Then why doesn't the government want to legalize bitcoin as a legal tender if you don't think fiat will compete with bitcoin in its use case?
Bitcoin has attracted lot of people's attention for the convenience and innovation it brings as means of payment. I think bitcoin is good to payment alternative which is currently still dominated by fiat, but the better the development, the more users are willing to use it as means of payment.
Because they are too afraid of bitcoin developing and cannot be controlled like fiat, but for me bitcoin is not a competitor to fiat, because bitcoin was not created to replace it, bitcoin is an alternative to fiat and the two are clearly different.
Yes, it is true, but not many countries are adopting bitcoin as a means of payment, although it is true that fiat's dominance will diminish as bitcoin grows.
What bullshit are you talking about, do crypto exchanges nowadays support fiat less often than just crypto? Centralized crypto exchanges especially locally based will support fiat to make it easier for users to make deposits to exchanges, this is what most local exchanges do. Despite all that, crypto exchanges will still exist and will also continue to grow over time. The government at all costs will only centralize it for its own benefit, so say something true.
It seems you misunderstood, I mean the case of fiat and crypto users around the world, isn't fiat money much bigger users now and I never said crypto doesn't support fiat.
I also found out for myself that local exchanges continue to support fiat in terms of deposits and withdrawals, in this case I agree there is a correlation, but in terms of the number of fiat users it is still dominant at this time