Topic: Which dev do you trusted more ? - page 2. (Read 1963 times)
I don't trust any dev. Most devs are here to sell you promises and earn money from you. Even Satoshi disappeared as he knows that he can't show himself to the public as the pressure will be too big from everyone.
WBB dev (1ex dev) 110%
I agree Noobtrader. Do your homework before buying into coin projects.
Obviously the poll wording is biased.
As for the part of this poll that actually deserves merit and discussion, I think a Dev with a known real life identity is overall better than one who is anon. The only downsides are really for the dev themselves.
There are many downsides of an anon dev. Ill use Monero as an example (to add fuel to the fire lol). When a scam dev starts a coin then there is a community takeover, how do we know if the new devs are not just some of the same people as the old devs if they are using anon identities? They would have the most knowledge and provide for an easy to transition of coin control for the dev.
Now I don't think they are the same people in the case of Monero, but surely this situation has played out in the past. It just makes too much sense.
There are many other reasons (that people smarter than myself can figure out) but having a real life identity attached to a core developer seems like the best possible scenario.
As for the part of this poll that actually deserves merit and discussion, I think a Dev with a known real life identity is overall better than one who is anon. The only downsides are really for the dev themselves.
There are many downsides of an anon dev. Ill use Monero as an example (to add fuel to the fire lol). When a scam dev starts a coin then there is a community takeover, how do we know if the new devs are not just some of the same people as the old devs if they are using anon identities? They would have the most knowledge and provide for an easy to transition of coin control for the dev.
Now I don't think they are the same people in the case of Monero, but surely this situation has played out in the past. It just makes too much sense.
There are many other reasons (that people smarter than myself can figure out) but having a real life identity attached to a core developer seems like the best possible scenario.
off course its not biased, it was just coincidental that XMR being no.4.
and yes i think as investor, it would be better to get more info such as who is the lead dev, what is their capability etc as a coin will only be as good as the dev. also if the coin has a good funding mechanism to pay dev.
Obviously the poll wording is biased.
As for the part of this poll that actually deserves merit and discussion, I think a Dev with a known real life identity is overall better than one who is anon. The only downsides are really for the dev themselves.
There are many downsides of an anon dev. Ill use Monero as an example (to add fuel to the fire lol). When a scam dev starts a coin then there is a community takeover, how do we know if the new devs are not just some of the same people as the old devs if they are using anon identities? They would have the most knowledge and provide for an easy to transition of coin control for the dev.
Now I don't think they are the same people in the case of Monero, but surely this situation has played out in the past. It just makes too much sense.
There are many other reasons (that people smarter than myself can figure out) but having a real life identity attached to a core developer seems like the best possible scenario.
As for the part of this poll that actually deserves merit and discussion, I think a Dev with a known real life identity is overall better than one who is anon. The only downsides are really for the dev themselves.
There are many downsides of an anon dev. Ill use Monero as an example (to add fuel to the fire lol). When a scam dev starts a coin then there is a community takeover, how do we know if the new devs are not just some of the same people as the old devs if they are using anon identities? They would have the most knowledge and provide for an easy to transition of coin control for the dev.
Now I don't think they are the same people in the case of Monero, but surely this situation has played out in the past. It just makes too much sense.
There are many other reasons (that people smarter than myself can figure out) but having a real life identity attached to a core developer seems like the best possible scenario.
i'd trust a coin which has a group of commited devs regardless of anon or not.
like monero ;-)
like monero ;-)
I can't vote and wouldn't even if I could. I don't really trust any devs. Even Bitcoins. Why? Too afraid to update and improve the coin.
Because it makes no sense like this.... i will trust the dev more that get´s shit done... no matter if known or unknown.
Also option 4 is wrong... with ur example.... fluffypony is not unknown...
Also option 4 is wrong... with ur example.... fluffypony is not unknown...
i never wrote unknown, i write anon...
btw if fluffypony is not anon, im very sorry that i make mistake, but are you sure he/she is not anon ?
Option 4 
i dont understand why yu laughing
do i make mistake describing it ? Troll polls like this are exactly why I dumped Dash.
I'm glad to finally be out.
I'm glad to finally be out.
pls point to me the exact mistake that i make, i will lock this poll if i make mistake and make another poll.
thank you
EDIT : i change the poll option.
Troll polls like this are exactly why I dumped Dash.
I'm glad to finally be out.
I'm glad to finally be out.
Because it makes no sense like this.... i will trust the dev more that get´s shit done... no matter if known or unknown.
Also option 4 is wrong... with ur example.... fluffypony is not unknown...
Also option 4 is wrong... with ur example.... fluffypony is not unknown...
Option 4
And yet you wonder why you get constantly trolled.... Kindergarten....
do i make mistake ? is there some misstatement in the poll option
pls let me know, thanks
And yet you wonder why you get constantly trolled.... Kindergarten....
Jump to: