, 03:26:50 PM

Quote from: nbavba on October 05, 2018, 04:45:56 AM

usually, when the token is unsold, they will airdrop to investors or those tokens will be burn.

Burning the token which is unsolved is the better idea then others because it actually not going to touch the where you after talking even after the sale but if it airdropped to the investors or to the participants to promote more then it will decrease holding current value to further more.

Token burning has its flaws as well and depends on the utility of the project we are talking. If the project needs a reasonable supply in order to make the project work then it is wrong to burn them. I think that a combination of these 3 ways is the best. And probably you can lock some tokens for a certain period that may be unlocked for a sale or to potential investors that achieve a certain trading volume. This raises awareness of your project.

PuertoLibre

legendary

Activity: 1890

Merit: 1003

Quote from: 2chase on January 30, 2019, 07:08:42 PM

I am confused by the fact that many projects initially declare their intention to burn unsold tokens, but when it comes to this, it often happens that the team decides to leave the tokens at their disposal. This is unfair to investors because it greatly reduces the shares of other investors. I believe that this is unacceptable.

Freezing unsold tokens is kinda acceptable if team promise to use this tokens for token development after fixed timeframe. Burned tokens increases revenue for investors but low supply doesn't prevent dumping on exchanges after listing. Sometimes team decides to decrease the bounty&marketing pool for protecting their investors but unfortunately this method doesn't work always.

Yaunfitda

hero member

Activity: 2870

Merit: 594

Quote from: 2chase on January 30, 2019, 07:08:42 PM

I am confused by the fact that many projects initially declare their intention to burn unsold tokens, but when it comes to this, it often happens that the team decides to leave the tokens at their disposal. This is unfair to investors because it greatly reduces the shares of other investors. I believe that this is unacceptable.

If this is the case then surely it's very shady for a project to not burn the supposedly tokens that are not bought, because it will dramatically affect the price of it. They should be call out, no matter what or who is the team behind, specially if it says on the white paper that it should be disposed in the appropriate time and manner.

But so far though, I haven't heard anything, but it doesn't mean that this is not being practiced by projects before. Again, call them out, open a scam accusations in this community and let them answer it.

nur rochid

full member

Activity: 1050

Merit: 100

Quote from: 2chase on January 30, 2019, 07:08:42 PM

I am confused by the fact that many projects initially declare their intention to burn unsold tokens, but when it comes to this, it often happens that the team decides to leave the tokens at their disposal. This is unfair to investors because it greatly reduces the shares of other investors. I believe that this is unacceptable.

as if this is a fraud, then don't be surprised if after the token listing is marketed, the price immediately drops and seems worthless. if it is like that it certainly makes investors disappointed, because besides the loss of time, they also lose in terms of investment

primeluck

newbie

Activity: 38

Merit: 0

They will be burned,the tokens spent by users will be withdrawn from circulations and the discount on services will simply be unavailable.

Gibreil

member

Activity: 805

Merit: 26

It depends upon the developers of the project but most of them are burning the tokens. If they would not burn the tokens, there is a fishy thing behind that. Specially if the unsold tokens will come to the hands of the developers. Most of the investors are asking for unsold token because they want transparency when it come to the number of tokens that circulating in exchanges.

2chase

hero member

Activity: 1082

Merit: 502

I am confused by the fact that many projects initially declare their intention to burn unsold tokens, but when it comes to this, it often happens that the team decides to leave the tokens at their disposal. This is unfair to investors because it greatly reduces the shares of other investors. I believe that this is unacceptable.

andulolika

legendary

Activity: 2310

Merit: 1047

BURN

Twinscoin2017

sr. member

Activity: 1009

Merit: 328

Token needs to be burnt because it is really the best thing to do about the token to avoid an unnecesary used of it because if the token is burnt it is really a pair to investors who invest a big amount into it. I believe that we really need to burnt.

GlobalFuneralCare

jr. member

Activity: 84

Merit: 5

From what we have seen, most ICO projects burn their coins to avoid devaluation after the crowdsale. Another option is to airdrop them among the investors. They will get an equal share of the remaining coins/tokens.

semobo

full member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 146

Quote from: nbavba on October 05, 2018, 04:45:56 AM

usually, when the token is unsold, they will airdrop to investors or those tokens will be burn.

Burning the token which is unsolved is the better idea then others because it actually not going to touch the where you after talking even after the sale but if it airdropped to the investors or to the participants to promote more then it will decrease holding current value to further more.

romero121

legendary

Activity: 3206

Merit: 1213

casinosblockchain.io

With each and every ico, the unsold tokens were buried. With that into calculation only the volume into circulation were calculated. Scam projects might store back the tokens without burning. Those burned tokens were shown to the investors for clarification. Very small percentage at times were distributed as airdrops.

Santri

full member

Activity: 1092

Merit: 101

I don't believe if the team stores unsold tokens for future development. According to me, the alternative way to make price of token stable or more than ICO price, unsold token must be burned because the less the total supply, the higher the price of token on market

astik1

copper member

Activity: 294

Merit: 0

Unsold tokens are only bringing risk in future since investors might not buy another again,this must be burnt and should be by this the possibility of pumping is higher than those coins is still on hand

Owner must be responsible of their tokens or coins because the beneficiaries are the investors and holders that may trust the said coin/tokens

Topic: What to do with the Unsold Tokens? - page 2. (Read 1597 times)