Pages:
Author

Topic: Where's the money, Lebowski? - page 4. (Read 8763 times)

hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
December 07, 2015, 09:46:45 AM
#17
Not first time people have raised concerns regarding Slickage - https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/concerned-about-slickage-studios-split-from-concern-about-the-forum-credit-idea-524113

I find it rather strange someone would give $2 million dollars to a complete stranger, theymos you lying?
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
December 07, 2015, 09:35:24 AM
#16
[...]
Speechless.
So what you're telling me is you have sent $1,950,000, nearly two million dollars, to someone you've "never even met them in person," a dead landing page, http://slickage.com/ ? And this, the most expensive forum software ever, isn't finished yet? And you're still sending 50k/mo to this Slickage?
[...]
Correction:
Quote from: Theymos
In December and January I paid a total of about $350,000 of forum funds to hire Slickage Studios, a software development firm. [...]
So make that $2,300,000 and counting.
legendary
Activity: 1582
Merit: 1064
December 07, 2015, 09:00:53 AM
#15
The project is quite a bit over-due and over-budget (the original estimate was 1 year and $1.2 million)

It seems a bit backwards to how I would have expected a contractor to be remunerated.

1. I give you a project brief
2. You give me a quote
3. We agree on a price
4. I pay a portion upfront
5a. You deliver it on time
5b. You deliver it late
6. I pay you the remainder on delivery.

In either scenario they get paid the same - for doing the work that was agreed. Giving someone such a lucrative incentive to do work slower not to deliver seems a recipe for disaster.

It is the classic question on how to bill - time & material or fixed price.  Smiley
In the list above, if your project brief changes even a little bit, you will have to figure out a way to incorporate it into your contract price (if you go in for a fixed price contract). I am sure the requirements have evolved as the project has progressed.
copper member
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1528
No I dont escrow anymore.
December 07, 2015, 08:45:13 AM
#14
The project is quite a bit over-due and over-budget (the original estimate was 1 year and $1.2 million)

It seems a bit backwards to how I would have expected a contractor to be remunerated.

1. I give you a project brief
2. You give me a quote
3. We agree on a price
4. I pay a portion upfront
5a. You deliver it on time
5b. You deliver it late
6. I pay you the remainder on delivery.

In either scenario they get paid the same - for doing the work that was agreed. Giving someone such a lucrative incentive to do work slower not to deliver seems a recipe for disaster.

If you want to see what happens if you give devs a too strick deadline look at videogame releases. Its common that projects (any really, not only software) take longer and require more money. The question is whether you want what you asked for or a set price. If you want exactly what you asked for or something as close as possible you will have to grand more time and/or money. You cant know all problems the developers will run into in advance. I am under the impression that theymos rather wants something solid than something thats done on time or done with a given amount of money. This has certainly limits, but as long as there are funds for the development I dont see an issue.

>inb4 Im brown nosing, have no idea, yadda yadda.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
December 06, 2015, 06:36:39 PM
#13
The project is quite a bit over-due and over-budget (the original estimate was 1 year and $1.2 million)

It seems a bit backwards to how I would have expected a contractor to be remunerated.

1. I give you a project brief
2. You give me a quote
3. We agree on a price
4. I pay a portion upfront
5a. You deliver it on time
5b. You deliver it late
6. I pay you the remainder on delivery.

In either scenario they get paid the same - for doing the work that was agreed. Giving someone such a lucrative incentive to do work slower not to deliver seems a recipe for disaster.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
December 06, 2015, 05:46:12 PM
#12
The forum money I held has largely been spent now, mostly in the forum software project. Slickage was paid $100,000 per month in all of 2014 and until May in 2015. Since June 2015, they've been paid $50,000 per month. The exchange rate varied substantially throughout this period, but the end result is that most of the BTC was spent.

The rate ($85,417/month average as of the end of 2015) might seem high to people unfamiliar with professional software development, but it's normal. The project is quite a bit over-due and over-budget (the original estimate was 1 year and $1.2 million), but I've been constantly monitoring Slickage, and they've definitely been making solid, continual progress, so it seemed correct to continue to project. The vast majority of total forum revenue was from ads, not donations, but to the extent that donations were used: this software was in fact the main stated goal of donations.

As I've said before: I have absolutely no personal relationship to Slickage, and I receive no "kickbacks" whatsoever. I've never even met them in person. I first learned of Slickage from Warren Togami, who had previously done a lot of work for the forum and was himself recommended by gmaxwell and others. (I've also never met Warren in person.)

The current status of the software is that it's ~85% done. The core of it is entirely functional and often much better/faster than SMF, though there are still several missing features. There will be a public beta before the end of the month, I think, at which time I'll post more about what's left to be done. Also see http://epochtalk.org/ for more info.

Speechless.
So what you're telling me is you have sent $1,950,000, nearly two million dollars, to someone you've "never even met them in person," a dead landing page, http://slickage.com/ ? And this, the most expensive forum software ever, isn't finished yet? And you're still sending 50k/mo to this Slickage?

Is there a fancy GPG-signed contract "non-legal agreement between The Bitcoin Forum ("Forum") and Slickage [...] intended to be enforced in a non-violent, non-legal way by the community"?
Or was this a handshake deal? I take it the drop to 50k/mo is the late completion clause?
Anyhow, cool story bro, but hope you don't expect it to fly IRL.
administrator
Activity: 5222
Merit: 13032
December 06, 2015, 03:48:29 PM
#11
The forum money I held has largely been spent now, mostly in the forum software project. Slickage was paid $100,000 per month in all of 2014 and until May in 2015. Since June 2015, they've been paid $50,000 per month. The exchange rate varied substantially throughout this period, but the end result is that most of the BTC was spent.

