Hmm...I wouldn't say careless, they were "protected" in exactly the same manner as my own that were stolen, I was just a big target I guess an worth the effort.
Yeah there has been innovation, but nothing IMO that comes close to what we have (of course I'm biased). Whether others think the same remains to be seen in the coming months.
Lol yeah eMunie has been a troll fest that's for sure.
The whole open v's closed debate, tbh I'm happy with the choice I made to keep development closed. Some stuff would of been easier open, other stuff would of been hindered, but I guess it comes down to am *I* happy with the way things have developed, especially with all the drama, and the answer is still yes.
a fair answer - i think its still interesting, but one person can never out innovate an open market, so you should align yourself with that analogy moving forward.
it could be a little bit like a musician writing a song, then coming back months later and saying "what the fuck was i thinking"
the point is if you keep it open, the market can say "what the fuck are you thinking" as you go.
my point is in the end if the market values this entity it will only be based on the "equivalent force of information" perception.
and nothing else.
I have been a part of the beta and founder team for well over a year and to be perfectly honest all the new "innovative" stuff that has turned up in the past 12 months throughout the crypto world I first saw discussed and thrashed out on the Emunie shout box long before they turned up in the real world. The vast majority of those ideas and the way to implement them to my knowledge were actually originally brought up by Dan and thrashed out by the team. The man is a machine, put your jealousy away please it is disgusting.