Topic: Which corrupt moderator deleted our last posts? calling you out in public NOW! (Read 754 times)

Lol thanks for the fun guys.

So it seems now you can come to a thread, ADMIT NOT READING THE OP and then just try to derail an spout your low functioning spew everywhere.

The reader should note the new excuses for not being able to rebut or refute the central points we are making.  We can't be bothered to read it,  LOL

Reporting all of these self confessed derailing and off topic replies. If they are not deleted we will go to other threads and post very similar things on their threads and see if they get deleted there. This is going to be a fun experiment.

No one of normal intelligence on these boards reads or cares about any of your walls of garbage, especially me.
The only reason I landed here is I was bored, saw your thread title in meta, and clicked here, hoping to read clever snarky responses to your drivel.
You're welcome for the thread view, 30 seconds of my attention and reply, and your resulting heroin high.

Cliff notes for the OP:

   #  Word                  Count 
   1. post                     15 
   2. dt                       10 
   3. debate                   10 
   4. corrupt                   9 
   5. topic                     8 
   6. one                       6 
   7. us                        6 
   8. opinion                   6 
   9. board                     6 
  10. undeniable                6 
  11. moronbozo                 6 
  12. word                      5 
  13. instance                  5 
  14. like                      5 
  15. mods                      5 
  16. financial                 5 
  17. trust                     5 
  18. scammer                   5 
  19. troll                     5 
  20. allowed                   5 
  21. want                      5 
  22. member                    4 
  23. observable                4 
  24. relevant                  4 
  25. reasonable                4 

All cryptohunter's posts in this thread:

   #  Word                  Count 
   1. post                     24 
   2. dt                       22 
   3. trust                    19 
   4. merit                    16 
   5. deleted                  14 
   6. theymos                  14 
   7. system                   14 
   8. like                     13 
   9. member                   13 
  10. instance                 13 
  11. debate                   13 
  12. scammer                  12 
  13. corrupt                  12 
  14. abuse                    11 
  15. want                     10 
  16. need                     10 
  17. financially              10 
  18. one                       9 
  19. motivated                 9 
  20. topic                     9 
  21. observable                9 
  22. even                      8 
  23. point                     8 
  24. undeniable                8 
  25. board                     8 

(as originally posted - edits not counted)

In order to refute and rebut one would have to take the time to read your manifesto.  Ain't nobody got time for that.

The reader should note the last posters DONT DARE address the central point. There is NO attempt to refute or make any rebuttal at all. hehe

Typical low functioning dregs who know they will be torn to pieces in a debate, side tracking and making groundless accusations. Won't work.

Just noise, will be reporting all posts and noting which are NOT deleted. Then We shall replicate the same actions on other threads over and over and if they get deleted we will be adding them as examples to this thread. It's going to be great

Who the fuck is doomad?  where is the conspiracy you retarded ass licking dreg? it is clear there is no reason those posts were deleted and the other 2 remain. It in undeniable not a conspiracy you fucking dumb shit. haha  ANOTHER CHIPMIXER SPAMMER.

Can you not see how foolish you all look. AVOIDING the central point and trying to sidetrack and derail with your low functioning garbage?

Well done idiots keep going the bumps are always welcome.

Why PM the mods, let these corrupt fucking cowards be transparent. Sitting there slapping merit on posts that should be deleted.

It is fun to keep bringing it up and we will continue to do so.

CHIPMIXER CHIPMIXER CHIPMIXER - fuck meta board is the most concentrated form of CHIPMIXER spamming false allegations and scam supporters - this will require some investigation.

Does CHIPMIXER like to be known for sponsoring scammer supporters, those that make false allegations, trolls, mostly imbeciles, ... actually CHIPMIXER is starting get rather annoying.

Perhaps time to start with them and investigate why such a high high proportion of DIRTY TURDS and their SUPPORTERS are wearing CHIPMIXER banners?

Dire posting boy  we notice is also some kind of low level peasant fleecer , loaning his micro btc out to the super poor and desperate for extortionate interest. What a scum bag LOL

Now back on topic dirt bags. Challenge the central point, bring your argument so we can crush you in public as we always do, or fuck off.

