Author

Topic: Where are the new Custom Hardware vendors? (Read 3415 times)

full member
Activity: 131
Merit: 100
October 29, 2013, 03:37:15 AM
#63
People are finding out it's not as easy to create a brand new product as they would have you believe, that's what's happening.  Even the people using others IP can't bring products to market (Look at Bicknellski's failed ventures) with all of the parts already laid out for them, much less create anything from scratch.

Surprise!  It actually requires skill, commitment and dedication to create a new product and bring it to market.



1) create product [check]
2) bring to market [....uh....check?]
3) fulfill all pre-orders and sell from in-hand stock [i guess in two weeks...right now you are shipping preorders 2-4months later than initially 'promised'/suggested]
4) take preorders on next-gen product that is rediculously overpriced by today's standards, and promise to deliver it before the 110nm preorders are filled

Can you point to a vendor that's doing number 3 now?  Are you seriously complaining that because demand is exceeding supply, it is somehow the vendors fault?

As for 4, I have no idea what you are talking about. BFL doesn't have any 110nm products and again, are you seriously complaining about the fact that people are paying money for a given product and the vendor charges what people will pay... but it's "overpriced" even though people are paying it?  If it was overpriced, people wouldn't buy it - that is simple economics.  If you think it's over priced, don't buy it.  The majority of the market disagrees with you, so that makes you the one that is incorrect. 

So basically points 3 and 4 are invalid and you have proven my point.


Thanks,

thanks to my cc company to force BLF get my money back, BLF is now sending devices completely usefull that never make ROI.

I've finished make business with this fraudolent company.  Angry
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
October 28, 2013, 06:47:53 PM
#62
People are finding out it's not as easy to create a brand new product as they would have you believe, that's what's happening.  Even the people using others IP can't bring products to market (Look at Bicknellski's failed ventures) with all of the parts already laid out for them, much less create anything from scratch.

Surprise!  It actually requires skill, commitment and dedication to create a new product and bring it to market.



Hi Inaba! How many units have you shipped today?
vs3
hero member
Activity: 622
Merit: 500
October 28, 2013, 05:58:09 PM
#61
*open-source cant be difficult, since most designs are based on FPGA code, right? I would imagine it cant be difficult to make chips for $1 a peice that are a basic design (exactly what avalon and asicminer did IMO)*

Just FYI - I'm not sure if you've seen this:

Quote
https://mega.co.nz/#!GIF1gYZK!M_8JowhsGc6wc2b3fsRHVCdst5w8UC0M2yq1RgHwDV8

Here's source code "as is" of all my fpga-related work.
This is a wonderful gift to the community, bitfury.  I'll be the first to say thank you!  It is a shame that it is hidden away in a post on this forum.  Do you plan to give it a proper home on your website, and/or github?

I did not see a license specified in the archive.  That would be helpful to people, so they know what they are allowed to do with the code.

Congratulations on your achievement!  Here's to hoping the first run of your ASICs runs as furiously as your name implies.

License - no any restrictions - do whatever you want both commercial and non-commercial.

Well - to make great announcement of bitstream - there's some docs should be written, porting, etc. really not much people can understand, maybe even some license notice if taken so seriously. I don't remember exactly to whom (but can look on skype) - but I gave it I think in Feb 2013 to people who appeared to be skilled in FPGA. and till today no results and no announce. I doubt they really wished to spend effort required :-(


So, there are good places to start from. (and bitfury's is not the only source available - if you search the forums there are more fpgaminer and related posts with references to such designs)
legendary
Activity: 1379
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
October 28, 2013, 03:40:56 PM
#60
  Even being optimistic, mid-November delivery offers only 4, maybe 5 months before the machine costs more to run than it produces, in that time span making back 70% of the price I'd have to pay today isn't that appealing. 


The problem is not that in 5 months these units will be bricks, but that at current price and current BTC value november units will not break even in BTC terms.

November Jupiters should cost around 3K USD  right now to have some chance of breakeven-ing.

spiccioli
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
October 28, 2013, 03:21:05 PM
#59
The police are coming for Josh, NEEE NAAA NEEE NAAA can hear them now.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
October 28, 2013, 02:50:20 PM
#58
This doesn't give me much faith...

Faith in what?

Quote
So Bitmine is selling Coincraft, on which you'll be losing money within three months of the optimistic December ship date at current price.  Will never return price paid.

AsicMiner has decided that offering massive USB hubs is an incentive to keep buying their bitsticks.  Doing some math, right now the 1.75 BTC price will net you 50 sticks + hub.  Running this through the next 180 days will likely net you less than 1BTC, so you'll never get back your 1.75BTC as after that estimate the per difficulty earnings are just plain sad.

BlackArrow isn't offering anything worth buying unless BTC rises in price dramatically.  Hedging hopes on a future price increase is optimism I can't afford anymore.

Anyone marketing to only China is basically useless to the rest of us who are stateside (which I think was part of the BFL appeal) since that means we'll likely see a markup between that market and ours.

Yeah, people aren't going to sell you free money. If they have profitable chips, they will mine with them.  Why would you expect anything else?

Quote
Inaba was indeed right to say this is a complex process and it appears most who enter the field do not succeed

What are you talking about?  Basically everyone who's tried to make ASICs has succeeded.  Avalon,  ASICMiner, Bitfury, KnC, BTCGarden.   I'm pretty confident that Hashfast, Cointerra and ActiveMining will have chips at some point, and so will bitmine.  Even Labcoin seems to have working chips (although in that case we can't rule out a total scam).

Inaba has no idea WTF he's talking about.  He's spouting total nonsense to justify his total (and likely deliberate) failure. No other company with their own chips, other then bASIC has come anywhere near failing as badly as BFL.

How, obviously having working chips and selling them at a price where their customers will actually make money are totally different things.  But they're not trying to make their customers money, they are trying to make money. And in that sense they've succeeded really well.

Quote
Seriously, because I can't find one, can anyone realistically point me towards anyone selling hardware that will at least pay for itself, even removing exchange rates and going purely on a BTC-for-BTC basis?  Because I don't see that - anywhere.

What are you expecting? Why are you surprised you can't find anyone who wants to give you free money with no risk?

Quote
People can stick to their altruism, good of the network, believe in Bitcoin mantras until they are blue in the face - nothing in the mining part of BitCoin looks like anything more than a bunch of greedy kids who keep getting burned and then back in bed with the same one liners and pre-order promises.  I'm all for BTC expanding, but much like I object to country clubs I see no valid reason to pay into a system where my effort to "support the network" is leading towards someone with newer hardware making cash at my expense.  Better to buy and spend BTC at businesses, which in the end will do a ton more for the cause than buying another piece of hardware, lining the pockets of vendors who look like a group of one hit wonders who will walk away from BTC with a pile of cash and no regrets.

... What?

The first companies to launch ASICs sold units at low prices in order to fund their development costs.  That worked out well for Avalon customers and OK for KnC customers, and BFL chose to rip off their customers instead of delivering products in a timely fashion.

But that window has closed. It was never going to stay open forever.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
October 28, 2013, 12:59:55 PM
#57
Seriously, because I can't find one, can anyone realistically point me towards anyone selling hardware that will at least pay for itself, even removing exchange rates and going purely on a BTC-for-BTC basis?  Because I don't see that - anywhere.

The KnC offer looks pretty good. They've got a working product, and if they can deliver the next batch in November as promised, I think there's a high probability that it'll pay for itself in BTC. Part of that is due to the recently runup of BTC value. Two weeks ago you'd have had to pay too many BTC for a KnC order.

Have you happened to check the now almost 1000-page KNC thread?  Smiley  All is not rosy in KNC-land for everyone with various levels of build quality, issues with mining software support, differing hardware functionality between versions of the same machine...  I don't have much faith in them considering there are hosted miners that they can't keep hashing or even get online for early orders.  Even being optimistic, mid-November delivery offers only 4, maybe 5 months before the machine costs more to run than it produces, in that time span making back 70% of the price I'd have to pay today isn't that appealing. 

Yes KNC delivered, yes they were close to on target with shipping, but that has been a twisty road to follow and is not one that looks worth going down. 

And in that same logic, in two weeks BTC may tank and hover back in the ~150 range.  The folks pumping cash into keeping the price up aren't going to be there forever.
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
October 28, 2013, 12:50:07 PM
#56
Seriously, because I can't find one, can anyone realistically point me towards anyone selling hardware that will at least pay for itself, even removing exchange rates and going purely on a BTC-for-BTC basis?  Because I don't see that - anywhere.

The KnC offer looks pretty good. They've got a working product, and if they can deliver the next batch in November as promised, I think there's a high probability that it'll pay for itself in BTC. Part of that is due to the recently runup of BTC value. Two weeks ago you'd have had to pay too many BTC for a KnC order.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
October 28, 2013, 12:33:02 PM
#55
This doesn't give me much faith...

