My maximum winning streak in dice was 13 or maybe 14 wins in a row.
I could make some serious money if i only had raised bet 2X on every win, instead of that i hit lots in a row and i lost money at the end.
That's the problem with martingale basically we just keep on betting same amount when we win and we double when we loss, its almost like appreciating a loss and avoiding a win. I could make some serious money if i only had raised bet 2X on every win, instead of that i hit lots in a row and i lost money at the end.
But that said, martingale is one of the best and longest running strategy and people are earning good with it, having some good bankroll with them. Basically I never counted the green streak but I guess around 11-12 would be my max.
I agree martingale with enough bankroll can give you a good run and a good chance of booking a profit. I only have experienced 7 to 8 greens in dice. But I'd rather have series of red and a big green at the end of it since my strategy is x3 at lost and return to base bet when win. But I know this kind of strategy needs a higher bankroll since it consume a lot more when the losing streak appears.
Why do you triple your bet on a loss?
You're going to run out of your bankroll really fast
It's completely unecessary since doubling covers your losses without a problem
You're just shortining the amount of losses your bankroll can take
I've only had 16 losses in a row, not wins as OP
