They COULD certainly start doing those things. What I was saying is that based on their current model, it would be impractical for them to pay out interest. However, if there were to start value-added services like you mentioned then it would maybe become more viable.
We...the community...could start forcing these value-added services by demanding them directly or indirectly through the desire to keep deposits offline if exchanges don't pay interest on balances.
They will never pay the interest and all to the users mate. First you need to leave out of the banking usage who are scamming the users and taking their money to share market and other things mate.
You do not have the voice to ask them but you guys came here to ask exchanges to pay the interest since you are using it make the profit with the manipulation on trading site bro.
Sorry friend, I refuse your immediate rejection of what's possible. Each of us has a voice, and we're louder when we're talking in unison. And our bitcoin deposits are even louder than our voice. A coordinated ban on exchanges in return for something as simple as interest for risk taken is certainly possible.
banks give interest because.
when someone deposits $1000 for a year
a bank is allowed to create $9000 as "credit" that year to give out as a loan which normally has a interest rate of 5%+
meaning the loan receiver lets say on a $9k loan over 9 years would have to pay back (pen and paper math) $1000+$450 in the first year
and from that $450 the initial depositor would get $50 (if their deposit account offered a 5% return)
but here is how bitcoin is completely different to banking
in bitcoin no one can CREATE new bitcoin based on deposits or individual credit agreement.
We don't have to adopt the bad of the banking industry - the creating of money based on credit is a cancer on the wealth of society. There's no place for it in cryptocurrency.
that faucet is a ponzi
in short the faucet is a HYIP(ponzi) SCAM.
and so the scammy faucet habBear is advertising
without any contractual agreement for the funds receiver(faucet payout) to re deposit anything +interest to then repay the initial depositor
the faucet is a ponzi because its then a end game for those that initially deposited if no new depositers keep the ponzi alive
By your rationale and logic here every bank in the fiat world is a ponzi scheme because you and your bank don't have a contract that defines exactly how much interest they'll pay you on your deposits.
If you're going to attack me, do so via PM. Your off-topic rants aren't welcome on this forum. I have no vested interest in the faucet site I mentioned, and their 4% per year is hardly "High Yield". Let's keep our comments factual, thanks frank!
how are they supposed to pay you interest they cant even invest those coins, no company contractor works and pays his employees with bitcoins, and no exchange is also an investmentbank, the risk would even get higher if the exchanges would have to lend it.
I'm not sure I follow you, any entity can pay any other entity (customer, employee, etc.) in Bitcoin or any other currency.
Banks started offering interest (150-200 years ago) to compensate depositors for the risk they are taking. Fractional lending is a perversion of the banking industry that didn't evolve until the last 100 years or so (since fractional reserve banking was introduced).
Cryptocurrency exchange depositors take on the greatest risk of ANY bank customer - these depositors give up the right to have private keys because they are uneducated about the system. These people should get compensation for taking on this risk, yet the exchanges offer nothing for us.
The exchanges aren't for the cryptocurrency industry when they aren't for rewarding customers for their trust.