Pages:
Author

Topic: when somebody say bitcoin is not really decentralized give him this info - page 2. (Read 357 times)

jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 5
very bad comparison in my opinion.

for starters file sharing has never been illegal as you put it here. what was illegal was and still is "pirating" which is obtaining an illegal copy of something that has a copyright!

as for owning more bitcoin, those people didn't get those coins out of thin air. they have either paid hard earned cash for them to directly BUY them or they have paid hard earned cash to MINE them. the fact that they believed in bitcoin sooner and longer than others doesn't make it unfair or centralized!!!

and finally when you say peer to peer and file sharing usually the first thing that people think of is either some of these websites like mediafire (which is fully centralized) or torrent network which is smi-decentralized since you still need a server. so it still isn't the best comparison.


your wrong mate peer to peer money come from the idea of of peer to peer file sharing with twist and one peer hold more info and less the same with bitcoins=mine even if you need  money for bitcoins but its was not the point, the point peer to peer money come  from peer to peer file sharing idea

send what i say to expert blockchain or some smart fox in mit he will say you ...you so fucking dumb you even dont know what you talk

and the same time you mislead noobs to understand it in the most simple way..

why some people inveted peer to peer file sharing which always was illegal and kids know this compare to you, because before peer to peer there was central servers which hold mp3,software,movies,and other stuff and the governments very fast and easy shut down this main servers, then the people became more smart and bring tech peer to peer=decentralized why??? you dumb head ass very simple becuase today if the governments want to shut down they need to shut down around 1 billion computers around the world which peer info like software and mp3 and games and other stuff and they cannot shut down billion computers which each computer act as peer=server....its just impossible

you dick head and go ask someone pro in blockchain he will say that you dont have any idea from your bullshit answer...

bitcoin come from the idea of peer to peer file sharing very simple if you dont get this you to fucking dumb with your 5 five starts in this shit forum,,

why peer to peer file sharing come to the world becuase before this the tech share file was central which mean few main servers hold all the movies ,software,mp3 and other stuff and the governments was easy shut them down and end of the story then the people find away which called

peer to peer each computer act as peer /server to share file some hold more some less, and now the governmentsnedd to shut down around 1 billion computers around the world hhhhhhhhhhh fucking dumb dick head ass


its so fucking simple kids on reddit know this and you with all your stars here so fucking dumb

even more send this info to expert blockchain he will tell this is the most clever way to explain noobs why peer to peer is great tech and from where it come


do you hear your self how much shit you talk and you have starts in this forum hhhhhhhh fucking dick head
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
very bad comparison in my opinion.

for starters file sharing has never been illegal as you put it here. what was illegal was and still is "pirating" which is obtaining an illegal copy of something that has a copyright!

as for owning more bitcoin, those people didn't get those coins out of thin air. they have either paid hard earned cash for them to directly BUY them or they have paid hard earned cash to MINE them. the fact that they believed in bitcoin sooner and longer than others doesn't make it unfair or centralized!!!

and finally when you say peer to peer and file sharing usually the first thing that people think of is either some of these websites like mediafire (which is fully centralized) or torrent network which is smi-decentralized since you still need a server. so it still isn't the best comparison.

I think this is good comparison.. why you think that it is bad comparison??
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
Thanks very informative and useful post..well we must spread  this info all over the world..it will  heplful for noob.. newbies must  know all info about bitcoin.. be aware and stay  away from scammers.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 5
very bad comparison in my opinion.

for starters file sharing has never been illegal as you put it here. what was illegal was and still is "pirating" which is obtaining an illegal copy of something that has a copyright!

as for owning more bitcoin, those people didn't get those coins out of thin air. they have either paid hard earned cash for them to directly BUY them or they have paid hard earned cash to MINE them. the fact that they believed in bitcoin sooner and longer than others doesn't make it unfair or centralized!!!

and finally when you say peer to peer and file sharing usually the first thing that people think of is either some of these websites like mediafire (which is fully centralized) or torrent network which is smi-decentralized since you still need a server. so it still isn't the best comparison.



for starters file sharing has never been illegal as you put it here. what was illegal was and still is "pirating" which is obtaining an illegal copy of something that has a copyright!

as for owning more bitcoin, those people didn't get those coins out of thin air. they have either paid hard earned cash for them to directly BUY them or they have paid hard earned cash to MINE them. the fact that they believed in bitcoin sooner and longer than others doesn't make it unfair or centralized!!!

and finally when you say peer to peer and file sharing usually the first thing that people think of is either some of these websites like mediafire (which is fully centralized) or torrent network which is smi-decentralized since you still need a server. so it still isn't the best comparison.

[/quote]

your wrong mate peer to peer money come from the idea of of peer to peer file sharing and one peer hold more info and less the same with bitcoins even if you need to money for bitcoins but its was not the point the point peer to peer file sharing is from bitcoin come

send what i say to expert blockchain or some smart fox in mit he will say you ...you so fucking dumb you even dont know what you talk

and the same time you mslead noobs to understand it in the most simple way..


do you hear your self how much shit you talk and you have starts in this forum hhhhhhhh fucking dick head
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1293
There is trouble abrewing
very bad comparison in my opinion.

for starters file sharing has never been illegal as you put it here. what was illegal was and still is "pirating" which is obtaining an illegal copy of something that has a copyright!

as for owning more bitcoin, those people didn't get those coins out of thin air. they have either paid hard earned cash for them to directly BUY them or they have paid hard earned cash to MINE them. the fact that they believed in bitcoin sooner and longer than others doesn't make it unfair or centralized!!!

and finally when you say peer to peer and file sharing usually the first thing that people think of is either some of these websites like mediafire (which is fully centralized) or torrent network which is smi-decentralized since you still need a server. so it still isn't the best comparison.
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 5
spread this info its help noob and good people not fall to traps and stay away from scams and get the idea how all started from where the idea of bitcoin and why decentralized tech will save us in this planet...


if somebody dont get this i will try to explain in more easy way
jr. member
Activity: 56
Merit: 5
when he say its really not decentralized its becuase he some how cannot figure by him self how tech work very simple

to help other in the same position

all came from peer to peer file sharing like napster which was illegal.

peer to peer in reality its computer to computer without middle man like file sharing peer to peer= decentralized tech

so when he say its not really decentralized there is no defention to this why either it yes or not, ether it peer to peer or not very simple.

in file sharing peer to peer some computers hold more info to share then other this is make it some how centralized off course not its the nature of peer to peer decentralized tech.....

the same with bitcoin peer to peer or computer to computer(wallet to wallet) some hold more bitcoins some less like file sharing peer to peer, so when he say its really not decentralized he mind dont understand tech very simple, its  decentralized because it peer to peer very simple and peer to peer tech some peer hold more and some peer hold less if it money like bitcoin or file sharing or other stuff.

peer to peer or computer to computer which the same meaning called decentralized-------------->>>

as smart mind know the idea of peer to peer money came from the idea of peer to peer file sharing but lets go more deep for a second,

from where the idea of peer to peer file sharing come, before this was central server/s(central tech) which hold all the movies and mp3 music and other file like software and so on,,,there is no private computers act as server(peer computer), which mean the governments shut down preety fast the main servers that hold all the info which is easy for them but when its peer to peer and there is not central server they need to shut down miilion of computers which share and act as peer on the world and this is impossible as we know


....


for all the noobs here its great start point to get deep and get simple idea from where and why and where its lead us
Pages:
Jump to: