The problem in this case is that I think they are just trying to continue to cover it up with some definitions that seem to illustrate under CBDC that the concept is different from fiat but at the end of the day, if we really understand more about this, it will all lead to the same thing with a more updated system but the scheme remains the same.
I think even if the government wants a special definition of CBDC in the end, the result will still be the same where they will not be able to deceive forever about CBDC considering when people who have been in crypto for a long time should realise immediately that CBDC is just a tool used by the government to regulate the financial system differently but with the same method regardless of the different definitions applied, the method is still the same.
I mean it's a stablecoin that is managed by the government, so it's basically fiat. I mean you do not have all your money in cash mostly right? It's in a bank somewhere, and you use your phone app, or your card to buy something, even something as simple as a cup of coffee, some people do use cash, but not everyone, commonly people use cards.
However, if we could have CBDC, basically a stablecoin by the government, that would also be accepted in the banks as well, which means you could be using the same card to spend. What changed in your life? You did the same thing using the same payment option and nothing has changed, I think that should be the most important part and I do not think that it will matter in the end. As long as the government is making a money, it will be exactly as the fiat for me, doesn't matter how the yare doing it, it doesn't matter who has it or how it's made, they have full control, and as long as they have full control, it's fiat for me.