Topic: Where do we go from here - page 5. (Read 726 times)

You should better know that Elon musk is not different from politician, he is just lucky to be a business man by view but dip down, Elon empire is surrounded by politician and that is how the behave from the way they say things, they will say what they fear people to do them and will later do the same thing. I could remember when he bought twitter, he was saying it was a free speech social media but was suspending accounts that were trolling him and was mad about things they say to him and later change mind when he saw that people will live the social media for another one, trust him at your own peril.

This will always raise pros and cons, it is unavoidable. For those who say AI is dangerous for human survival, you can say yes and you can say no, it depends on ourselves. The development of AI is becoming very rapid and it can be said that it will be smarter than humans, and many say that maybe in the future it will replace the role of humans.
We shouldn't be skeptical about this, instead we ourselves have to make us more qualified. The existence of AI is also driven from us as humans, there is no history of creating being shifted by what is being created. So improve our quality as human beings.

When AI decides that humans are posing threats then there will be a problem, I think they are programmed to act in a certain manner. My own contribution is that if there is the implementation of AI some workers will be laid off.

I don't worry much about Elon since he usually seems to make decisions without reason, but thinking about how much harm an AI can do I'm still skeptical or rather it still seems too early to talk about evolution, surely there will be a future much worse than our present and I hope it will happen as late as possible.

It's funny how both of the seeming pioneers in this realm (or at least the largest names whose companies are working on AI related products) both say that they are fearful of AI and its potential effect on humanity. If that's the case, then why are we even putting the energy into this creation, or why isn't more effort being put into policies, safeguard, research etc before it goes further? I believe that we should focus on mastering blockchain, something that empowers humans, instead of creating something that has the potential to become a threatening adversary. That's just me though.

They say Elon used to be an investor of that ChatGPT and then he suddenly changes his mind and opposed it after learning what it can do.  Quite an interesting story so I wonder how deeply they'd developed the AI that he actually decided to oppose it. If it's something like the Eagle Eye movie in which the AI decides for the future of humanity, then I guess it needs to be stopped.

It's enough already that robots took away the jobs of people. But I would sure depend on who holds the AI industry. Because if they are twisted, sure thing they will also develop twisted bots.

Most people will say that we should stop this, but right now, the status of AI is really progressive and unstoppable. Even Elon said in the interview that he is scared of AI and that the possibility that AI will get rid of us in the future is pretty high when they know everything, which he said is possible in the future but for sure we, the current generation, will not experience this; it will happen in the next few decades. This is really the future, as Elon stated, because, if we look on the bright side, AI will make our lives easy.

Just a vague assumption I guess. No matter how intelligent technologies become, it is humans who made it and for sure that would be the main thing. Many people are threatened by this possibility without seeing how beneficial it would be. Advancements such as AI are meant to make our lives easier 'coz if not, why would professionals waste their time doing these technological progress. It would only be a bad thing if we would be dependent with these advancements, which is something we should deal with as individuals. I'm seeing a better future because of technologies and innovation. Why? 'coz we have to adapt with 'evolution'. Being left behind would be far worse from being replaced by these 'robots'. There are things these investions won't be able to do and you have to take it as an edge to se for a brighter future.

If these individuals are concerned about AI and their destruction potential, why are they the main sponsors and enthusiasts of AI technology in the world? I believe they just fear something they can't control, and that is why they try to keep it under their control by developing it. However, as long as AI is controlled by them, it won't be an issue.

We will continue on the same path we have been. Technology gets more advanced, AI becomes more popular and present in our daily life on different sectors of society, their developers get wealthy and influent, nothing really changes regards status for the average citizen.

Although technolgy advances, the structure of society remains the same.

I don't think we're going to face the problems that AI can create any time soon. Right now it's a useful tool that simplifies our work but doesn't completely replace it until the final progress, I think we'll have to wait a long time.

rule 1 is subjective.   the current AI like the heavily bias chat gpt is going to give you the wrong answers to rule 1. 

It's worrisome but since AI is built by humans it is possible to create some manual shutdown to such technology, oh, I may be wrong, AI are very smart and they can notice this safe shutdown process and find a way to bypass it, I hope this won't happen and those building AI need to be very careful with what they feed AI, too much of information can be used against us.

If someone like Bill and Musk can feel this way about AI who am I to think otherwise?

All the technology you see today was once fiction. And I can say that the first machines issued were considered a threat to the equine transport profession, the presence of telephones was a threat to the carrier pigeon company. Did they stop? No, they're starting to transition.
Like it or not, you won't be able to get out and will unconsciously coexist. It will be a benefit or a disaster depending on which side you welcome any new technology.

Elon is now a believer of AI after he became the cofounder of the leading technology Chat GPT. There’s always an advantage and disadvantage on every cutting edge technology like the invention of Atomic bomb that stop the war but open up with a more dangerous was in the future.

The problem is not the AI technology but the greedy human that will use it in evil things. AI technology is very helpful to make our life easier by letting robot do our task so that we can focus on other task. I’m supporting this AI technology it’s use is greater than the potential risk which is currently a fictional.

I watched a movie on Netflix I just forgot the title of that show where the story is about an AI robot.
The one who invented the AI robot was eventually killed by the Robot who created him. So what you are saying is that there
is a truth that AI robots do pose a threat to humans. And so is the human in AI.

I have used it to communicate with AI, and what I am impressed with is the quick and accurate response of some information. However, when going deeper, it is completely inaccurate and becomes fabricated, and the problem is to refer to the information, not treat it as a source of information. And when I got into the details of the ethics of AI, I received a response that left me both skeptical and fearful of the prospect of being dominated by machines. When in the development of AI, we all raise the issue of ethics in use, and I see not only this tool but every tool that helps people we need to uphold the ethical issue in our use.

The programmer can just put rules for the AI.
1. Don't hurt humans
2. You can't overwrite rules, etc.

Something like that and the problem is solved. Elon is just smoking some weed before doing the interview.
Also, people should define "smart" before giving a bombastic statement like "AI can be smarter than us." Thus since AI is not that smart, it's not a good idea to delegate control to the AI, or at least, there should a mechanism to do a manual override.

the development of ai is inevitable, ai will enter human life whether we like it or not,, it will be integrated with our various devices and we must be able to adapt to it .. what needs to be considered here is how we as users can take advantage of this ai to help us solve various problems such as completing simple jobs, etc. the point is we have to be wiser in using this technology

A robot threatening Elon musk is almost fictional like really, a robot programmed to do the assigned task can threaten a person (Elon) on its own. That is not digestible. Because these things can improvise over time and there is no doubt about that and can think faster than the human mind as their processing speed is higher than humans. But the robot is a robot.

As big icons of tech industries like Bill Gates have mentioned in there some interviews, now is the era of AI which will change the way of thinking, learning, doing work and jobs, etc. So coming back to your question, life will really change as I am so dependent on AI tools for my courses that whenever I face a problem I ask Ai tools. Some times i think how i lived these years without it.

Yeah, then i realize i am depending on it which is not good for me. Overall, it will change the way we think, learn, act and perform along with harms to our minds. I dont understand if you taking the revolution of AI as dominant over humans like happens in sci-fi movies. "No" Robots will not rule the world (harm us) instead we will allow them to rules us. How? By depending on them so much that we cannot do any work without them.

On other hand AI technologies can maximize the harm rate of pre-existing military weapons but that's another level of discussion we should avoid doin here.

That's correct; his thought was that if AI turns out to be on the dark side, the human race may be at risk.

AI imagine things most times that a human being may not imagine; Elon said "they think far beyond themselves." But I still believe there is no way AI can outright or override human; although they are machines built with some super technology, humans can still destroy what they create afterwards if they become too powerful. I just say what I think, though.

There's a proverb that says, "An okra plant doesn't outgrow the person who plants it; no matter how tall it grows, when the owner wants to harvest it, they still bend the stems down and harvest the okra."

If AI becomes a threat to humanity, the people who built it can destroy it.


That's the video where Elon speaks about the AI threat: https://youtu.be/Qj-iz6MByZg