So Bitmine is selling Coincraft, on which you'll be losing money within three months of the optimistic December ship date at current price.  Will never return price paid.

AsicMiner has decided that offering massive USB hubs is an incentive to keep buying their bitsticks.  Doing some math, right now the 1.75 BTC price will net you 50 sticks + hub.  Running this through the next 180 days will likely net you less than 1BTC, so you'll never get back your 1.75BTC as after that estimate the per difficulty earnings are just plain sad.

BlackArrow isn't offering anything worth buying unless BTC rises in price dramatically.  Hedging hopes on a future price increase is optimism I can't afford anymore.

Anyone marketing to only China is basically useless to the rest of us who are stateside (which I think was part of the BFL appeal) since that means we'll likely see a markup between that market and ours.

Hold your pitchforks, but this points to a few things.  Inaba was indeed right to say this is a complex process and it appears most who enter the field do not succeed (this is a hardware story, it's a shitty field at times).  But those who do succeed can't bear to hit the price point that exists between guaranteed ROI and a heatbrick for winter, since it is pretty obvious only the vendors (and resellers) are banking on hardware, with a handful of day-1 success stories and the rest of everyone disappointed because the old adage that buying BTC is more worthwhile is holding true.

Seriously, because I can't find one, can anyone realistically point me towards anyone selling hardware that will at least pay for itself, even removing exchange rates and going purely on a BTC-for-BTC basis?  Because I don't see that - anywhere.

People can stick to their altruism, good of the network, believe in Bitcoin mantras until they are blue in the face - nothing in the mining part of BitCoin looks like anything more than a bunch of greedy kids who keep getting burned and then back in bed with the same one liners and pre-order promises.  I'm all for BTC expanding, but much like I object to country clubs I see no valid reason to pay into a system where my effort to "support the network" is leading towards someone with newer hardware making cash at my expense.  Better to buy and spend BTC at businesses, which in the end will do a ton more for the cause than buying another piece of hardware, lining the pockets of vendors who look like a group of one hit wonders who will walk away from BTC with a pile of cash and no regrets.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
October 28, 2013, 11:58:45 AM
#54
Surprise!  It actually requires skill, commitment and dedication to create a new product and bring it to market.

Yeah I guess you figured that out by not having any.  

What happened to all your predictions about KnC never shipping on time?

Huh, Avalon, really?  Last I checked, they had imploded.  Bitfury shows out of stock on all products.  ASICminer was order and wait last time I looked, but perhaps that's changed, I don't keep up with them much.  Please provide links otherwise?

Their reputation was damaged by delaying their chips for a few months, far shorter then your delays, and they offered full BTC refunds to people how had their orders delayed, and are now shipping units built from those chips. They're also shipping units from inventory, not pre-orders.

I'm not going to bother linking because you're a delusional idiot, and there's no reason to bother trying to prove anything to you because who cares what you think?  You're just a joke to laugh at.

Oh, btw thanks for failing so hard. I never ordered from you, and  I made soo much more money with my B2 Avalon thanks to your perpetual fail fest!

___
Anyway, there are some new vendors out there.  Bitmine.ch, blackarrow are taking pre-orders (Not sure if they succeeded in getting enough funding).

BTCGarden currently has hardware, but their mainly marketing it in China, I think.

jr. member
Activity: 36
Merit: 1
October 28, 2013, 11:56:01 AM
#53
Whichever one of you guys can get some competitive equipment out there will be the first ones to get my money.  These BitFury options coming out as of late for $800-$1200 just to get started are frankly way out of line. 

I will wait until November, December, January, whatever it takes until the first company that comes along and offers something in a realistic price for what you are getting.  Do I expect it to ROI?  Not necessarily, but it should make up most of the cost of the unit at the very least.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
October 28, 2013, 09:32:46 AM
#52
So in summary it seems worthless to try having A CONVERSATION on this forum because people are here for the bitch-fest, not the decent content and engaging conversations.

Use that "ignore" button, and you'll have a much more pleasant experience here. Start with Inaba.

I contributed to the conversation. My concern is with Inaba slandering me and others.

And reactor back on Ignore.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
I run Linux on my abacus.
October 28, 2013, 07:43:55 AM
#51
So in summary it seems worthless to try having A CONVERSATION on this forum because people are here for the bitch-fest, not the decent content and engaging conversations.

Use that "ignore" button, and you'll have a much more pleasant experience here. Start with Inaba.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
October 28, 2013, 06:53:48 AM
#50
So in summary it seems worthless to try having A CONVERSATION on this forum because people are here for the bitch-fest, not the decent content and engaging conversations.

To group respond -

It's lame to hijack another thread for selling your stuff.  Period.  Especially when that hashrate will likely never return the $123 invested, so, again, better spent on holding BTC because you can still back out of that at any point.  Or better, I'll take your $123 and return you $110, and that is a more optimistic return than 8-10GH will give.

It's sad that vendors have to bicker, especially when neither is delivering something that will earn back the price they are charging/charged at the time of sale vs. expected delivery date.

Don't tell me I have to go to /r/Bitcoin to find intelligent conversation.
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
October 27, 2013, 11:54:53 PM
#49
(Look at Bicknellski's failed ventures)


Failed?

Redfury / Bluefury shipped in quantity within weeks of the finalized design and both runs sold out.

Avalon K1 USB people "pre-ordered" were paid back proactively and which you are STILL lying about in the trust ratings about me, given that the chips never arrived sort of like the Monarch tape out... failure on the chip manufacturers part. See Terrahash for failure to deliver and failure to fully refund.

As for our new venture the A1 Wasp we suspect we will have something on the market well before the Monarch even has a chip taped out. Our group is also considering a ColdFury version of the Bitfury USB if the prices for chips are reasonable and can provide the community with units in a few weeks time.

Failure is a relative term. I have yet to be a part of a team that has failed to REFUND people their BTC in a timely manner. We made a conscious decision not to continue holding money and refunded people given the delays well outside our control and rather than continuing to fail to refund people illegally for months (in some cases) as BFL has done, we did the right thing we gave refunds.

There is a huge ETHICAL divide between what you do at BFL and for BFL and what I have done and will do moving forward for our group. Where I respect and value the people that put their trust in me and the groups I work with further when I promise to deliver and then I know I can't deliver I return their money no questions asked unlike you and BFL. The FAILURE here is that BFL is direct violation to US laws and is not refunding customers.

So... to recap.

The groups I have worked with pulled the plug on a 11,000 USB K1 Nano unit run knowing full well that Avalon couldn't deliver the chips and we refunded everyone immediately.
The groups I have worked with have put out thousands of USB Bitfury mining units with little or no complaints, with reasonable delivery windows.
The group I am currently working with will have a unit for sale (open source hardware) that will be out WELL before the Monarch ever arrives.

Unlike your second gen ASIC vaporware chips for the Monarch which are already 2 months behind on your imaginary tape out schedule we are working with real chips and or chip fabricators that have actual people in house doing the ASIC design who can deliver on time or provide a refund / compensation for late delivery.

So ya I am a failure. I failed to keep people's BTC and I failed to force them to take extraordinary steps to recoup their BTC. I will continue to fail in this way because I am ethical and tend to work with ethical people. Your attempt to slander my reputation is well documented and I am not the only person that you have done this to.

Why not tell us why you were a defendant in Directv Inc v. Puccinelli et al.? http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-ksd-2_03-cv-02287/content-detail.html

Why were you enjoined from violating 47 USC 605(a)?


http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/47/605

Quote
(a) Practices prohibited
Except as authorized by chapter 119, title 18, no person receiving, assisting in receiving, transmitting, or assisting in transmitting, any interstate or foreign communication by wire or radio shall divulge or publish the existence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning thereof, except through authorized channels of transmission or reception,
(1) to any person other than the addressee, his agent, or attorney,
(2) to a person employed or authorized to forward such communication to its destination,
(3) to proper accounting or distributing officers of the various communicating centers over which the communication may be passed,
(4) to the master of a ship under whom he is serving,
(5) in response to a subpena issued by a court of competent jurisdiction, or
(6) on demand of other lawful authority. No person not being authorized by the sender shall intercept any radio communication and divulge or publish the existence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of such intercepted communication to any person. No person not being entitled thereto shall receive or assist in receiving any interstate or foreign communication by radio and use such communication (or any information therein contained) for his own benefit or for the benefit of another not entitled thereto. No person having received any intercepted radio communication or having become acquainted with the contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of such communication (or any part thereof) knowing that such communication was intercepted, shall divulge or publish the existence, contents, substance, purport, effect, or meaning of such communication (or any part thereof) or use such communication (or any information therein contained) for his own benefit or for the benefit of another not entitled thereto. This section shall not apply to the receiving, divulging, publishing, or utilizing the contents of any radio communication which is transmitted by any station for the use of the general public, which relates to ships, aircraft, vehicles, or persons in distress, or which is transmitted by an amateur radio station operator or by a citizens band radio operator.



-------------

Sorry needed to fix the record after Inaba 1 day later post edit.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
October 26, 2013, 04:17:07 PM
#48

ok so you got this gb for arrows.. 100 shares @ $123 each for 20 boards..

say I buy 20 shares.. that's equivalent to 4 boards.. I can have the 4 boards just sent to me and absolve the GB of any liability etc for my shares?

Sorry, it doesn't work that way. I'm a Group Buy Coordinator (you know: just a vetted miner that has the organizer gene) and not a vendor. It just so happens that this method offers a non-traditional method of fractional ownership at lower risks to a completely non-traditional Custom Hardware product. I don't think any other GBC that also offers hosting offers this particular method of sales either.

I built this co-op so that I *could* get these kinds of deals for other miners and for myself. It allows me (and others) to hedge and spread Custom Hardware bets (besides BTC buy/hold) at wholesale or at-cost deals.

It's priced this way because you're also getting hosting from bobsag3. His hosting fees helps make up the difference for these miners to be sold at this low cost and was part of his decision process in considering whether to offer our co-op this pricing.

Besides: How am I supposed to make my massive 0.25-0.37% commission on BTC mined if I did it this way?   Cheesy [For those wondering: that's my only "profit" from my co-op efforts, besides BTC earned by my own shares in most of our Rounds.]

==

BTW, I'd like to add that bitterdog is the reason why my GB Escrow Coordinator Services has the "Coordinator" Title as opposed to "Agent" title. He probably kept me out of a heap of legal troubles and a mountain of paperwork.

I tried to tip him but he adamantly refused. He's a good guy, IMHO.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 503
dApps Development Automation Platform
October 26, 2013, 04:08:49 PM
#47
I believe that I mentioned that these Black Arrow Bullet Run boards were available for sale outside the co-op, but I wasn't involved with that. If someone wants to run the miners themselves they can buy them outright at higher prices.

As a co-op with greater numbers/buying power we get access to Institutional Pricing & Exclusives outside the range of normal deals. We even get approached for at-cost and below-cost miner buyout offers from members, which has happened in 3 rounds. It's just a fact of the world that buying concerns with more purchasing power always get better deals. However, deals like these don't normally just fall in our lap, I'm actively always looking for the best deals for miners out there.

I think this is the perfect place to mention this GB as it's the least expensive/best value access to custom hardware that will be "on the shelf" in Missouri by Wed/Thursday, which is what we miners have been complaining about for so long. This isn't the first time a GB has bled over to the CH forum as they're often interrelated and you sometimes see GBs or GB-type listings posted outright by others on this CH forum.

Here's a couple examples of entire threads that probably belonged in the GB forum alongside Canary, SSB, and company: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-bifury-5-ghs-usb-miner-in-stock-sale-309918
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bpmc-launch-bf1-usb-miner-probably-the-fastest-usb-miner-in-the-world-292433

If someone wants to buy boards elsewhere and run them themselves, they also have that option.

Options are good! Our co-op option is the no muss/no fuss option at smaller price points then manufacturers can typically offer customers, which is why we've also gotten support from various mfgs. that we work with.

ok so you got this gb for arrows.. 100 shares @ $123 each for 20 boards..

say I buy 20 shares.. that's equivalent to 4 boards.. I can have the 4 boards just sent to me and absolve the GB of any liability etc for my shares?
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
October 26, 2013, 03:30:43 PM
#46
I believe that I mentioned that these Black Arrow Bullet Run boards were available for sale outside the co-op, but I wasn't involved with that. If someone wants to run the miners themselves they can buy them outright at higher prices.

As a co-op with greater numbers/buying power we get access to Institutional Pricing & Exclusives outside the range of normal deals. We even get approached for at-cost and below-cost miner buyout offers from members, which has happened in 3 rounds. It's just a fact of the world that buying concerns with more purchasing power always get better deals. However, deals like these don't normally just fall in our lap, I'm actively always looking for the best deals for miners out there.

I think this is the perfect place to mention this GB as it's the least expensive/best value access to custom hardware that will be "on the shelf" in Missouri by Wed/Thursday, which is what we miners have been complaining about for so long. This isn't the first time a GB has bled over to the CH forum as they're often interrelated and you sometimes see GBs or GB-type listings posted outright by others on this CH forum.

Here's a couple examples of entire threads that probably belonged in the GB forum alongside Canary, SSB, and company: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/ann-bifury-5-ghs-usb-miner-in-stock-sale-309918
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bpmc-launch-bf1-usb-miner-probably-the-fastest-usb-miner-in-the-world-292433

If someone wants to buy boards elsewhere and run them themselves, they also have that option.

Options are good! Our co-op option is the no muss/no fuss option at smaller price points then manufacturers can typically offer customers, which is why we've also gotten support from various mfgs. that we work with.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 503
dApps Development Automation Platform
October 26, 2013, 03:18:46 PM
#45
For those looking to buy hardware off the shelf, Black Arrow was contracted to do a Bullet Run by bobsag3 and a custom hardware mfg. that sells his miners on the GB forum. bobsag3 is the exclusive official US Reseller for Black Arrow and has put a lot of money down to get hardware in miners hands sooner rather than later.

I was offered exclusive pricing on this by bobsag3, a DZ MC co-op member/leader/admin/vetted miner host and GB Coordinator.

BA is guaranteeing shipping by November 1 or we get our money back.
Thomas S. and I are holding onto the GB funds to make sure that refund funds are available, if necessary. In fact, we have an update from the factory that they expect to be shipping tomorrow night and bobsag3 expects delivery in Missouri by Wednesday/Thursday. If they fail to meet this Nov. 1 deadline we all get refunds but get to keep the hashrate.  Smiley  Smiley

These boards will be considered to be on the shelf and available for immediate sale/shipping by Wednesday/Thursday. I should have some more recent pictures to share on this shortly.

===

I'm offering fractional ownership of these boards to be hosted at a pro colo facility by bobsag3. There is also a sales outlet if you just wanted to buy boards outright, but I'm not involved with that deal.

I'm just the GB Coordinator for this deal and I'm truly hardware neutral as a longtime IT vet (except for BFL/Avalon; they're permabanned from our co-op). I'm not officially affiliated with BA, but they have stopped by to confirm that they're working with bobsag3.

To summarize: 15TH/s Black Arrow Bullet Run with Bitfury chips now instead of BA Minion chips in February.

$123 = 8.34 - 10GH/s + 1 month free hosting in Missouri + World's Lowest Hosting/Management fees at 2.75% every 2 weeks + UPS / Gas Generator backup protection + 3 remote admins + 1 local admin (all IT pros, including 2 Network Engineers and an EE) + custom built cabinet with extra Air Conditioner just for our co-op. This facility was designed by bosag3 and myself, a pro network engineer who's designed 4 different Research Lab server rooms.

Miners guaranteed to be shipping by November 1 or your money/BTC back.

Please see the 11th GB link in my sig for more details.

MOST people are not interested in SHARING the cost of a single miner. If bob is willing to sell them to individuals as a single sale then by all means open the flood gates lets get them sold... otherwise this thread wasn't really the place for you to promote your group buy/hosted venture - To promote Bob selling black arrows - yes.. your GB - No

Bob if you want to sell some of the bullet runs pm me... otherwise they are just all reserved for this group buy thing and that's shame on black arrow for allowing the ONLY reseller to lock them up and not get them out to as many people as possible. Word of mouth goes far for reputation and future sales
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
October 26, 2013, 03:08:09 PM
#44
Im more than happy to answer any questions or concerns, as is zombie. We try not to have too much of a life outside the forums Smiley
One quick question, is the $123/share price tied to the exchange rate or fixed? I guess I probably should post this in an appropriate thread but oh well O:)

The share price is fixed as far as USD but volatile as far as BTC. This helps protect our GBs from BTC's day to day volatility (when miners are priced in USD) and also allows people to time any BTC buys to their best advantage. The exchange rate we use is Bitstamp, as every mfg. we've ordered from so far has used this rate.

Here's the Round 11 payment post: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.3384287
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
October 26, 2013, 03:07:50 PM
#43
from my research it appears the main issue is that to develop a board based on someone else's chips is usually an expensive venture unless you source it to china or north europe, and even then the asic manufactureres charge too much for thier chips on a reel.

for example lets take a bitfury 16-chip board:

PCB prototype cost (3-10 boards): ~$60-200 per board with varying timeframes
parts (not including bitfury chips): ~$15-30 per board depending if you want to upgrade components for better overclocking
assembly (in north america): ~$80-$200 per board depending how many and where you go. generally there is a first-time fee of >$200

total cost per board for small-run batch : $200-$350 approx
total cost per board for batch of 200 boards : $50-$100 approx
CHIP COST: currently the lowest ive seen is around $15 if ordering a reel. for 16-chip board : $240

this means that even with large production batches, we would be limited by what the chip designer wants for a reel. In the above example, a medium-sized run of boards and assembly would not be much less than direct purchase from MBP/BFSB (especially if they drop pricing to $350-$400 soon like i think they should)

Even with the promise of $5 chips in janruary, you would see costs of around $150 per board and it would be minimally cheaper then what they would likely charge at the time. The only way to step ahead of the curve is to design your own chips or have an open-source design.

*open-source cant be difficult, since most designs are based on FPGA code, right? I would imagine it cant be difficult to make chips for $1 a peice that are a basic design (exactly what avalon and asicminer did IMO)*
hero member
Activity: 491
Merit: 514
October 26, 2013, 02:57:15 PM
#42
Im more than happy to answer any questions or concerns, as is zombie. We try not to have too much of a life outside the forums Smiley
One quick question, is the $123/share price tied to the exchange rate or fixed? I guess I probably should post this in an appropriate thread but oh well O:)
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
Owner, Minersource.net
October 26, 2013, 02:49:09 PM
#41
I was just replying to the question.

He was looking for a new Custom Hardware vendor, and we have one in our midst: a miner just like us that put his money where his mouth is and paid to get 15TH/s made to be delivered sooner, rather than later.

These are always at-cost or even below-cost deals I structure for GBs. I don't make a single satoshi from immediate GB share sales as the extra funds go into UPS protection and co-op facility improvements. I'm trying to pool buying power so us little guys can get Institutional Pricing and exclusive deals like this.

I was once scammed by ASX Project (see the #4 sidebar FAQ at: http://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoinmining ) and I fell for BFL's BS when I was a noob. I'm here to help others have better experiences than I did when I started.

For me: personally, I eventually receive 0.25-0.37% of the 2.75% hosting/management fees once the miners arrive and are running, for coordinating all this and running the co-op. I would definitely say that is a very modest fee for the value of my work. I actually have no skin in these particular Rounds myself as far as shares but that's just because I have so many pre-orders in already, all over the place.
Yeah and I was asking a genuine question Cheesy. I'm looking for the catch and can't find one which of course most people would find alarming. I'm not saying "true believers" don't exist but they are very rare and the number #1 choice of clothing for wolves Tongue.

Because I have more than enough for myself to make a tidy profit, and I still make money on having all the boards hosted with me. Just because I am not as greedy as others does not mean I am doing this at a loss Smiley
This just raises my alarm but I think I will look into this more and maybe throw a few BTC in to see how it pans out since you guys have been pretty tenacious in defending any accusations or concerns...
Im more than happy to answer any questions or concerns, as is zombie. We try not to have too much of a life outside the forums Smiley
hero member
Activity: 491
Merit: 514
October 26, 2013, 02:40:57 PM
#40
I was just replying to the question.

He was looking for a new Custom Hardware vendor, and we have one in our midst: a miner just like us that put his money where his mouth is and paid to get 15TH/s made to be delivered sooner, rather than later.

These are always at-cost or even below-cost deals I structure for GBs. I don't make a single satoshi from immediate GB share sales as the extra funds go into UPS protection and co-op facility improvements. I'm trying to pool buying power so us little guys can get Institutional Pricing and exclusive deals like this.

I was once scammed by ASX Project (see the #4 sidebar FAQ at: http://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoinmining ) and I fell for BFL's BS when I was a noob. I'm here to help others have better experiences than I did when I started.

For me: personally, I eventually receive 0.25-0.37% of the 2.75% hosting/management fees once the miners arrive and are running, for coordinating all this and running the co-op. I would definitely say that is a very modest fee for the value of my work. I actually have no skin in these particular Rounds myself as far as shares but that's just because I have so many pre-orders in already, all over the place.
Yeah and I was asking a genuine question Cheesy. I'm looking for the catch and can't find one which of course most people would find alarming. I'm not saying "true believers" don't exist but they are very rare and the number #1 choice of clothing for wolves Tongue.

Because I have more than enough for myself to make a tidy profit, and I still make money on having all the boards hosted with me. Just because I am not as greedy as others does not mean I am doing this at a loss Smiley
This just raises my alarm but I think I will look into this more and maybe throw a few BTC in to see how it pans out since you guys have been pretty tenacious in defending any accusations or concerns...
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
October 26, 2013, 02:11:49 PM
#39
I was just replying to the question.

He was looking for a new Custom Hardware vendor, and we have one in our midst: a miner just like us that put his money where his mouth is and paid to get 15TH/s made to be delivered sooner, rather than later.

These are always at-cost or even below-cost deals I structure for GBs. I don't make a single satoshi from immediate GB share sales as the extra funds go into UPS protection and co-op facility improvements. I'm trying to pool buying power so us little guys can get Institutional Pricing and exclusive deals like this.

I was once scammed by ASX Project (see the #4 sidebar FAQ at: http://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoinmining ) and I fell for BFL's BS when I was a noob. I'm here to help others have better experiences than I did when I started.

For me: personally, I eventually receive 0.25-0.37% of the 2.75% hosting/management fees once the miners arrive and are running, for coordinating all this and running the co-op. I would definitely say that is a very modest fee for the value of my work. I actually have no skin in these particular Rounds myself as far as shares but that's just because I have so many pre-orders in already, all over the place.
hero member
Activity: 546
Merit: 500
Owner, Minersource.net
October 26, 2013, 02:07:57 PM
#38
For those looking to buy hardware off the shelf, Black Arrow was contracted to do a Bullet Run by bobsag3 and a custom hardware mfg. that sells his miners on the GB forum. bobsag3 is the exclusive official US Reseller for Black Arrow and has put a lot of money down to get hardware in miners hands sooner rather than later.

I was offered exclusive pricing on this by bobsag3, a DZ MC co-op member/leader/admin/vetted miner host and GB Coordinator.

BA is guaranteeing shipping by November 1 or we get our money back.
Thomas S. and I are holding onto the GB funds to make sure that refund funds are available, if necessary. In fact, we have an update from the factory that they expect to be shipping tomorrow night and bobsag3 expects delivery in Missouri by Wednesday/Thursday. If they fail to meet this Nov. 1 deadline we all get refunds but get to keep the hashrate.  Smiley  Smiley

These boards will be considered to be on the shelf and available for immediate sale/shipping by Wednesday/Thursday. I should have some more recent pictures to share on this shortly.

===

I'm offering fractional ownership of these boards to be hosted at a pro colo facility by bobsag3. I'm just the GB Coordinator and I'm truly hardware neutral as a longtime IT vet (except for BFL/Avalon; they're permabanned from our co-op). I'm not officially affiliated with BA, but they have stopped by to confirm that they're working with bobsag3.

To summarize: 15TH/s Black Arrow Bullet Run with Bitfury chips now instead of BA Minion chips in February.

$123 = 8.34 - 10GH/s + 1 month free hosting in Missouri + World's Lowest Hosting/Management fees at 2.75% every 2 weeks + UPS / Gas Generator backup protection + 3 remote admins + 1 local admin (all IT pros, including 2 Network Engineers and an EE) + custom built cabinet with extra Air Conditioner just for our co-op. This facility was designed by bosag3 and myself, a pro network engineer who's designed 4 different Research Lab server rooms.

Miners guaranteed to be shipping by November 1 or your money/BTC back.

Please see the 11th GB link in my sig for more details.

I keep seeing this spammed everywhere and have one question that keeps me from participating. Why would you sell these if they are profitable?
Because I have more than enough for myself to make a tidy profit, and I still make money on having all the boards hosted with me. Just because I am not as greedy as others does not mean I am doing this at a loss Smiley
hero member
Activity: 491
Merit: 514
October 26, 2013, 02:03:32 PM
#37
For those looking to buy hardware off the shelf, Black Arrow was contracted to do a Bullet Run by bobsag3 and a custom hardware mfg. that sells his miners on the GB forum. bobsag3 is the exclusive official US Reseller for Black Arrow and has put a lot of money down to get hardware in miners hands sooner rather than later.

I was offered exclusive pricing on this by bobsag3, a DZ MC co-op member/leader/admin/vetted miner host and GB Coordinator.

BA is guaranteeing shipping by November 1 or we get our money back.
Thomas S. and I are holding onto the GB funds to make sure that refund funds are available, if necessary. In fact, we have an update from the factory that they expect to be shipping tomorrow night and bobsag3 expects delivery in Missouri by Wednesday/Thursday. If they fail to meet this Nov. 1 deadline we all get refunds but get to keep the hashrate.  Smiley  Smiley

These boards will be considered to be on the shelf and available for immediate sale/shipping by Wednesday/Thursday. I should have some more recent pictures to share on this shortly.

===

I'm offering fractional ownership of these boards to be hosted at a pro colo facility by bobsag3. I'm just the GB Coordinator and I'm truly hardware neutral as a longtime IT vet (except for BFL/Avalon; they're permabanned from our co-op). I'm not officially affiliated with BA, but they have stopped by to confirm that they're working with bobsag3.

