When the bounty campaign is weak, but the ICO is successful - page 2.

susila_bai

hero member

Activity: 1260

Merit: 524

Quote from: Crankautist on October 07, 2017, 11:36:26 AM

Ever though of the idea that dev and friends are investing in their own ico to p&d on you people afterwards?

^
Yes this is it for sure.

Perfectly said, This is the only way they can invest high and create a big advertise of getting high investment and listing the coin with high price and trading high and when sufficient users start to buy they start to shift to them and leave it. so this type of ICO should not be touched even if they are giving you 10x profit , even if you entered then sell of immediately even on what ever profit you get as suddenly one day you will see it is going down to 1 sat and then dead.

jamirrah

full member

Activity: 169

Merit: 100

I think its because lots of investor is still looking on project's whitepaper and other assets than on how it is advertise. Even an ICO did have a very poor advertising and marketing strategy if people who have read their whitepaper got interest they would still succeed. Just my opinion.

asba

full member

Activity: 252

Merit: 100

Good bounty campaign doesn't mean that they will be 100% successful. Probably they get investors from other resources.

Baofeng

legendary

Activity: 2576

Merit: 1655

Quote from: Crumple Cat on October 07, 2017, 01:43:31 PM

Quote from: peter0425 on October 07, 2017, 12:30:48 PM

Quote from: Crumple Cat on October 07, 2017, 11:27:50 AM

Hi guys,

Perhaps you have encountered situations when some projects have a weak or completely failed bounty campaign, but ultimately they hold a successful ICO. Why is this happening?

For example, the project Ambrosus with whom I happened to deal. In the comments to the bounty campaign there are complaints that nothing can be understood in the campaign rules. And there really is not as usual. Probably therefore the number of participants in the signature campaign, Twitter and other programs is minimal, but the project has already raised more than 100000 ETH. Is this an exception or is it so often?

Ok here is the thing. The bounty has minimal participants but it has raised a lot of funds. I think I would join that campaign, Why? because you are very lucky that the tokens will be divided among few participants. So as a result each one of you will get a lot of tokens. As compare to a bounty that has a lot of participants but if you are going to divide them it will result to like .010 cents or less per token. Did you get the idea?

The fact is that in this campaign everything is fixed and based on the Swiss franc, and not divided as usual among the participants. And the conditions are good enough. In particular, in the social media campaign.

This maybe one of the factors that why the project didn't get enough traction from the community. And you also said that the rules are not clear, hunters here wants the bounty to be divided and its fixed then there is really a disconnect from the community.

Or maybe there are a lot of hype around this project before the actual ICO that's why they got huge investments from the very beginning. I do think that pre-Marketing has something to contribute to the success eventhough the bounty campaigns has little participants.

bongiu

full member

Activity: 434

Merit: 102

In my opinion and experience, that is something that doesn't happen quite often but sometimes it happens because of the bounty campaign manager Undecided

thepo1m

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Bounty do help an ICO but do not guarantee success, a sound idea and great team is a very good advantage for any project and remember there are several ways to promote one project apart from Bitcointalk

happyValentine

full member

Activity: 392

Merit: 101

Quote from: Crumple Cat on October 07, 2017, 11:27:50 AM

Hi guys,

Perhaps you have encountered situations when some projects have a weak or completely failed bounty campaign, but ultimately they hold a successful ICO. Why is this happening?

For example, the project Ambrosus with whom I happened to deal. In the comments to the bounty campaign there are complaints that nothing can be understood in the campaign rules. And there really is not as usual. Probably therefore the number of participants in the signature campaign, Twitter and other programs is minimal, but the project has already raised more than 100000 ETH. Is this an exception or is it so often?

It is possible that such companies have an arrangement with very big investors. And the social company is not very important then.

Crumple Cat

full member

Activity: 364

Merit: 138

dApps Development Automation Platform

Quote from: peter0425 on October 07, 2017, 12:30:48 PM

Quote from: Crumple Cat on October 07, 2017, 11:27:50 AM

Hi guys,

Perhaps you have encountered situations when some projects have a weak or completely failed bounty campaign, but ultimately they hold a successful ICO. Why is this happening?

For example, the project Ambrosus with whom I happened to deal. In the comments to the bounty campaign there are complaints that nothing can be understood in the campaign rules. And there really is not as usual. Probably therefore the number of participants in the signature campaign, Twitter and other programs is minimal, but the project has already raised more than 100000 ETH. Is this an exception or is it so often?

Ok here is the thing. The bounty has minimal participants but it has raised a lot of funds. I think I would join that campaign, Why? because you are very lucky that the tokens will be divided among few participants. So as a result each one of you will get a lot of tokens. As compare to a bounty that has a lot of participants but if you are going to divide them it will result to like .010 cents or less per token. Did you get the idea?

The fact is that in this campaign everything is fixed and based on the Swiss franc, and not divided as usual among the participants. And the conditions are good enough. In particular, in the social media campaign.

coingrow

full member

Activity: 364

Merit: 102

Most of the ICO projects hire a bounty manager to manage their campaign. Now the caliber of the bounty manger should not speak about the quality of the core team for the project. For instance, the bounty community of blackmonocrypto was very unhappy and they all suspect that bounty tokens were diverted to false accounts of people who did not even participate in the ICO. On the otherhand, the hardcap of BMC which was 30mil was easily achieved. In the case of BMC, they had hired ICOREWARD team to manage the bounty, who are very unprofessional and rude towards the bounty community.

youdacapt

sr. member

Activity: 1890

Merit: 295

GOD is TRUE

Quote from: PhucS on October 07, 2017, 01:05:43 PM

In my opinion, this is also possible by ICO projects when released, the development team of the project not only advertised by the campaign bonus on this forum they also advertise, introduce their ICO project on the social networking site, and also be a direct live promotion in their place. Or it could be that the manager of the bonuses campaign is not well managed, but people still see the potential of project through the external ads or blog posts are not included in the campaign bonus. This is just my personal opinion Cheesy

Some projects like LNK and Idice have proven to be good prices despite scammed and even red trust charges from DT2, I do not really understand this but should if the project wants total success it should be perfect in promotions, there should be no stains at all, because they spend capital for project development.

PhucS

sr. member

Activity: 742

Merit: 250

In my opinion, this is also possible by ICO projects when released, the development team of the project not only advertised by the campaign bonus on this forum they also advertise, introduce their ICO project on the social networking site, and also be a direct live promotion in their place. Or it could be that the manager of the bonuses campaign is not well managed, but people still see the potential of project through the external ads or blog posts are not included in the campaign bonus. This is just my personal opinion Cheesy

anasso

full member

Activity: 224

Merit: 100

sometimes it's compaign rules that affect the number of participant!

and if devs are confident, it's also a reason to doesn't any bounty!

peter0425

sr. member

Activity: 2618

Merit: 439

Quote from: Crumple Cat on October 07, 2017, 11:27:50 AM

Hi guys,

Perhaps you have encountered situations when some projects have a weak or completely failed bounty campaign, but ultimately they hold a successful ICO. Why is this happening?

For example, the project Ambrosus with whom I happened to deal. In the comments to the bounty campaign there are complaints that nothing can be understood in the campaign rules. And there really is not as usual. Probably therefore the number of participants in the signature campaign, Twitter and other programs is minimal, but the project has already raised more than 100000 ETH. Is this an exception or is it so often?

Ok here is the thing. The bounty has minimal participants but it has raised a lot of funds. I think I would join that campaign, Why? because you are very lucky that the tokens will be divided among few participants. So as a result each one of you will get a lot of tokens. As compare to a bounty that has a lot of participants but if you are going to divide them it will result to like .010 cents or less per token. Did you get the idea?

redhondaxrm125

full member

Activity: 266

Merit: 100

Quote from: Crumple Cat on October 07, 2017, 11:27:50 AM

Hi guys,

Perhaps you have encountered situations when some projects have a weak or completely failed bounty campaign, but ultimately they hold a successful ICO. Why is this happening?

For example, the project Ambrosus with whom I happened to deal. In the comments to the bounty campaign there are complaints that nothing can be understood in the campaign rules. And there really is not as usual. Probably therefore the number of participants in the signature campaign, Twitter and other programs is minimal, but the project has already raised more than 100000 ETH. Is this an exception or is it so often?

I have seen quite a few already. And like you, i have been asking this question in my mind also. But if you think about it, if the campaign is junk, then it reflects to the devs and their ICO. Which means they suck. So it would be suspicious if they would get that much investments with their not so good project. So i think they may be the ones that are investing big percentage of the total funds collected.

~Bitcoin~

legendary

Activity: 994

Merit: 1000

There are many ICOs which have collected lots of fund even without proper bounty campaign, they might run signature campaign for few weeks and if they have good whitepaper and team behind than only few investor can just make their ICO successful.

There are many other forms of advertisement available other than bounty campaign in this forum from which ICO can get targeted traffics.

bhoybitcoin

full member

Activity: 336

Merit: 100

“Join The Blockchain Revolution In Logistics”

I think maybe if the ico is more on promising ideas but lack of strategy that is the time that the ico will failed. Media campaign is a big part of the ico's success. So if that ico have both the strategy plus good management then it will be a success.

Crankautist

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Quote from: MMysterious on October 07, 2017, 11:42:23 AM

Maybe some ICO's have poor management thus making it a failed campaign and less participants joined them but in their own place or area maybe they advertise the project and could be the reason why it was successful.

No - definitely no. Like 1000% no. Luls

MMysterious

sr. member

Activity: 972

Merit: 255

Bear season or just the beginning

Maybe some ICO's have poor management thus making it a failed campaign and less participants joined them but in their own place or area maybe they advertise the project and could be the reason why it was successful.

Crankautist

member

Activity: 98

Merit: 10

Ever though of the idea that dev and friends are investing in their own ico to p&d on you people afterwards?

^
Yes this is it for sure.

Crumple Cat

full member

Activity: 364

Merit: 138

dApps Development Automation Platform

Hi guys,

Perhaps you have encountered situations when some projects have a weak or completely failed bounty campaign, but ultimately they hold a successful ICO. Why is this happening?

For example, the project Ambrosus with whom I happened to deal. In the comments to the bounty campaign there are complaints that nothing can be understood in the campaign rules. And there really is not as usual. Probably therefore the number of participants in the signature campaign, Twitter and other programs is minimal, but the project has already raised more than 100000 ETH. Is this an exception or is it so often?

Topic: When the bounty campaign is weak, but the ICO is successful - page 2. (Read 671 times)