Why is not doing that bad? Why is working on this tech without the pressure of a release date a bad thing?
I'm in no rush, it's ready when it's ready and I'll make those announcements when I feel the vision is complete, the tech is ready, we are happy with it, and the dates are achievable.
We have developed tech that no ones even close to having, and that takes time, so it's worth doing right, because from where I'm sitting no one else has other that Satoshi. And the "competition", it's small fry in the grand scheme of things.
You say you sit equal to Satoshi, but yet his implementation and work to develop the blockchain is what your work is based on whether you use the same code or not, for you did not make eMunie before Satoshi's Bitcoin; we must regard the source of our growth before claiming fame from another.
Keep in mind NXT, Ripple, Steller, etc. all have unique code bases written from scratch, with each claiming their "innovation" is superior. Look at Apple and Microsoft, Apple clearly had the better Technology, but Gates played the game better. Sadly, this is the condition of earth
Thank You,Viz.P.S. That anonymous option will bite you in the ass when you try to establish regulation, which is necessary if you are wanting to replace the existing financial systems with your "Electronic Money Units". May I suggest an alternative of "Electronic Monetary Units" as that to me seems more proper, but of course just my opinion 
Also curious, your claim "Highest levels of security that technology can provide".
What's your minimum bit length for your keys and cryptography?
eMunie was never based on blockchain technology...ever, because it doesn't scale, it's wasteful and inefficient.
eMunie is the ONLY tech that doesn't use a blockchain, everyone else took something that Satoshi did and modified, we haven't, and that's why its taken some time.
The anonymity is optional, if it puts a brick wall in our path down the road then it can be disabled, everything is modular and can be plugged in and out without effect to the rest of the system.
Minimum required key length for signatures is 160bit, minimum for encryption is 256bit....and supports up to 512bit for each, so covered as hardware gets faster.
What I'm getting at, is without Satoshi, nor his success with Bitcoin, you wouldn't have made eMunie, can't disregard blockchain when you inherit the principals of decentralization from Satoshi, among others. Many coins have already written from scratch, yet none have surpassed Bitcoin as of yet.
So 512 is your maximum cryptographic output, this isn't highest security possible FYI. Might want to reword your website to be accurate, otherwise it looks like most other coins, even if you did write it from scratch.
Thank You,Viz.