Yeah true, especially if they love using at least 5,000 characters per post and vividly describe 'observable instances of corrupt actions'.

That's not a viable option for those who like to make a scene, though.  

It's only a good conspiracy if you can scream it from the rooftops and hope that some gullible passers-by will believe it.

Why do you keep creating new topics about post deletions? PM the (head) mods if you want to know and stop poluting server disk space.

If you want to make your point heard, why not at least post your thread in a simple and easily digestible manner?

Nobody is realistically going to read that essay.

You didn't even put a TL;DR

 Blacklisting him from DT1 did what exactly? NOTHING it changes NOTHING. He is still on DT2 and according to robovac he is more entrenched in DT with more robust powers to trust abuse than when he was on DT1.

Theymos appears to be gradually catching on. I mean the new flagging system is certain an indication he is NOT complicit with the observably scamming and untrustworthy DT's on the Dirty Turds poll.

On the other hand it was CLEARLY explained to him that merit and trust were already fragile and wide open to gaming and to keep them separated as much as possible (although that only makes it slightly harder for a single group to cease control of both control systems. What does he do?? ties the FIRMLY together so that merit = trust. This seems an unthinkable move and indicated either pure foolish trust in humans NOT to be corrupted by financial gain who he seems to believe will do the fair and correct thing even when that would cost them financially ...and he made them accountable only too...... EACH OTHER. LOL

I mean surely even one so "hopeful" as Theymos can not miss the FACT that a huge proportion of DT1 all feature in each others top 20 fans and recipients ... in fact they are LOADED UP with each others merit gifts to each other.  

If he could someone write that off as well..." they are all the best posters in each others minds" simple as that.

He would then have to double down on that foolishness to miss the FACT that huge proportions of DT1 have OBSERVABLE AND CLEAR INSTANCES OF FINANCIALLY MOTIVATED WRONG DOING in some cases clear scamming. AND YET these are all the most TRUSTWORTHY MEMBERS in each others minds apparently?? LOL

He would then have to super double down not to notice how the same groups of people support FLAGRANT TRUST ABUSE on members that have ZERO INSTANCES of financially motivated wrong doing and in some cases are the members that fought these proven scammers on DT1 and pushed for a 2 000 000 000 USD air drop as compensation.

He would then need have huge chunks of his brain removed to not NOTICE these same group are mostly dominating the HIGHEST PAYING SIG CAMPAIGNS that their fellow DT pals are in control of as scampaign managers.

He would then need the remaining parts of his mind to be destroyed to not accept that the moderators here will mark AS BAD a report of a post that just blurts out " who made this cunt bleed" " ignore this used tampon" " other sexual deviance that brings not argument nor attempt to debate the OP in anyway"  

Then DELETE on topic and relevant posts that corroborate their specific points with observable events that those posting this kind of low level insults report LOL



We do not believe Theymos is at that  sub human perhaps even sub TmaN level of stupidity.

So if he is not stupid and not complicit with these DT members stripping the board of free speech and its rev streams then what is WRONG with Theymos??  why tolerate members being trust abused, why tolerate all this obvious gaming and scamming, why tie merit and trust, why make idiots like tman and other scum bags merit sources??

We speculate the answer is when you spend a lot of time and effort creating experimental systems you want to wait before scrapping them as damaging garbage because that is like admitting a waste of time and effort. ALSO in his favor the systems SHOULD become more ROBUST against this systematic abuse and profiteering from this abuse as they organically grow. SHOULD but we say it will take forever and then break down in to abusing FACTIONS that will abuse everyone except opposing factions. So you will have various groups of DT spring up over time that will group together and be forced into an understanding we are free to abuse all others except factions that can create a MAD situation.

You will notice Theymos does not debate well when discussing this situation. It is a one liner here and there usually something that is quite easy to debunk using observable instances and you will find you thread deleted if you ASK too directly about anything too specific and personal.  He claimed cryptohunter (who "may" have a case for being pissed at getting trust abused for whistleblowing on a proven scammer who was randomly attacking cryptohunter at the time, only to find when he voiced a complaint that 2 of the scammers KNOW ASSOCIATES doubled down on the trust abuse and ADMITTED IN BLACK AND WHITE he gave the scam tag because cryptohunter presented observable instances about his scamming pal.) LOL may have a case for being upset. This is the total reverse of what the trust system is FOR RIGHT? you dont have scammers giving scam tags to people that demonstrate they are scammers LOL

However because cryptohunter did not say "the lovely person lauda has trust abused me" but said this scamming piece of fucking dirt lauda has trust abused me I want this croatian scamming shit stain. Then that means you are CRAZY AND INSANE . Also apparently cryptohunter (according to theymos) started spreading LIES??  when asked in a thread to present the lies THE THREAD VANISHED??

So what can we take from this. Theymos we believe does not bother looking deeply into the history of members here at all. He simply believes what excellent members like suchmoon says, also probably does not take kindly to his systems being called a bunch of crap. (the new flagging system is not crap it is excellent but again, weak implementation leaving the old system there in place and grandfathering in ITS ABUSE LOL. So you develop eventually an excellent system then hamstring it straight away to appease the abusers.

Theymos does not seem to be worried about a few innocent members being fucked by his babies that the systems of control have shit out. He is thinking let's sweep these TEETHING issues under the rug and it will all sort itself out as it grows and develops. It will self regulate eventually and I can be free of any accountability for the actions of 2M potential scammers and freaks I don't know. Smart move and yes good idea. Who would want the final buck to stop with them as this grows and grows.

DT could work but you need training wheels....

Any DT1 found guilty of financially motivated wrong doing at any time = out entirely  forever all merits send and received deleted.
Any DT1 found guilty of using the trust system to punish people with ZERO instances of financially motivated wrong doing = out entirely forever all merits send and received deleted.
Any merit source giving merit to even 1 post like " who made this cunt bleed" = instantly removed and all merits sent and received deleted.

Like with all babies they need some discipline. Theymos is like that father that watches the increasingly violent and greedy children hitting the other kids and says well I will just keep having more kids then they will all learn that if you hit people you will get hit back one day and things will just sort themselves out and I can watch tv all day.

Actually theymos just keeps handing the violent and greedy kids increasingly larger weapons and meth (merit source powers and tie to trust) and telling himself well i want this all to self regulate as soon as possible this may be the quickest way. I mean I may lose a few innocent kids but let's think of the bigger picture soon I will have no responsibility the natural pecking order will be sorted out and only the toughest will survive. These won't eventually attack each other because they know it is too risky. That's great Theymos but your DT/MS babies however you rotate them will still be a bunch of violent, greedy, net negative bunch of scum bags when they deal with other kids they view as soft targets. You can watch tv ... your offsping will fuck over every other person they get a chance to.

That analogy is not even as bad as things are here, because the most violent greedy and successful manipulators are able to power up who they please including their alts and totally ensure they are accountable and held in check by themselves and pals (who benefit from this system also who will not rock the boat).

Theymos needs to get out of his arm chair, turn off the simpsons and start banning and blacklisting those with UNDENIABLE instances of financially motivated wrong doing and those that seek to put scam tags on those with ZERO instances of financially motivated wrong doing. FOR A START.

Then tackle the prime cancer creation of mert. Then have another few simpsons episodes and see where we are at. No point waiting for the magic fairies to tell the corrupt DT and merit sources to suddenly start allowing those that are not going to be fully supportive and complicit in their racket a place of DT. You will just end up rotating scum bags on DT. Do you rotate your used shit paper? (well pharmacist probably shouldn't answer) no no no you flush that away and get a new roll.



Get rid of that low functioning corrupt sig spamming mod hilarious and co.  That dumb cretin just gave 8 merits to a post that should by the board rules be DELETED.

I am going to post " do not feed the troll"  when ever we  like and especially on his threads. Fucking weasel that he is.

So we think he sees it but thinks it is too much work to fix it and want to see if it will fix itself.

