Topic: Which campaign is better? Bounty campaign or Signature campaign? - page 4. (Read 626 times)

Signature is the best one and i think social media is a good too. Don't forget to choose the right bounty manager because it will have big impact for your bounty campaign. There so many good bounty manager in this forum, i believed irfan_pak is one of the best bounty manager in this forum.

Bounty campaigns are campaigns to promote the project on social media (Twitter, FB, Reddit, Linkedin, ..etc.) by bounty hunters, and there are many other different campaigns such as translation, content creation, Youtube Videos, and so on, and bounty hunters are paid at the end of the project’s tokens. As for signature campaigns, they are promoting the project in the forum by seasoned members here, according to rules that the signature campaign manager sets, and he must be a trusted and professional manager with a good reputation, and his account must contain positive trusts, and the participants in the signature campaign are paid in Bitcoin or any top currencies in the market, and my advice to you is if you are not ready to deal with the escrow service, as they reserve the bounty or the signature campaign tokens that will distribute at the end to the participants, do not think about launching them, and if your project is not 100% complete in development and complete in all aspects so take care of developing it first and finishing everything, before you think about promoting it through trusted bounty managers because you will usually find it difficult for them to accept your offer.

If it is to promote the project, eitherway is fine. But if it is the way to reward the participants and for the project itself, I think signature campaigns (pays in btc) would be better. One reason is what happened before. There were many bounty campaigns paying rewards in form of the project token. Profit is way bigger than with signatures, but it has something to do with long term progress of a project. The moment bounty hunters recieved their rewards, they tend to sell it immediately which causes a huge dump with the token's market value, affecting long term potential of the project.

And for participants' end, I think signature is still better in a way that it has a fixed reward in btc. Indeed bounties will give you instances of way big  rewards but there'll also be times you'd be recieving small from a 3-month work.

Just run all of campaign at once and you will not confuse to pick which campaign that will better for your project. I think that if you will never able to determine it as the campaign has their own purpose but the main thing that must be remember if you shall become a trusted developer who will be paying your participants. It's not only hit and run.

Signature campaigns remain the best in this forum. But bounty campaigns like Twitter, Facebook, Tiktok are also very good for project owners so that their projects can be promoted on social media.

Signature campaigns give bounty hunters some money. And social media campaigns also provide the opportunity for bounty hunters to participate in more than one campaign.

I think both are great campaigns for project developers or for bounty hunters.
I think the video campaign is not good. My reason is because there are many video campaigns whose results are really bad. This is just my personal view.

at the moment I only participate in the signature, since at the moment at least some money is paid for this bounty, it makes little sense to participate in the rest, since they pay a penny, it used to be possible to participate in all social bounties and you could earn well, but this is already a long time in the future, just like airdrops, today they pay very little

There are still bounty campaigns that has a signature campaign inside of it. There aren't that much but it still exist on some bounty campaign that has a manager. We can see the decline of trend from before and today, I still believe on bounty campaign that still has a signature campaign on it. Knowing that they are willing to pay extra to signature codes and to a bounty manager but if the bounty doesnt even spend anything, it would be a redflag for me.

Base on your story, I think I'm one of the few users here that are kind of lucky at that time then.

We have different story in terms of bounty campaign back in 2017 to around 2018. Every campaign that I joined, I always get the tokens from it, and luckily I manage to sold every one of them. I only joined in a few bounty campaigns (around 5 I guess), and all 5 of them paid me the tokens, got listed in an exchange, and manage to sold all of them. That was the time where ICO are still hyped. After months of joining in a bounty campaign (paid with tokens), I stopped it already, and focused on campaigns which are paying Bitcoins.

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong with this one.

Bounty campaign is a general term consists of different types of campaign like Social media campaign, Telegram campaign, Blog campaign, and so on, and so forth. Signature campaign on the other hand, is one of the campaigns under the bounty campaign where you wear signature to advertise the project here.

Many think that signature campaign nowadays is different from bounty campaign, but back a few years ago signature campaign is one of the campaigns under bounty campaign. Now to answer your question OP, signature campaign (paid thru Bitcoins) is more effective than just bounty campaigns (different campaigns). Well, you can do trial and error. Hire a reputable manager here, try both campaigns. One where you are paying the participants with your own token, and one using Bitcoins.

They can only be effective for services that work with bitcoin. If the goal is to promote a new altcoin project, then a signature campaign paid in bitcoins may not be as effective as Bounty. As an example, you can think of the altcoins that tried to be promoted through a bitcoin signature campaign. They all had extremely short durations and ended quickly, whereas Bounty campaigns can last for months.

For me, both can be utilized to be a good marketing arm for your platform, get into signature campaign first, bitcoin paying and then see how it goes for you, maybe 1-2 months.