To summarize: 15TH/s Black Arrow Bullet Run with Bitfury chips now instead of BA Minion chips in February.

$123 = 8.34 - 10GH/s + 1 month free hosting in Missouri + World's Lowest Hosting/Management fees at 2.75% every 2 weeks + UPS / Gas Generator backup protection + 3 remote admins + 1 local admin (all IT pros, including 2 Network Engineers and an EE) + custom built cabinet with extra Air Conditioner just for our co-op. This facility was designed by bosag3 and myself, a pro network engineer who's designed 4 different Research Lab server rooms.

Miners guaranteed to be shipping by November 1 or your money/BTC back.

Please see the 11th GB link in my sig for more details.

I keep seeing this spammed everywhere and have one question that keeps me from participating. Why would you sell these if they are profitable?
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
October 26, 2013, 01:58:18 PM
#36
For those looking to buy hardware off the shelf, Black Arrow was contracted to do a Bullet Run by bobsag3 and a custom hardware mfg. that sells his miners on the GB forum. bobsag3 is the exclusive official US Reseller for Black Arrow and has put a lot of money down to get hardware in miners hands sooner rather than later.

I was offered exclusive pricing on this by bobsag3, a DZ MC co-op member/leader/admin/vetted miner host and GB Coordinator.

BA is guaranteeing shipping by November 1 or we get our money back.
Thomas S. and I are holding onto the GB funds to make sure that refund funds are available, if necessary. In fact, we have an update from the factory that they expect to be shipping tomorrow night and bobsag3 expects delivery in Missouri by Wednesday/Thursday. If they fail to meet this Nov. 1 deadline we all get refunds but get to keep the hashrate.  Smiley  Smiley

These boards will be considered to be on the shelf and available for immediate sale/shipping by Wednesday/Thursday. I should have some more recent pictures to share on this shortly.

===

I'm offering fractional ownership of these boards to be hosted at a pro colo facility by bobsag3. There is also a sales outlet if you just wanted to buy boards outright, but I'm not involved with that deal.

I'm just the GB Coordinator for this deal and I'm truly hardware neutral as a longtime IT vet (except for BFL/Avalon; they're permabanned from our co-op). I'm not officially affiliated with BA, but they have stopped by to confirm that they're working with bobsag3.

To summarize: 15TH/s Black Arrow Bullet Run with Bitfury chips now instead of BA Minion chips in February.

$123 = 8.34 - 10GH/s + 1 month free hosting in Missouri + World's Lowest Hosting/Management fees at 2.75% every 2 weeks + UPS / Gas Generator backup protection + 3 remote admins + 1 local admin (all IT pros, including 2 Network Engineers and an EE) + custom built cabinet with extra Air Conditioner just for our co-op. This facility was designed by bosag3 and myself, a pro network engineer who's designed 4 different Research Lab server rooms.

Miners guaranteed to be shipping by November 1 or your money/BTC back.

Please see the 11th GB link in my sig for more details.
hero member
Activity: 491
Merit: 514
October 26, 2013, 01:57:10 PM
#35
Well schooled, Tehfiend. Excellent point by point refutation and good real world examples.

Expect to be labelled a troll by the boy in a bubble.

I would expect no less and assume he will find a few minor errors in my statements that he will use to post more FUD to confuse the basic facts which show without a doubt that BFL has purposely misled their customers almost from day 1 and continue to do so.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Updated ironic image.
October 26, 2013, 01:41:02 PM
#34
Well schooled, Tehfiend. Excellent point by point refutation and good real world examples.

Expect to be labelled a troll by the boy in a bubble.
hero member
Activity: 491
Merit: 514
October 26, 2013, 01:25:55 PM
#33
People are finding out it's not as easy to create a brand new product as they would have you believe, that's what's happening.  Even the people using others IP can't bring products to market (Look at Bicknellski's failed ventures) with all of the parts already laid out for them, much less create anything from scratch.

Surprise!  It actually requires skill, commitment and dedication to create a new product and bring it to market.
It's definitely a lot easier than you have made it look as KNC brought a 28nm ASIC miner to market in a little over 4 months.

Oh really?  As one of the few shipping ASIC vendors, I think that makes me qualified to speak on the subject, unlike you.  What have you done to bring a new product to the market from scratch?  Oh that's right... nothing at all.
Yes you are right, you are living proof of the risks people face when making pre-orders as the VAST majority of your customers experienced insane delays and extremely negative ROI if they managed to receive their product. We can now say "be careful you don't get BFL'ed when pre-ordering" and pretty much everybody will know exactly what that means.

Can you point to a vendor that's doing number 3 now?  Are you seriously complaining that because demand is exceeding supply, it is somehow the vendors fault?

As for 4, I have no idea what you are talking about. BFL doesn't have any 110nm products and again, are you seriously complaining about the fact that people are paying money for a given product and the vendor charges what people will pay... but it's "overpriced" even though people are paying it?  If it was overpriced, people wouldn't buy it - that is simple economics.  If you think it's over priced, don't buy it.  The majority of the market disagrees with you, so that makes you the one that is incorrect.  

So basically points 3 and 4 are invalid and you have proven my point.
Yes actually it is the vendors vault when they sell more pre-orders than they could possibly ever ship in their advertised time-frame such as BFL has done. Both Bitsyncom and KNC (and most others really) sold limited numbers in their batches unlike BFL who pretty much took money from anybody willing to get in their line with no idea that your advertised shipping times were complete lies which would slip time and time and time and time and time again.

Huh, Avalon, really?  Last I checked, they had imploded.
Check again. A few weeks ago I purchased 3 Avalon mini's that shipped in less than 72 hours after I ordered them. They are due to ship their gen2 hardware OFF THE SHELF any time now...

There are no orders being shipped that were ordered a year ago, please stop spreading false information.  Our failure rate on hardware is less than 1%, much better than industry average, so again, your argument is invalid.  

Sorry, but if you consider 400 - 1000+ units shipped per day in this industry to be "few devices" you need to have your head examined.
Josh everybody knows you're smart enough to understand that in "this industry", volume means nothing and hashrate means everything. It's like comparing the number of 300MH block eruptors with the number of 500GH Jupiters that have shipped. By repeating this over and over it is only revealing the deception you are constantly hiding behind.

The fact is BFL has been a disaster. Sure not a COMPLETE disaster like bASIC but still a disaster. While waiting for my 60GH Feb BFL pre-order to arrive:
- I've pre-ordered Avalon batch #2 units in Feb which arrived in JUNE for a total of 190GH
- I've pre-ordered raw Avalon chips from Zephir in April which arrived in July, had them sent to Germany where Burnin used a custom board to ship me functioning BitBurner miners in August all from scratch!
- I pre-ordered from a BRAND NEW company KNC back in June which shipped a 525GH miner to me THREE WEEKS AGO!
- I've ordered 3 Avalon Mini's on Oct 15th which shipped within 72 hours which had three times the hashrate for less than my BFL pre-order cost which has still not shipped


What has BFL been doing during these 8+ months since others have produced miners FROM SCRATCH in much less time? It's 100% obvious that BFL sold MANY MANY MANY more orders than they could possible ever ship and all of the lies that have been spewed by you during this past year amount to fraud in my opinion.

/school
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012
Beyond Imagination
October 26, 2013, 08:05:23 AM
#32
I think Avalon is working on something big

YiFuck's ego chi, maybe?

Anyway, I'm having the same thoughts that the next few months will decide which ASIC companies will be left standing. The race to the bottom has already started and soon we'll see how low $/GH will go.

Maybe we won't see so much "next gen" ASICs but just more energy-efficient respins of older designs. There seems to be a sweet spot between the 130-110 nm and 20-28 nm designs that is efficient enough, and cheap enough to make... just stick more of the chips on the same PCB, and they might still be cheaper to churn out en masse than the ones made with 20-28 nm process.

The next half year should prove to be interesting.

Actually the chip design is not a very difficult task and soon there will even be open sourced chip design. So you can anticipate many cheap Chinese made miners showing up in the coming months

The manufacturing node currently is not a big concern, since the mining rig's cost and delivery time is the main factor. 4 Avalons delivered today are much more useful than a knc saturn delivered one month later, and the earning difference is more than enough to pay for months of electricity cost
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
I run Linux on my abacus.
October 26, 2013, 07:27:35 AM
#31
I think Avalon is working on something big

YiFuck's ego chi, maybe?

Anyway, I'm having the same thoughts that the next few months will decide which ASIC companies will be left standing. The race to the bottom has already started and soon we'll see how low $/GH will go.

Maybe we won't see so much "next gen" ASICs but just more energy-efficient respins of older designs. There seems to be a sweet spot between the 130-110 nm and 20-28 nm designs that is efficient enough, and cheap enough to make... just stick more of the chips on the same PCB, and they might still be cheaper to churn out en masse than the ones made with 20-28 nm process.

The next half year should prove to be interesting.
legendary
Activity: 1988
Merit: 1012
Beyond Imagination
October 26, 2013, 06:02:59 AM
#30
Difficulty just jumped 46% up, few hardware vendor can chart the market with such fast diminishing return, unless they have already ROIed. I think Avalon is working on something big
hero member
Activity: 924
Merit: 1000
October 26, 2013, 05:01:42 AM
#29
People are finding out it's not as easy to create a brand new product as they would have you believe, that's what's happening.

Some even drag it out unnecessarily long and refuse to give refunds. Amazing right? (Need to get my dig in the guy deserves it)


When you ask where are the new Custom Hardware vendors... do you mean chips and rigs or would those producing units with others chips count?

I think there a plenty of people keen on developing "new" systems but given that the cost of developing a chip is pretty substantial and time consuming has probably put a huge damper on newer vendors because of difficulty rising sharply and the actual demand for miners will taper off if it hasn't already. What doesn't help are companies like BFL and Avalon that have pretty much soured the market and thrown up huge hurdles even for the most well intentioned company but I would say the economics are not there. Look at Black Arrow and their chip rig combo "pre-selling" at the lowest rate $/gh but given their time to market it will likely not be oversold like an Avalon or BFL offering because their really is no guarantees now to earn back your investment.

To be honest there are quite a few people at the margins as well looking to revive the DIY push that BKKCoins, Alten, Burnin all started with their DIY Avalons unfortunately Avalon failed to deliver and that I think has left many questioning the trust of chip fabricators. I suspect that DIY will push through and continue developing units even with exponential difficulty some people are keen on this as a hobby, even though it is an expensive hobby. There are plenty of people willing to keep even pushing the Avalon Gen I Klondikes just get those boards going. If you are looking for newer vendors I don't see where simply designing ASICs is going to be profitable for anyone for the foreseeable future. I suspect several companies will collapse and fail to produce a second or third generation of miner at this stage. Some of these companies really should disappear as they are literally dragging the marketplace down with their ineffectual shipping and refusal to follow fair and reasonable trade practices. With them gone it might put some needed trust back in the community and free up space for better companies in the future.

I would ask you what is wrong with KnC, HashFast, Cointerra, and Black Arrow? Are they not new enough? Different in their offerings? Better at customer services and shipping on time in the case of KnC, are they not?
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Updated ironic image.
October 25, 2013, 07:00:38 PM
#28
Um... yeah.  So this turned into a bit of a hate-fest.  Serious replies still appreciated, curious why the vendor pool, if mining is such a good investment, has basically dried up after early next year?

Sorry for the derailment.

Without either a rise in the exchange rate or the sudden mass adoption of reasonable transaction fees or an increase in the volume of transactions (with fees), mining isn't a good investment. The spring/summer rush of preorders was based on a lack of awareness of how much hashrate had been bought by everyone else and hearing good news stories from the lucky early Avalon miners. Now the reality has hit home, I doubt KNC, Hashfast, Cointerra, Bitfury and the dreaded BFL are getting many new orders today. I guess the delay between the preorder date and the delivery date of most of these devices means the feedback loop informing people with spare cash that this a sensible investment was too long and thus, people have made irrational and unsound decisions.

Why aren't there more vendors? Perhaps the people with the correct skills and experience are getting paid more working for Intel, AMD, ARM, Samsung or Apple and don't feel that attracted to working in this kind of insane environment.

Philosophically, I don't really see any real advantage to the mining difficulty getting any higher. Back in the CPU days, more people mined and therefore the market was more accessible and the network more distributed and therefore safer. GPU and now ASIC mining reduces the pool size with no real advantage unless you have a larger share of the pie. I think this is where Litecoin has the better balance, but unfortunately it was derivative and second to the race.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1004
Glow Stick Dance!
October 25, 2013, 06:54:35 PM
#27
Um... yeah.  So this turned into a bit of a hate-fest.  Serious replies still appreciated, curious why the vendor pool, if mining is such a good investment, has basically dried up after early next year?

I'm really sorry I resurrected this thread.  I thought the OP had a very good question but it went ignored.  Now I really regret my decision, lol.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
October 25, 2013, 06:43:53 PM
#26
Um... yeah.  So this turned into a bit of a hate-fest.  Serious replies still appreciated, curious why the vendor pool, if mining is such a good investment, has basically dried up after early next year?
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Updated ironic image.
October 25, 2013, 06:37:43 PM
#25
This thread starting good....and BAM !

Trolls come back again with BFL rage  Roll Eyes

Come on...

What can I say, a monumental asshole visited this thread (and I don't mean me  Cheesy).

I don't regard myself as a troll; just a burnt out customer who visited a stupid forum (not this one) for a year hoping for some good news. It never happened. Now, I don't want any newcomer to this forum to get the distorted picture that MA tries to paint with his plays on words, refutations, denials and delusions of grandeur. What goes around comes around, when chickens come home to roost ....
hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
October 25, 2013, 06:24:50 PM
#24
This thread starting good....and BAM !

Trolls come back again with BFL rage  Roll Eyes

Come on...
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Updated ironic image.
October 25, 2013, 05:56:13 PM
#23
Quote
So for an update on shipping times... As you might imagine, we get this question a lot. It seems like it would be a simple question to answer, but it's not. Let me describe the process so people can better understand why.


If you look at the current FPGA board in a Single or MiniRig, you'll see lots of capacitors, resistors, etc... about 350 little tiny parts attached to the board. Contrary to some of the conspiracy theories out there, all our boards are completely custom made, they aren't purchased from another manufacturer, etc... they are designed by us and made for us and us alone. As such, we are required to volume source every single part that goes on the board.


The ASICs are similar in so far as they also have nearly 350 components on each board. With the FPGAs, we sourced parts in the hundreds or low thousands at a time. For some of the ASIC parts, we are sourcing hundreds of thousands at a time which requires direct ordering & lead time dependancy from the respective manufacturers. However, for this first batch, we're mostly able to depend on available distribution stock from places like Mouser and DigiKey. Shortly after we get the first batch of everything in, we'll have our larger mega stockpiles arrive from other vendors and/or direct from the distributors, it's just the first batch that's going to be rough.


So, we've got he myriad distributors shipping thousands of little pieces to us, the PCB manufacturer sending us the bare PCBs, the HSF manufacturer sending the HSFs to us, the PSU manufacturer sending the PSU's to us, the case manufacturer sending the cases to us and most importantly, the fab sending the ASIC chips to us. All of these must arrive on time and as expected for everything to go off without a hitch. So far, so good.


When we made our announcement for shipping dates, we padded in some extra weeks in case of delays, and as we try to herd all these cats into one corral, our padding is slowly eaten up with mostly minor problems, but they all add up. With the bump in specs, we spent some time ensuring the power subsystem is over powered to accommodate the new and future power requirements - our chips are capable of higher speeds than what we initially intended to send out in the first batch, and they still have quite a bit of headroom; We decided to go ahead design the power subsystem to handle the maximum theoretical load of the chips. This means we can now crank the board up with some minor tweaking. Each chip is theoretically capable of operating at 1 GHz, we are running them at 500 MHz with the new specs... we will likely never see 1 GHz operations, simply because of heat density issues and a few other factors, but we have at least another 25% of headroom we can play with, if not more. Again, we built in a lot of padding into the specs, just in case something went wrong. We have basically padded everything we could in terms of estimates and that padding is what has allowed us to bump specs on short notice and keep our shipping times in line even in the face of delays.


Ok, so we have the cats herded, the specs staked out, now we have to actually build these things. As many of you know, we've purchased SMT machines to allow us to manufacture our own boards - and I have mentioned this before, but many have not heard it - we will not be using the SMT equipment to process our first batch of boards; we will be using the same house that did the pick and place for our previous generation products, which means we're still at the mercy of someone else for our first batch shipments. There has been some delays at that stage, but we have the padding, so it's not been a critical issue. There has also been some delays at the foundry, but again, we have padding, so it's not been a critical issue. We are also paying for an expedited run at the foundry (which does not come cheap) to keep our timeline up. All these things have to work out perfectly and our timeline is still looking good. However, if something does not work out perfectly, our timeline is going to slip, plain and simple. We've used up most of our padding at this point and we are still ironing out a few little wrinkles here and there. This has been a long explanation for a simple answer: I would like to tell you we are still on time or pretty close to it, because we are. However, I would also like to tell you that we are going to slip a couple weeks or so if anything goes wrong, and given the complexity of the issues facing us, I would say it's almost inevitable something will crop up between now and the beginning of November that we are not expecting; What that is, I don't know yet, but I would rather error on the side of caution, say the timeline is going to slip a little bit and then surprise everyone with an early delivery than promise an early delivery and not meet that promise. So that's what I'm doing and there's your answer. When I have more information, I'll let people know as soon as I can.

https://forums.butterflylabs.com/pre-sales-questions/104-shipping-2-3-weeks-2.html#post1461

Historic fantasy bullshit from November 2012. Why did I believe this verbose crap? Why do you think long-suffering customers will ever order from you again? I wouldn't worry about the constituents of this forum, I'd be more worried about the people you've sold to. They aren't going to be coming back.

And please stop advertising here, if you don't get any orders from this forum. The fact that you spent 25 big fat coins on your last round makes me think it matters more than you'd care to admit. Go feed off your Adwords victims.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Updated ironic image.
October 25, 2013, 05:35:59 PM
#22
Endless, repetitious, unsubstantiated bullshit...

Straight question: why did you send me my November 2012 Single order in September 2013, a week after I received a Paypal refund for that item? Brandon admitted he knew it had been refunded and told me to reverse the refund. Just interested. Seems like a strange tactic for a trustworthy company.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
October 25, 2013, 05:25:58 PM
#21


There are no orders being shipped that were ordered a year ago, please stop spreading false information.  Our failure rate on hardware is less than 1%, much better than industry average, so again, your argument is invalid. 

Sorry, but if you consider 400 - 1000+ units shipped per day in this industry to be "few devices" you need to have your head examined.

For somebody who purports to ignore the prattle on bitcointalk you responded very quickly.  Please read carefully.  I said almost a year, not over 1 year.  If you're going to nitpick (which you do play semantics all the time) get it right.  My order was shipped with over a 1 year delay BTW.  I ordered in June 2012 and it shipped a few days short of 13 months.  Minirig owners did not see their full purchased hashing power for almost 14 months.

I doubt your failure rate is less than 1%.  Most computer hardware has rates exceeding that failure rate and admittedly no ASIC vendor would make such ridiculous claims.  I'm sure those ASICminer USB sticks are close to 2-3% and BFL is probably closer to 5% judging by what is said on the forums.  I can't fault the company or it's employees for having something break since we are human and the devices were assembled by human hands.  I can justly rail all I want for not getting a reply for 8 days for my RMA - the downtime cost me over 10BTC which is roughly $2k right now.  That is inexcusable.

I did choose to purchase from BFL willingly - it was my choice.  I choose to stick with the company and by the time I decided to ask for a refund your company redacted their refund offering.  I do like your product, but I have lost quite a bit of BTC (I paid in BTC) by buying it seeing as how I was suckered in believing the devices would ship sometime in October.....2012.   I believe you are currently the face of the company - if you can sleep with that at night...

I never said I ignore the prattle on Bitcointalk, where did you hear that?  I rather enjoy watching the abject stupidity that people come up with on here.  It's a recreational activity for me... when I'm busy or my attention is otherwise engaged, I don't bother much with this forum.  That said, again, you post false information.  Your order, if you ordered in June 2012 was scheduled to ship in November of 2012 at best.  Your device was never a year or even "almost a year" late.

You can doubt the failure rate is less than 1% all you want, it doesn't change reality.  "Judging by the forums" are you serious?  Do you think the majority of our orders are from these forums?  Hahaha you are more delusional than I thought.   Why do you think I don't take this forum seriously?  The people on here are a tiny fraction of our order base.  We've shipped more than 20k units and had far less than 200 come back for RMA (I think we are somewhere around ~100 - 125 units at last count).  Contrary to what you'd have other believe with your misinformation, our products are rock solid, unlike some other products out there. 

I sleep just fine at night (when I'm not on an airplane anyway).  BFL has and is delivering a quality product.  Our only fault at this point is the fact that we are delayed.  Yes, we missed our power targets and we offered full refunds because of that.  We also offered a free 50% hashrate bump.  Yes, it's a big fault, missing the shipping date and I have apologized for it numerous times.  There's a lot of things we would have done differently had we known what we know now.  But the simple fact of the matter is, we were the first into this space and because we had the most advanced technology, it cost us a lot of time dealing with the consequences of that.  In retrospect, it was not the way to go, but what's done is done and there you have it.  You can keep harping on the past, if it makes you feel better.  Don't order from us in the future if you don't like us or trust us, that's what I would do in your shoes if I was as bent out of shape as some of the people here.  Other than that, there's not much else to say.

legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
October 25, 2013, 04:31:25 PM
#20
Huh, Avalon, really?  Last I checked, they had imploded.

They've been selling by auction at https://tradehill.com/auctions.

 Bitfury shows out of stock on all products.

Available for Oct delivery at https://megabigpower.com/shop/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=53.


ASICminer was order and wait last time I looked, but perhaps that's changed, I don't keep up with them much.  Please provide links otherwise?

Readily available at https://www.btcguild.com//index.php?page=store and other resellers.

Sorry, but if you consider 400 - 1000+ units shipped per day in this industry to be "few devices" you need to have your head examined.

First it was 20,000 devices. How do you ship 400-1000 a day for 6 months and only ship 20k units?
hero member
Activity: 873
Merit: 1007
October 25, 2013, 04:28:25 PM
#19


There are no orders being shipped that were ordered a year ago, please stop spreading false information.  Our failure rate on hardware is less than 1%, much better than industry average, so again, your argument is invalid.  

Sorry, but if you consider 400 - 1000+ units shipped per day in this industry to be "few devices" you need to have your head examined.

For somebody who purports to ignore the prattle on bitcointalk you responded very quickly.  Please read carefully.  I said almost a year, not over 1 year.  If you're going to nitpick (which you do play semantics all the time) get it right.  My order was shipped with over a 1 year delay BTW.  I ordered in June 2012 and it shipped a few days short of 13 months.  Minirig owners did not see their full purchased hashing power for almost 14 months.

I doubt your failure rate is less than 1%.  Most computer hardware has rates exceeding that failure rate and admittedly no ASIC vendor would make such ridiculous claims.  I'm sure those ASICminer USB sticks are close to 2-3% and BFL is probably closer to 5% judging by what is said on the forums.  I can't fault the company or it's employees for having something break since we are human and the devices were assembled by human hands.  I can justly rail all I want for not getting a reply for 8 days for my RMA - the downtime cost me over 10BTC which is roughly $2k right now.  That is inexcusable.

I did choose to purchase from BFL willingly - it was my choice.  I choose to stick with the company and by the time I decided to ask for a refund your company redacted their refund offering.  I do like your product, but I have lost quite a bit of BTC (I paid in BTC) by buying it seeing as how I was suckered in believing the devices would ship sometime in October.....2012.   I believe you are currently the face of the company - if you can sleep with that at night...
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Updated ironic image.
October 25, 2013, 04:18:52 PM
#18
There are no orders being shipped that were ordered a year ago, please stop spreading false information.  Our failure rate on hardware is less than 1%, much better than industry average, so again, your argument is invalid.  

You shipped October and November 2012 orders in September 2013. Well done. One month short of a year. Stop playing with verb tenses to try and win arguments. You are such a giant bullshitter. Please stop spreading false information.

P.S. http://avalon-asics.com/product/avalon-mini-60ghs/ Prices reduced due to difficulty. In stock.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
October 25, 2013, 04:13:46 PM
#17
People are finding out it's not as easy to create a brand new product as they would have you believe, that's what's happening.  Even the people using others IP can't bring products to market (Look at Bicknellski's failed ventures) with all of the parts already laid out for them, much less create anything from scratch.

Surprise!  It actually requires skill, commitment and dedication to create a new product and bring it to market.



1) create product [check]
2) bring to market [....uh....check?]
3) fulfill all pre-orders and sell from in-hand stock [i guess in two weeks...right now you are shipping preorders 2-4months later than initially 'promised'/suggested]
4) take preorders on next-gen product that is rediculously overpriced by today's standards, and promise to deliver it before the 110nm preorders are filled

Can you point to a vendor that's doing number 3 now?  Are you seriously complaining that because demand is exceeding supply, it is somehow the vendors fault?

As for 4, I have no idea what you are talking about. BFL doesn't have any 110nm products and again, are you seriously complaining about the fact that people are paying money for a given product and the vendor charges what people will pay... but it's "overpriced" even though people are paying it?  If it was overpriced, people wouldn't buy it - that is simple economics.  If you think it's over priced, don't buy it.  The majority of the market disagrees with you, so that makes you the one that is incorrect.  

So basically points 3 and 4 are invalid and you have proven my point.


you cant be serious? asicminer, bitfury, and avalon are all selling units that are available immediately.

Huh, Avalon, really?  Last I checked, they had imploded.  Bitfury shows out of stock on all products.  ASICminer was order and wait last time I looked, but perhaps that's changed, I don't keep up with them much.  Please provide links otherwise?

Oh really?  As one of the few shipping ASIC vendors, I think that makes me qualified to speak on the subject, unlike you.  What have you done to bring a new product to the market from scratch?  Oh that's right... nothing at all.




How loose your definitions are. Roll Eyes  By shipping, do you mean shipping stuff today for items that were ordered almost a year ago?  Shipping items in variations much different than what was ordered?  Shipping out hardware that mines for 2 days and then dies and have to wait 8 days for someday just to issue an RMA even after requesting in email, forums, shoutbox, etc?

There are no orders being shipped that were ordered a year ago, please stop spreading false information.  Our failure rate on hardware is less than 1%, much better than industry average, so again, your argument is invalid.  

Sorry, but if you consider 400 - 1000+ units shipped per day in this industry to be "few devices" you need to have your head examined.

hero member
Activity: 873
Merit: 1007
October 25, 2013, 04:08:11 PM
#16
Oh really?  As one of the few shipping ASIC vendors, I think that makes me qualified to speak on the subject, unlike you.  What have you done to bring a new product to the market from scratch?  Oh that's right... nothing at all.




How loose your definitions are. Roll Eyes  By shipping, do you mean shipping stuff today for items that were ordered almost a year ago?  Shipping items in variations much different than what was ordered?  Shipping out hardware that mines for 2 days and then dies and have to wait 8 days for someday just to issue an RMA even after requesting in email, forums, shoutbox, etc?

Let me fix that for you:

Oh really?  As one of the ASIC vendors shipping few devices, I think that makes me INABAble to speak on the subject, unlike you.  What have I done to bring a new product to the market from scratch?  Oh that's right... nothing at all.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Updated ironic image.
October 25, 2013, 03:45:27 PM
#15
If it was overpriced (ed: the Monarch), people wouldn't buy it - that is simple economics.  If you think it's over priced, don't buy it.  The majority of the market disagrees with you, so that makes you the one that is incorrect. 

The majority of the market is buying the Monarch? Interesting. Having another spreadsheet moment, Josh? Maths, words, difficulty. I know. It's ok, you make us all laugh and entertain us. We love you for it.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
October 25, 2013, 03:19:30 PM
#14
People are finding out it's not as easy to create a brand new product as they would have you believe, that's what's happening.  Even the people using others IP can't bring products to market (Look at Bicknellski's failed ventures) with all of the parts already laid out for them, much less create anything from scratch.

Surprise!  It actually requires skill, commitment and dedication to create a new product and bring it to market.



1) create product [check]
2) bring to market [....uh....check?]
3) fulfill all pre-orders and sell from in-hand stock [i guess in two weeks...right now you are shipping preorders 2-4months later than initially 'promised'/suggested]
4) take preorders on next-gen product that is rediculously overpriced by today's standards, and promise to deliver it before the 110nm preorders are filled

Can you point to a vendor that's doing number 3 now?  Are you seriously complaining that because demand is exceeding supply, it is somehow the vendors fault?

As for 4, I have no idea what you are talking about. BFL doesn't have any 110nm products and again, are you seriously complaining about the fact that people are paying money for a given product and the vendor charges what people will pay... but it's "overpriced" even though people are paying it?  If it was overpriced, people wouldn't buy it - that is simple economics.  If you think it's over priced, don't buy it.  The majority of the market disagrees with you, so that makes you the one that is incorrect. 

So basically points 3 and 4 are invalid and you have proven my point.


you cant be serious? asicminer, bitfury, and avalon are all selling units that are available immediately.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
I run Linux on my abacus.
October 25, 2013, 03:16:35 PM
#13
Surprise!  It actually requires skill, commitment and dedication to create a new product and bring it to market.

That explains then why BFL is the laughing stock of the ASIC market Grin

How's the PayPal refunds going btw?
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
October 25, 2013, 03:02:31 PM
#12
People are finding out it's not as easy to create a brand new product as they would have you believe, that's what's happening.  Even the people using others IP can't bring products to market (Look at Bicknellski's failed ventures) with all of the parts already laid out for them, much less create anything from scratch.

Surprise!  It actually requires skill, commitment and dedication to create a new product and bring it to market.



1) create product [check]
2) bring to market [....uh....check?]
3) fulfill all pre-orders and sell from in-hand stock [i guess in two weeks...right now you are shipping preorders 2-4months later than initially 'promised'/suggested]
4) take preorders on next-gen product that is rediculously overpriced by today's standards, and promise to deliver it before the 110nm preorders are filled

Can you point to a vendor that's doing number 3 now?  Are you seriously complaining that because demand is exceeding supply, it is somehow the vendors fault?

As for 4, I have no idea what you are talking about. BFL doesn't have any 110nm products and again, are you seriously complaining about the fact that people are paying money for a given product and the vendor charges what people will pay... but it's "overpriced" even though people are paying it?  If it was overpriced, people wouldn't buy it - that is simple economics.  If you think it's over priced, don't buy it.  The majority of the market disagrees with you, so that makes you the one that is incorrect. 

So basically points 3 and 4 are invalid and you have proven my point.
legendary
Activity: 1121
Merit: 1003
October 25, 2013, 02:36:26 PM
#11
Oh really?  As one of the few shipping ASIC vendors, I think that makes me qualified to speak on the subject, unlike you.  What have you done to bring a new product to the market from scratch?  Oh that's right... nothing at all.




yes, but if you create products that have negative ROI. What good are your products? It shouldn't take a year or so for people to get what they pay for. Anyhow, we won't go there. There is a thread called "BFL fucks everyone over" where your fan base is.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
October 25, 2013, 02:27:47 PM
#10
People are finding out it's not as easy to create a brand new product as they would have you believe, that's what's happening.  Even the people using others IP can't bring products to market (Look at Bicknellski's failed ventures) with all of the parts already laid out for them, much less create anything from scratch.

Surprise!  It actually requires skill, commitment and dedication to create a new product and bring it to market.



1) create product [check]
2) bring to market [....uh....check?]
3) fulfill all pre-orders and sell from in-hand stock [i guess in two weeks...right now you are shipping preorders 2-4months later than initially 'promised'/suggested]
4) take preorders on next-gen product that is rediculously overpriced by today's standards, and promise to deliver it before the 110nm preorders are filled
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Updated ironic image.
October 25, 2013, 02:26:34 PM
#9
Oh really?  As one of the few shipping ASIC vendors, I think that makes me qualified to speak on the subject, unlike you.  What have you done to bring a new product to the market from scratch?  Oh that's right... nothing at all.

Someone's wearing big boy pants today.
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
October 25, 2013, 02:21:43 PM
#8
Oh really?  As one of the few shipping ASIC vendors, I think that makes me qualified to speak on the subject, unlike you.  What have you done to bring a new product to the market from scratch?  Oh that's right... nothing at all.


hero member
Activity: 504
Merit: 500
October 25, 2013, 01:26:25 PM
#7
Surprise!  It actually requires skill, commitment and dedication to create a new product and bring it to market.




BFL  dont stir the pot please.... you are the last person that should be casting stones...
mrb
legendary
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1028
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Updated ironic image.
October 25, 2013, 01:06:29 PM
#5
Surprise!  It actually requires skill, commitment and dedication to create a new product and bring it to market.

legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
October 25, 2013, 12:36:23 PM
#4
People are finding out it's not as easy to create a brand new product as they would have you believe, that's what's happening.  Even the people using others IP can't bring products to market (Look at Bicknellski's failed ventures) with all of the parts already laid out for them, much less create anything from scratch.

Surprise!  It actually requires skill, commitment and dedication to create a new product and bring it to market.

sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
October 25, 2013, 12:28:54 PM
#3
Yep, buy only what they can ship immediately. With the current and coming difficulty levels you can't afford a delay with unfinished pre-order product.

Profitability is going down even more, just because more people are dividing that 25BTC per block with all their shiny new ASICs.
hero member
Activity: 784
Merit: 1004
Glow Stick Dance!
October 25, 2013, 08:59:51 AM
#2
Preorder money dried up because of market over-saturation and spiking difficulty.  It's probably not possible to raise enough preorder funds to cover NRE costs.

I suspect we'll even see some of the current ASIC vendors close shop in the next couple of months and some preorders may just fizzle out before they can come to market.  It will make the bASIC fiasco look like a picnic.  Prepare for the coming bloodbath.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
October 24, 2013, 07:00:27 AM
#1
Call me curious, but where are new vendors?  BFL is still in wtf territory, people are trying to recoup from their Avalon investments, Bitfury is raging but not really profitable, KNC is fixing their issues but proved very sloppy in their roll out, and a few other are close to shipping but sans hardware in hands for verification, but if you looked around here a few months back it seemed like there was a new ASIC vendor popping up every other week.  Even AM has fallen out of the spotlight and is more of a footnote in mining (or a joke on the group buy section).

We've seen the "must happen" rise in price to make people feel better about their hardware, but what we're not seeing is what comes next.  If it takes 3-6 months from design to implementation and delivery, nobody is talking about the February-May time-frame next year whatsoever other than current companies who will be selling the same exact machines at a lower profit margin.

Since I haven't been around since the days of CPU mining being viable, what do the old-timers think about this?  Is this about what it was like in the GPU era, a slew of excitement followed by a long, dark path where nobody knows what comes next because nothing really pans out value-wise?
Jump to: