The main reason I picked a low value like 0.01 - if stored on one address it would be likely to see more addresses with higher balances associated to it. Even thought it might be baseless it could be assumed that this person owns a lot more than what is seen on this one address.
Especially among the thugs there are lots of irrational actors and thus, even though objectively it's a low balance compared to other things that are much more easily accessible, might catch their attention.
So it was a random number then haha, if so, what should be the maximum amount before it becomes "risky" to reveal? And that was my point, 170 could be 5k, 10k (again, arbitrary), 10 could also be 10k or more in some very far future.
Trust me, there are people out there hunting for targets sure, but they're on the lookout for risky behaviour rather than scanning for arbitrary numbers.
It's not the amount, it's how easy a victim you might be, how low hanging a fruit you are.
So yeah, if you make a post about 0.005 or even 0.03 BTC in your wallet, sure that doesn't sound like much (because it isn't) but as soon as you reach higher numbers 0.1+ I'd say this is very attractive for scammers - much easier to scam for a digital asset like Bitcoin from someone publicly writing about it, than any other assets / items of value or "traditional money".
So what I am saying is, 0.01 is not a purely random number - better safe than sorry. Simply avoid talking about your "crypto wealth" if possible - starting from a very amount.