The problem is, in order for Bitcoin to become a currency everyone will use, it should be stable. I know that you might say that people will still use it because it's not about stability, it's about freedom and technology. I agree with that, but Bitcoin needs to be stable in order for people to treat it like money, and not like an asset.
You fail to understand bitcoin as a speculative asset and bitcoin will never be stable forever. To see the future of bitcoin is not difficult, when this asset is still speculative then its journey will still be one of the best choices. There are separate regulations for countries that want to make bitcoin a currency and I think that will be difficult to happen.
I know that people say that when Bitcoin will be adopted, it should become stable because there is a limited amount of it, but I don't see how it's gonna happen. From what I see people treat bitcoin as an asset to invest and hold and I can't imagine that will change in the future.
Why should it be stable? In economic relations, something that is limited usually has a value that cannot be regulated, because the role of demand and supply will continue to influence its journey, so it is impossible for bitcoin to be regulated regarding its stability.
Why do you guys think Bitcoin will really become the "money of the future" and people will actually use it like one?
From what I see, I think it's possible that people in the future will still trade bitcoin or try to buy as much of it as possible to manipulate the market.
I have never cared about whether bitcoin will become currency in the future or not, what I want to do is collect as much bitcoin as possible, this is in line with the thoughts of our people before such as collecting as much gold as possible, even though the two differ both in terms of price, speculative and profit returns. I chose bitcoin as an asset capable of maintaining value and never thought of making it a global or local currency.