And then shift to the bounty campaigns, regardless of what it is, twitter, signature campaign and others. This will be the second layer for your campaign. But this time, it should be longer than the bitcoin paying signature campaign and it should be big as far as the number of participants. Just get a decent manager to run it for you.

Signature campaigns only in this forum mate. Signature campaigns are indeed effective within the Bitcointalk community as managed by experienced and qualified managers. Additionally, participants in signature campaigns are often influential and knowledgeable members of the forum, which adds credibility to the campaign. If FireDAO aims to expand its reach beyond the Bitcointalk community and target a global audience, then running a bounty campaign might be more suitable. Bounty campaigns can help grow social media presence, increase engagement on platforms like Twitter, Telegram, and Facebook, and encourage the creation of content to reach a wider audience.

Signature campaigns are the best option in my opinion as they offer weekly payouts at certain times. These Compaigns are limited and only allow participation by users who have accumulated sufficient Merits in the last 120 days which helps filter newbies and ensures higher quality posts. Participation in signature Compaigns requires cryptocurrency knowledge and experience allowing participants to discuss Bitcoin and other altcoins while gaining valuable information about the market. In addition a significant portion of campaign funds is often held in escrow to ensure payment security. Overall signing events provide a regular stream of income and require hard work quality and continuous skill development from participants.

Just from their names, the difference has already been mentioned, if you're interested in conducting a bounty campaign then you're making your payment in bounties but if you're interested in making payments in bitcoin then the best idea is on the signature campaign, you could now see that it's your choice and and preference especially the organization you will be managing under base on what they prefer to offer their campaign participants.

True, I rarely (almost never) see a high-rank and well-known user still do signature bounty that's paid not in stablecoins nowadays. It's common knowledge that signature bounties, especially those that are paid in low-volume tokens are the 2nd tier promotion here.

---

However, I understand that bounty is a good method to distribute your token, but if the dollar value of the token is not worth it, you'll only attract low-rank or spam accounts. It goes the same for the article and social media, you'll only attract article spinners and fake follower posts.

One of the solutions for this is to hire a reputable Bounty/Campaign Manager to screen the trash work. I previously work with Hhampuz, Roycilik, and Yahoo, and they are legit.

We assume that you have budget to run this campaigns so maybe its really better if you run both of campaigns since for sure you will covered up all the areas of this forum and maximize your presence for doing that.

Also hire a reputable campaign manager to get good advice regarding on this discussion since their expertise can help you to expand your brand here.

It depends on your budget. Actually, both types of campaigns can be good as long as they are managed well. I recommend hiring a reputable campaign manager, even if they charge a higher fee compared to typical campaign managers. This way, you can ensure great results.

In my opinion, signature campaigns that pay in Bitcoin can be very effective. You can find more active members who contribute to the forum, rather than bots who just post for the sake of earning money. To make your job easier, look for the best campaign manager available.

If you're looking for a campaign manager, I suggest posting in the services section. Typically, the best ones have lots of recommendations and feedback from forum members.

Bounty campaign and Signature campaign both have different significant i think, if you want to promote your project in social media especially twitter then of course i will recommend bounty campaign, although here so much spam and bot users. On the other hand, Signature is very popular in this forum, when you will launch a BTC payment signature campaign and selected quality members then your project got good promotion i think.

Have you seen the current state of the bounty program on the forum? there are too many newbie - members there, and after some time ago I checked, there are lots of accounts that are connected to one another, which means they are just taking advantage of the opportunity. I'm still in my opinion that the bounty program is no longer relevant here, it's better to use another platform. But for signature campaigns, it's still relevant and effective.

Yeah. Back around 2017 and 2020 when I attempted to join one bounty, it was just like a hit and miss kind of stuff. You never know if your 3-month work would be worth it in the end. When ICO became like a hot topic, it was just like being visited slowly by scammers until nobody even dared to do ICO bounties anymore.

Not sure if airdrops is like considered to be "bounty campaign" since back then, they were like separate stuff but to this day, I heard that there were still some airdrops worth doing, but the risk is just getting shitcoin into your wallet.

Although to be fair, the way that bounties work back then were still effective, not sure if they still do Twitter, Facebook, Reddit bounties, but with that campaign, you have plenty of audience that could open their ears and eyes for your project depending if your project is worth visiting.

First of all, they are both bounty campaigns. Singature campaign will give you visibility in here. If you do campaigns anywhere else, i want to suggest that don't push people retweeting, or writing their own spammy tweets about it. And spamming in the telegram is a sure way for me not to get interested. Fake onversations that are transparent ads are annoying as well.

You can just use requirements like changing a profile pic and background pic and some link to description etc. Less invasive is more appealing form of advertisement.