Topic: WHERE IS TMAN? for 1 month of inactivity 🤔🤔 - page 3. (Read 3355 times)
Everyone just relax, all is well with TMAN. I spoke with him recently and he's actually doing better than ever (his words not mine). He told me he woke up one day and had an epiphany from god. Apparently he has opened his own ministry, and is preaching the word of the lord while also goat herding ( a biblical action that was once Josheph's way of life). He said he's over calling everyone prized cunts and will be coming back here soon to preach the word of the lord. "Bitcoin and Prayer" as he phrased it.
TMAN is obviously pulling an exit scam.
I've figured out his plan is to increase the value of his account by not logging in.
I just haven't figured out how he plans to profit...
(IMAN we miss you)
I've figured out his plan is to increase the value of his account by not logging in.
I just haven't figured out how he plans to profit...
(IMAN we miss you)
You are suggesting everytime tman posts it devalues his account further? Seems many here share that view.
Hmm well to profit it is simple. He will buy it from himself and snag a bargain . He likes that one. Gets them everytime.
Oh well, the tourette's poet is not to everyones taste.
However, if you look at tmans last posts where his tourettes clearly triggered on a mod over his post being correctly deleted. I suspect a ban. Oh well.
Perhaps there are some other poets out there on bitcoin talk, we have his pal lord byron here in his stead.
Although his work is obviously nowhere near the standard that tman produces.
TMAN is obviously pulling an exit scam.
I've figured out his plan is to increase the value of his account by not logging in.
I just haven't figured out how he plans to profit...
(IMAN we miss you)
I've figured out his plan is to increase the value of his account by not logging in.
I just haven't figured out how he plans to profit...
(IMAN we miss you)
Nope his karma hits him hard,you should be the next one to disappear.
Old habits die hard.Looking at the feedback that was left on your profile. I would say it was 100% accurate and deserved.
Certainly he was not banned, according to Bpip.
Only permanent bans are publicly shown in modlog, so BPIP can't show temporary bans. But I don't think that's the case, even banned users can still be online, and TMAN hasn't been online. Besides, I'd expect some unique poetry in Meta if he was really banned.He was helping me with a collectible on Telegram, then he just disappeared. So it's not a bitcointalk thing.
Has anyone asked elmanchez? TMAN was working on a project with him a while ago.
snip..
I'm not sure what country he lives, but if its in US, I know they have the biggest case for covid-19.
Certainly he was not banned, according to Bpip.
Only permanent bans are publicly shown in modlog, so BPIP can't show temporary bans. But I don't think that's the case, even banned users can still be online, and TMAN hasn't been online. Besides, I'd expect some unique poetry in Meta if he was really banned.He was helping me with a collectible on Telegram, then he just disappeared. So it's not a bitcointalk thing.
Certainly he was not banned, according to Bpip.
Only permanent bans are publicly shown in modlog, so BPIP can't show temporary bans. But I don't think that's the case, even banned users can still be online, and TMAN hasn't been online. Besides, I'd expect some unique poetry in Meta if he was really banned.
Hope you can teach me to invest in cryptocurrency WHTSAPP85251752303 I am a Chinese girl hope someone can help me
legendary
Activity: 1680
Merit: 6524
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
Perhaps tman was banned?
If this is the reason, for sure he will come back soon because he is not in perma ban, I checked his profile and he still got that signature on it. Maybe he tried to focus his time with his family, I'm not sure what country he lives, but if its in US, I know they have the biggest case for covid-19.
Perhaps tman was banned?
Maybe it's not a big issue but i think dt members should be always active as their feedbacks is publicy shown and may need updates.
DT members aren't obliged to 'be always active' in any form or way. Most feedback is left with a valid reason and shouldn't need to be revised that often either.
It seems to me that questions around DT member activity revolve around what theymos said in this below-attached post regarding his tweaking of the DT1 list criteria on about a monthly basis, which seems to have some activity criteria.. sure it is not "always" active, but requires being on line and posting as I bolded those two lines, below:
............
#3
I will periodically (maybe every month) be reconstructing the default trust list to include everyone who matches these criteria:
- If rank was determined solely using earned merit, then you must be of at least Member rank.
- You must have been online sometime within the last 3 days.
- Your trust list must include at least 10 users, not including ~distrust entries.
- You must not be banned or manually blacklisted from selection.
- You must have posted sometime within the last 30 days.
- You must have at least 10 people directly trusting you each with an earned merit of at least 10, not including merit you yourself sent. These "votes" are limited.
- You must have at least 2 people directly trusting you with an earned merit of at least 250, not including merit you yourself sent. These "votes" are limited.
..........
#3
I will periodically (maybe every month) be reconstructing the default trust list to include everyone who matches these criteria:
- If rank was determined solely using earned merit, then you must be of at least Member rank.
- You must have been online sometime within the last 3 days.
- Your trust list must include at least 10 users, not including ~distrust entries.
- You must not be banned or manually blacklisted from selection.
- You must have posted sometime within the last 30 days.
- You must have at least 10 people directly trusting you each with an earned merit of at least 10, not including merit you yourself sent. These "votes" are limited.
- You must have at least 2 people directly trusting you with an earned merit of at least 250, not including merit you yourself sent. These "votes" are limited.
..........
That's not what I meant. I agree with Theymos' rules, inactive members should be removed from DT1. I meant that DT members are not obliged to stay active, just because they have left negative feedback.
Your opinion is extreme. Feedback with a valid reason can also be revised and changed and even removed.
I didn't say feedback shouldn't be revised. I said it shouldn't be revised that often, which is a big difference.
If a DT1 user doesn't post for a couple of days around the start of the month then they miss out on being in the group that are randomly selected for DT1. If they aren't selected for DT1 then they would be DT2 under a few different circumstances so their trust feedbacks would still be visible. (Any feedback is visible if you know where to look)
I believe that you only need to post once in the last 30 days. However, you do have to be active within the last few days.
It’s 3 days of inactivity that will cost you your coveted spot
You’re right though, you only need to post once a month.
If a DT1 user doesn't post for a couple of days around the start of the month then they miss out on being in the group that are randomly selected for DT1. If they aren't selected for DT1 then they would be DT2 under a few different circumstances so their trust feedbacks would still be visible. (Any feedback is visible if you know where to look)
I believe that you only need to post once in the last 30 days. However, you do have to be active within the last few days.
If a DT1 user doesn't post for a couple of days around the start of the month then they miss out on being in the group that are randomly selected for DT1. If they aren't selected for DT1 then they would be DT2 under a few different circumstances so their trust feedbacks would still be visible. (Any feedback is visible if you know where to look)
Maybe it's not a big issue but i think dt members should be always active as their feedbacks is publicy shown and may need updates.
DT members aren't obliged to 'be always active' in any form or way. Most feedback is left with a valid reason and shouldn't need to be revised that often either.
As your feedback can be shown on others profiles, and as you are the only one who can change/remove it, you should always be responsible by being active or ask to be removed from DT lists if you are planning for a medium/long term inactivity.
I recall seeing other proposals for expiration of feedback, or maybe negatives convert to neutrals, but surely there might be some cases, like you mentioned, in which a member might need to reconsider feedback that s/he has given.
As a policy consideration, it seems more difficult to actually require that a member has to do something (such as reconsider feedback that he gave) based on his/her having had already done something...even though that negative would end up showing up forever on an account (or situation) that the vast majority (or even everyone else) had decided to remove or to change their feedback.
Maybe it's not a big issue but i think dt members should be always active as their feedbacks is publicy shown and may need updates.
DT members aren't obliged to 'be always active' in any form or way. Most feedback is left with a valid reason and shouldn't need to be revised that often either.
Maybe it's not a big issue but i think dt members should be always active as their feedbacks is publicy shown and may need updates.
DT members aren't obliged to 'be always active' in any form or way. Most feedback is left with a valid reason and shouldn't need to be revised that often either.
As your feedback can be shown on others profiles, and as you are the only one who can change/remove it, you should always be responsible by being active or ask to be removed from DT lists if you are planning for a medium/long term inactivity.
Jump to: