50 years is a bit too much. Do you even believe that crypto will be a thing after 50 years? I certainly don't believe that Bitcoin(and the altcoins) would still be around after 50 years. Maybe quantum computing and AI will kill crypto, or maybe crypto will evolve into something completely different.
I totally don't care about what Michael Saylor(or any other crypto whale) would do with his BTC holdings.
Indeed, 50 years is too much and too early to talk about that. I don't know what will happen to crypto in the next 50 years but right now crypto is just a speculative market and there is no reliable asset to hold in the next 50 years including bitcoin. So I have no intention of holding my crypto assets for that long, let alone passing them on to the next generation as many people claim.
Depending on the situation and development of the crypto market at that time, if bitcoin or one of them can become as reliable as gold, I will consider it. But by that time, if they are still speculative assets, I may even exit the market when I reach my goals. Because sticking to speculative assets for the long term is not a wise idea, IMO.
Bitcoin has the most chance of becoming the safest hedge against the worries of the fiat world.
If not for it, then I don't see who
![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
So if there is a choice of sticking to something, it would be Bitcoin.
But I agree - 50 years is long, very long, even for Bitcoin. But I do believe it will outlive most of the market which we see and will see in the future.