It wont. He only needs to demonstrate to REAL SCAMMERS who ARE REALLY financially dangerous they are out and not coming back. He need to make people realize if you are giving merit for shit you are NOT going to remain merit source and all your sent and received merits will be deleted.

They will all fall in line.

They can try to cover each others asses with excuses, and other bullshit but they can not because the observable instances are there. The only real danger to cover ups are mods themselves like hilarious and co and crying dumb fish who can delete your TRUTHS away. They can really hide the truth that is worrying and should be tackled first.

they will cover up each others asses,Lauda's gang will still exist if theymos wont blacklisted them for good...our efforts of telling the truth would be useless if theymos wont see the real picture..

What are you talking about. Present the specific rules broken and if they ARE broken in this specific case how are those posts I am responding to NOT breaking the rules. These are the exactly the same points being made. There is NO difference at all. Moronbozo is specifically addressing a single person being appropriate or not for DT (in his opinion) and so are we. Actually we are just clarifying his point. You can not ask for clarity and reasons behind a persons post if THEY are deemed on topic and relevant and make an identical point without being off topic and relevant. You can not make an addition (we observe MORE inappropriate DT members) or expansion to an on topic and relevant reply without being deleted?

This is VERY UNCLEAR because we were instructed recently by another DT member that we were derailing by discussing strictly the central point of the OP when the last few pages had wandered off onto other matters. LOL  the rules are ever changing it would seem. You are derailing by sticking firmly and rigidly to the OP if they say so, or you are off topic and irrelevant for responding directly and making an identical point to a recent post that is on topic and relevant (according to DTs and mods) haha

Brilliant system.

They either ALL need to be deleted or NONE need to be deleted.

Therefore ANY posts in that thread that discuss specific members being on DT and their eligibility based on their prior histories or opinions of such SHOULD BE DELETED.

Else this is selective and corrupt moderation. There can be no question of this.

You say therefore the new underlying mechanisms of DT selection and NOT their implications and results are on topic ONLY? whats to discuss. The mechanisms are the mechanisms, the governing rules are the governing rules, if no implications and results are on topic then it is a going to be a very narrow discussion and all predictive and guesswork. You can speculate on the mechanisms implications and results but as it proceeds along (and fails) you can not present the actual outcome and result of the under lying design changes.

Brilliant set of rules that lead to the optimal solution and results. Also very adaptable it would seem to suit DT and merit sources and their mod pals.

Now let's hear your in depth and specific reply with examples so we can see what YOUR OPINION is of the rules regarding being on topic and relevant .... if you will a transparent step by step with examples of how and how not to reply on this specific thread and examples from that thread that fit in and do not fit in with your opinion of breaking or not breaking the "rules".

I believe we mentioned that IF this is outside of the scope of what is up for discussion here then we will accept a delete if these other posts making identical points are also deleted. Not thepharmacists slop since that is clearly off topic and invalid objectively (but not to corrupt mods)

It is said that someone once tried to start a thread that addressed PERMITTED FLOW and generate example scenarios as a definitive and reliable guide. Sadly nobody was able to contribute to such threads so they died off like all the most valuable threads here. Also greatly lacking in merit and appreciation.

Sad really since that would be KEY to creating a fair and optimal environment for this movement. Along with another great thread attempting to define a post of objective value in the context or arriving at the optimal solution or answer.  Only posters of real value make threads such as those though, the status quo proponents don't want any of that transparent objective standards introduced.... fuck that how will they ensure their chipmixer slots then? well they would still have the trust abuse stick to brandish on any that were making too many posts that had REAL MERIT.

You seem to have some insight into the REAL rules on permitted flow when there seems NO definitive guide to permitted flow at all except the reply must be connected directly to the OP. Even that seems to require some drill down and clarity. We await your specific and detailed guide which demonstrates we are in some way clearly breaking these clear rules you have special insight into.

Looking at this entire thread in question there are a LOT of off topic replies like a huge proportion if ours are. Mostly from DT members though so those are probably not up for delete anytime soon.

This is a post about double standards as much as the REAL permitted flow.

Should not the readers optimal and wide understanding of the OP and all directly related matters be key?

WILL BE BUMPING THIS every 12 hours until the cowardly scum bag reporters and cowardly corrupt sig spamming shady moderator who deleted them answers and debates with me on their actions. Stop hiding away because it is not going to be swept under the carpet. We are feeling refreshed and energized after our vacation.

You need to lean to follow the rules, especially in regards to making your posts relevant to the OP of the thread you are posting in, regardless if you are responding to a recent post in the thread.

Speak up cowardly corrupt scum bag. Which of you dirt bag admin deleted our last 4 on topic and relevant posts.

I will debate those deletes with you here in public to demonstrate what a corrupt and bias sig spamming bunch of scum bags we have as mods.
You will have NO reasonable answer for deleting our posts and leaving moronbozo's and thepharmacists there in place. These are no more on topic nor relevant than our own posts, thepharmacists are  off topic and contain zero value. Our posts contain huge value for this board. This is undeniable and we will debate that also with you.

It is VERY SIMPLE.


On the default trust changes thread. This is how it unfolds.


1. Moronbozo appears crying and complaining that someone who " allegedly" has copy and pasted some words allegedly with the motivation only of financial gain should not be allowed on DT and looking to put pressure on those that may have enabled this to happen.

therefore clearly giving his "opinion" on the changes and making claims they should not be there on the above basis. Seems to be saying this person is untrustworthy and untrustworthy people should not be on DT... INTERESTING and confusing coming from him.


2. This is very confusing since we notice Moronbozo has had ZERO issue and never complained about PROVEN scammers like lauda being on DT, never complained about auction scammers like Tman being on DT or cried about Nutildah the willing scam facilitator for 0.3BTC being on DT or those like the forum treasure doxxer like Vod... all of which are also UNDENIABLE trust system abusers. So what is the apparent copying of words with an apparent motive of financial gain got over and above proven scammers and far more dangerous members who he supports for DT? this is a strange post from moronbozo in the context of his other behaviors like including such people on DT perhaps?

We ask for clarity and say clearly this appears to be a clear double standards (as per usual) but still we are asking to understand his reasoning on the post he just made. This is in the readers interest. In our opinion many of his pals and includes (or prior includes) should be changed out of DT on the same basis. That opinion is NOT allowed it seems.


3. Moronbozo does not dare to debate or explain. He simply runs away (likely reporting our post so he need not clarify)we are not as he claims trying to divert from his claim but add extra value to his claim by highlighting there are plenty of other people guilty of far worse that could be due for a change (out ) of DT.  He wants that discussion closed down immediately. Only he is allowed to say who should not be there on the basis of their observable past histories and it seems mods agree. One rule for him, one rule for others.

4. The pharmacist arrives on the scene to make some false allegations that are easily debunked about us talking garbage and some other offtopic crap about us having no friends etc etc ( all which remains there in tact) this mod is really doing great work.

5. We welcome the pharmacist and then ask him to comment on his own default trust placement and if he considers this " alleged" copier of words "allegedly motivated by financial gain (who moronbozo is free to voice opinion over and question and state he is not allowed on DT) is more of less eligible to be changed out of DT than the pharmacist himself based on the UNDENIABLE UNTRUSTWORTHY PRIOR BEHAVIORS such as getting busted sneakily using a sock puppet to racist troll sig spam the board for PROVEN financial gain. Since he was caught red handed when trying to swap from one campaign to a slightly higher paying one.

Our opinion (like moron bozo is allowed to voice) is that these sneaky and PROVEN devious and greedy behaviors are even less DT worthy that the alleged copier of words for alleged financial motivation.


IT IS CLEAR that the boards moderation is corrupt. You are only allowed to give your opinions on who should and should not be on DT if you are part of the gang. Even questioning them or presenting observable instance that undeniably demonstrate their answer is bogus is moderated away by corrupt mods.

If theymos himself deleted these posts then we call him here to debate the logic and reasoning behind deleting our posts and leaving their posts in tact. It is undeniably corrupt and double standards moderation.


Added to this is the fact we have reported that just openly scream " you are a used tampon",  or who started this cunt bleeding, or just random " don't feed the troll" , or other random low level dirt that make zero effort to present their case or supporting argument and they are marked as bad??

This is a disgrace.

The last post we had deleted from suchmoons topic was clearly on topic and relevant and she said it was because we were replying to the topic title and that made us a shit poster?? her topic title was the central point of the OP?

This board is a joke. Undeniable scammers and those that have observable instances of clear and undeniable financially motivated wrong doing are allowed and encouraged to place scam tags on persons accounts that have ZERO instances of financially motivated wrongdoing for daring to mention truths that DT members want to remain forgotten or do not want to be brought to answer in public.

This is undeniable - when you now combine this with such one sided moderation it is basically one big racket since the mods are being paid out by the same scampaigns as the corrupt DT members?? of course they know where their bread is buttered they likely make more from sig spamming there mixing and gambling crap than they make for their corrupt moderation.

We will accept any reasonable debate. For example morons it means bringing a sensible and reasonable argument corroborated with observable instances.... not opinions you pull out of your ass that fall apart under mild scrutiny then you run away.

No more one liner statements - bring your defense so we can shred it in public and demonstrate what a bunch of scum bags this board is facing.

Theymos you are more than welcome to bring your opinion but no more weak sauce observably incorrect nonsense. We want a transparent debate about this crap. You have allowed blatant and flagrant abuse of innocent and honest members for too long. It is not going to be swept under the rug any longer whether by us or our friends or our friends of friend. The truth will be told and presented, as should be the case.

If you can demonstrate any flaws in our argument and debunk our central point we will gladly move along. Until then don't expect us to suffer in silence. Trust abusers will be called out, scammers will be called out, corrupt mods will be called out, the broken systems that permit and REWARD it will be called out.

We want to help find a solution. It is not sweeping it under the rug and letting things go from bad to worse.

The issue with people here in meta, They will not debate , they will just keep screaming troll, insane, or run away or just call their corrupt mod pals and fellow mixing and gambling spammers to delete your  posts. When you debunk their faux argument they present they will redefine words to the " opposite meanings". This is meta board is one massive troll.

Let's see what happens. We are guessing no reasonable debate, no logic, reason or critical analysis............just a lot of screaming troll or deleting our posts or weaponizing some other gamed metric to seek to silence us via ban or whatever. Cowards and low functioning greedy dregs. You can not delete us, each time we will just return and each time we will just simply post on topic and relevant replies that contain the observable instances of your double standards and trust abuse.

Start to understand there is no sweeping this abuse and double standards shit under the carpet any longer.  We want a full and open debate on this and a resolution. Are you starting to get the idea yet?

Let's start the debate bring the moderator here and the reporters so we can all have a full understanding on what ensures deletion what ensures your post will remain there in tact. Perhaps the mods are not corrupt? perhaps they are just thick as shit? that is equally as concerning though we feel. Can't wait to expose the double standards.

Keep clearly in mind that our central point on any of these serious issues has NEVER been debunked or there been any sensible attempt at a rebuttal. Just a lot of screaming troll, give them a scam tag, defamer, etc etc.  

Time for the real debate on all of this systemic corruption and double standards. Bring your best scumbags to create their best specious arguments for us to crush to pulp.

Numerous posts we report that are just one liner insults with no supporting argument or ...well anything other than. " you are a used tampon" , " who made this cunt start bleeding again"  this type of thing we report and.... IT IS MARKED BAD. Yep no bias here in the moderation at all.

Even this kind of post

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.52360664

just wild accusations, no supporting argument, no attempt at a rebuttal of the central points??

So now WE and EVERYONE ELSE can just plaster this pic in threads to anything they don't agree with. Get slapping it on every thread because it is obviously allowed.

They MAY delete posts of non gang related members because that does not rock their sig campaign slots in anyway or get them on the WRONG SIDE OF THEM.  If you don't know who THEM are you must not get on the wrong side of just ask LFC bitcoin or vod. They have openly cowered away from upsetting "the gang".

We guess it was suchmoon, moronbozo or the smarmacist who reported it, and hilarious who deleted them ....let's wait and see.