STO's and ICO's are both the same the type of regulation is has depends on the country.
The only real difference are Non-Utility, Hybrid, or Utility Tokens/Coins. In which Non-Utility and Hybrids both having to be regulated depending on the country some try to say they are a utility token when they are really a hybrid and again still are securities depending on the country.
a "STO" can launch in a country with minor regulations as again it all depends on the country. Don't get caught in the hype.
I do like your conclusion, the most important thing here is the protection of the investors, this is what we missed in the ICO rally, alot of people got burnt and left the space dejected, I personally do not have issue with ICOs but for these developers not to want to be responsible for the money collected from people is the main issue I have, after collecting funds they stopped asking questions from people
Yea that's the most important factor checking where the company is incorporated and wether they have consumer fraud protection in place in such events.
STO's and ICO's are the same, do not be fooled just because a project states to be a STO.
I am thinking the same thing. I think ICO words has used badly. And market needs a new method. But STO built on old ways named ICO. I don't think there is a different between ICO&STO. New and cool words only.
I read about Bolton coin and Desico both claimed an STO project but looked at them many scam accusations are being made, they are both scam to me because they are trying to fool their investors by changing rules everytime.
Yeah it's just a new word people will still get scammed if they don't do the proper research on the projects incorporation. It's kind of foolish that the cryptocommunity is actually falling for this again.