The rate ($85,417/month average as of the end of 2015) might seem high to people unfamiliar with professional software development, but it's normal. The project is quite a bit over-due and over-budget (the original estimate was 1 year and $1.2 million), but I've been constantly monitoring Slickage, and they've definitely been making solid, continual progress, so it seemed correct to continue to project. The vast majority of total forum revenue was from ads, not donations, but to the extent that donations were used: this software was in fact the main stated goal of donations.

As I've said before: I have absolutely no personal relationship to Slickage, and I receive no "kickbacks" whatsoever. I've never even met them in person. I first learned of Slickage from Warren Togami, who had previously done a lot of work for the forum and was himself recommended by gmaxwell and others. (I've also never met Warren in person.)

The current status of the software is that it's ~85% done. The core of it is entirely functional and often much better/faster than SMF, though there are still several missing features. There will be a public beta before the end of the month, I think, at which time I'll post more about what's left to be done. Also see http://epochtalk.org/ for more info.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
December 06, 2015, 02:51:31 PM
#10
After your last post it seems to me like you're trying to troll. Nobody likes trolls here. Regardless, is it really important where the money is? If so, why?
>is it really important where the money is?
Is how millions of $$$ in donations to bitcointalk was spent important?

>If so, why?
Because the money was not gifted to theymos, it was donated to bitcointalk.
Because the money is vanishing, with nothing to show for it.
Because it looks like a large chunk of the money, for which theymos is responsible, seems to be missing.
Because that shit is called embezzlement.
Because either you know and are being evasive, or you do not, in which case kindly not clutter up the thread. This means you too, redsn0w.
Need more?
legendary
Activity: 1778
Merit: 1043
#Free market
December 06, 2015, 02:45:25 PM
#9
Another troll, fantastic Roll Eyes !


Maybe you are only jealous because you don't have or you will not have (ever) those btc/money.
legendary
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
December 06, 2015, 02:10:18 PM
#8
After your last post it seems to me like you're trying to troll. Nobody likes trolls here. Regardless, is it really important where the money is? If so, why?
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
December 06, 2015, 01:09:31 PM
#7
Regardless of if theymos wants to admit it or not, the forum's BTC most likely legally belongs to theymos.

I think it is somewhat of a moot point to ask where theymos's own money is. Unless of course the point of asking is to troll.....

>Regardless of if theymos wants to admit it or not
A detail quite relevant to teh taxman.

>Unless of course the point of asking is to troll
Please don't bother commenting on things you don't understand, unless, ofc, you're just trying to suck up to theymos.
copper member
Activity: 2996
Merit: 2374
December 06, 2015, 01:03:30 PM
#6
Regardless of if theymos wants to admit it or not, the forum's BTC most likely legally belongs to theymos.

I think it is somewhat of a moot point to ask where theymos's own money is. Unless of course the point of asking is to troll.....
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
December 06, 2015, 01:00:52 PM
#5
Can you read properly? All of those apart from theymos's address have the proper amount of Bitcoin or more.
However, 250BTC of that from paraipan is lost since AFAIK he passed away a year or two ago.

Sure they are. Click on the contracts.
What do you mean?

The post has also been updated recently, June 11 of this year.
Yeah, I believe a treasurer was removed as he/his wife tried to extort the forum to have a post removed.

>What do you mean
I mean click on the pastebin links. From there on, should be self-explanatory.

>Yeah, I believe
A public ledger edited with an eraser? Why not leave the original unaltered?
legendary
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1268
In Memory of Zepher
December 06, 2015, 12:57:00 PM
#4
Can you read properly? All of those apart from theymos's address have the proper amount of Bitcoin or more.
However, 250BTC of that from paraipan is lost since AFAIK he passed away a year or two ago.

Sure they are. Click on the contracts.
What do you mean?

The post has also been updated recently, June 11 of this year.
Yeah, I believe a treasurer was removed as he/his wife tried to extort the forum to have a post removed.
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
December 06, 2015, 12:54:32 PM
#3
None of them is empty

Sure they are. Click on the contracts.
The post has also been updated recently, June 11 of this year.

And if splitting among multiple addys, what's the point of posting the addys where the money's not at? Lel?
staff
Activity: 3500
Merit: 6152
December 06, 2015, 12:49:46 PM
#2
None of them is empty , only one have less funds is the one that belongs to theymos and I'm pretty sure those funds was used to start funding the new forum software or simply he split them to different addresses in case things goes wrong for one reason or another .
newbie
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
December 06, 2015, 12:45:18 PM
#1
TL;DR: half of the addies are now empty.

Treasurers
March 19, 2013, 06:23:02 PM (edited June 11, 2015)
   
 #1
The forum's bitcoins are currently held by the following people.

Person   Amount      Fee (monthly)      Next fee payment      Address
paraipan   250   0.208   2014-04-19   1PFkqgBBrSKikyyUGDerZMfzvCNPgKrR3o
Rassah   750   0   -    1HQ8WaKVRYXLBtVdMcYr5SHQ3X9BsLyxa1
OgNasty   500   0.5   2014-11-22   1Eog8UqRFLufC71rBLt2nYgfUDskgxAyVF
theymos   ~4000   0   -    1M4yNbSCwSMFLF9BaLqzoo2to1WHtZrPke, et al.

Contracts
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=33E6kJ46
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=QKC7JWNJ
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=sw7X4JK6
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=XGyJFddU
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=t9h2pL2y
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=jkw3U4FU
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=xfXYUHU3

Pages:
Jump to: