Topic: Which do you prefer anonymous developer/creator or well revealed person? - page 2. (Read 665 times)
July 21, 2018, 02:04:36 PM
I will never invest in a project that I don't know the developers, it is too risky, most people sometimes refer to Bitcoin, but then BTC has no value all you need is just a PC to mine and one has nothing to lose, but now we see project collecting millions and disappearing with the fund, who are you going to pick if the developer is anonymous
July 21, 2018, 01:27:39 PM
In the ICO projects, all the developers of the companies must be disclosed, so I would also not risk and invest in a project that would have hidden the developers. Do I find such ICO very doubtful?
July 02, 2018, 04:22:04 PM
Lots of ICO are conducting KYC why to know the identity of the investors. But lets reverse it this way on 2 biggest Crypto Bitcoin and Etherium. Bitcoin founder is Satoshi Nakamoto while Ethereum is Vitalik Buterin between these 2, Etherium's creator revealed himself in public and roaming around the globe to raise awareness of his project to community while bitcoins`s founder still remain anonymously but his project dominate`s the market. Wow very hard to choose right?
Many people still fond of bitcoin but they don't know who actually create it. Mean what's were patronizing here is the product and not the person behind it. Logical but that's the fact. Its impossible no one knew who actually made it cause he didn't do it alone.
Now answering my title question on my opinion, I prefer the revealed creator rather than the anonymous guy even though they both have amazing product. Why? cause this will be in history and you don't want to recognize a screen name when that person make an enourmous advancement in technology.
Many people still fond of bitcoin but they don't know who actually create it. Mean what's were patronizing here is the product and not the person behind it. Logical but that's the fact. Its impossible no one knew who actually made it cause he didn't do it alone.
Now answering my title question on my opinion, I prefer the revealed creator rather than the anonymous guy even though they both have amazing product. Why? cause this will be in history and you don't want to recognize a screen name when that person make an enourmous advancement in technology.
bitcoin created by anonymous person, and this is the best part of bitcoin, why ?
and i think because of that, all decision on bitcoin is fully democracy my friend
but, in this day i think it will be better if a coins created by a well revealed person, to reduce the fraud activity
For now on current projects it is normal for us investors to seek out transparency on the team behind the project.On all scams that do exist on the market we would definitely seek out transparency which somehow give us some confidence on investing.
June 09, 2018, 03:15:28 AM
Bitcoin does not need his leader, he has made a name on another. But the rest of the coins live only at the expense of the team and the leader who must correctly understand when and in what direction it is necessary to carry out development and which sides to intensify.
June 08, 2018, 03:28:48 PM
Lots of ICO are conducting KYC why to know the identity of the investors. But lets reverse it this way on 2 biggest Crypto Bitcoin and Etherium. Bitcoin founder is Satoshi Nakamoto while Ethereum is Vitalik Buterin between these 2, Etherium's creator revealed himself in public and roaming around the globe to raise awareness of his project to community while bitcoins`s founder still remain anonymously but his project dominate`s the market. Wow very hard to choose right?
Many people still fond of bitcoin but they don't know who actually create it. Mean what's were patronizing here is the product and not the person behind it. Logical but that's the fact. Its impossible no one knew who actually made it cause he didn't do it alone.
Now answering my title question on my opinion, I prefer the revealed creator rather than the anonymous guy even though they both have amazing product. Why? cause this will be in history and you don't want to recognize a screen name when that person make an enourmous advancement in technology.
Many people still fond of bitcoin but they don't know who actually create it. Mean what's were patronizing here is the product and not the person behind it. Logical but that's the fact. Its impossible no one knew who actually made it cause he didn't do it alone.
Now answering my title question on my opinion, I prefer the revealed creator rather than the anonymous guy even though they both have amazing product. Why? cause this will be in history and you don't want to recognize a screen name when that person make an enourmous advancement in technology.
bitcoin created by anonymous person, and this is the best part of bitcoin, why ?
and i think because of that, all decision on bitcoin is fully democracy my friend
but, in this day i think it will be better if a coins created by a well revealed person, to reduce the fraud activity
June 08, 2018, 12:13:43 PM
I obviously prefer a well revealed person as opposed to anonymous developer. Nowadays so many scams are taking place in crypto market that I have personally seen people losing money. Under such conditions I can’t risk my hard earned money to a anonymous developer. I will not even consider the coin if the full-fledged details of the developing team is not revealed.
June 02, 2018, 02:59:03 PM
I obviously prefer a well revealed person as opposed to anonymous developer. Nowadays so many scams are taking place in crypto market that I have personally seen people losing money. Under such conditions I can’t risk my hard earned money to a anonymous developer. I will not even consider the coin if the full-fledged details of the developing team is not revealed.
June 01, 2018, 09:07:44 AM
I'd rather anonymous as long as the project is open source. I can't stand the cult of personality that is currently being built around some crypto figures - Buterin this, Sasha that, Ver those... gawd!
June 01, 2018, 08:04:35 AM
With all the scammers in the crypto world it's never worth risking in an anonymous project. With still no regulations and a way to get your money back in case of fraud it's not wise to invest anything in a project whith anonymous team. Also when the team is well known you could decide for yourself if the people behing an ICO have enough expirience in the field an thus have faith in them and invest your money with them.
June 01, 2018, 07:37:42 AM
Lots of ICO are conducting KYC why to know the identity of the investors. But lets reverse it this way on 2 biggest Crypto Bitcoin and Etherium. Bitcoin founder is Satoshi Nakamoto while Ethereum is Vitalik Buterin between these 2, Etherium's creator revealed himself in public and roaming around the globe to raise awareness of his project to community while bitcoins`s founder still remain anonymously but his project dominate`s the market. Wow very hard to choose right?
Many people still fond of bitcoin but they don't know who actually create it. Mean what's were patronizing here is the product and not the person behind it. Logical but that's the fact. Its impossible no one knew who actually made it cause he didn't do it alone.
Now answering my title question on my opinion, I prefer the revealed creator rather than the anonymous guy even though they both have amazing product. Why? cause this will be in history and you don't want to recognize a screen name when that person make an enourmous advancement in technology.
Many people still fond of bitcoin but they don't know who actually create it. Mean what's were patronizing here is the product and not the person behind it. Logical but that's the fact. Its impossible no one knew who actually made it cause he didn't do it alone.
Now answering my title question on my opinion, I prefer the revealed creator rather than the anonymous guy even though they both have amazing product. Why? cause this will be in history and you don't want to recognize a screen name when that person make an enourmous advancement in technology.
Well i think that in order for a coin to be considered decentralized anonymity of the founders is essential. That being said bitcoin is probably the only coin where this has worked primarily because it was the first coin/ essentially created and made the crypto market. In todays' market however which is littered with scams and frauds, having a known founder that i can talk to and meet and actually verify gives some bit of security ( albeit still not enough). Accountability is critical and it is good to know that you can chase after them in case they try and defraud you.
May 09, 2018, 03:23:44 PM
I found a coin in the market called (btw) Bitwhite, the team behind the project is annonymous and wearing a mask, but this project has a big community, and as i do a research they are actually following their roadmap, this team is interesting here is the coin info.
https://bitwhite.org
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitwhite
https://bitwhite.org
https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitwhite
Your right they are anonymous. Been following them also since day 1, not all project if their dev team is on anonymous mode that doesn't mean there is something going on.
May 06, 2018, 04:08:47 PM
You can't compare bitcoin with ethereum because bitcoin was the original and first to market so it will always be king. There are many scams these days so having a founder that is known to the public will increase confidence in the project.
I don’t think so that it will be justified to make a comparison of bitcoin with any other coin because bitcoin is the real backbone of the entire crypto market and that there can be no other coin which can compete with it in anyway. ETH is no doubt a very good coin but it is good at its own place and that it has nothing to do with the market value or the market cap of bitcoin. 
May 06, 2018, 12:16:51 PM
I do not care about the identity of the creator of technology. I care about the technology itself, if it is open and decentralized and does not depend on its creator, then it can be used. If this dependence remains and it is very strong, then this technology is bad regardless of who created it anonymous or public person.
May 06, 2018, 12:08:54 PM
I prefer well known people for sure! because you can be sure that the ico is not scam, also probably coin will perform well in the market, also those ICOs usually reach their hard cap.
May 06, 2018, 11:54:17 AM
I still prefer revealed people behind the project as you have to gain trust of the people.
Big investors are going to doubt hard on something with anonymous teams as they should be the people playing with calculated risks. And one of the things I think they will be looking at is the legitimacy of the people working behind the project.
Big investors are going to doubt hard on something with anonymous teams as they should be the people playing with calculated risks. And one of the things I think they will be looking at is the legitimacy of the people working behind the project.
May 06, 2018, 08:07:50 AM
I personally prefer real identities and regular communication from the team, they days of fake details and anonymous teams have gone, tranparency is very important for new projects.
May 06, 2018, 07:49:16 AM
Market anymore fovors well revealed people because they actually don't create coins like bitcoin so their creators don't need to disappear to make it more decentralized. It is also not possible much as they start with a ico.
May 06, 2018, 07:26:28 AM
I think it does not matter who created bitkoyn. With all due respect to Vitalik Buterin, he is probably not the only one who created ETHEREUM. it doesn't matter who the developer is. the main thing is that the technology itself and cryptocurrency attracted people
May 06, 2018, 05:36:13 AM
bitcoin is the first cryptocurrency and everyone does not care who the Creator of many just want to earn.I distrust projects in which there are no names or faces, the creators, have to be careful with such projects
Most of the ICO’s has their own details about the team behind the project and I think it can be a big factor for them since investors wants to protect their capital and seeing a great team behind it, can help them decide. When you are investing its good to know the background of the team so you can be confident say that you are with the great team.
May 06, 2018, 05:27:58 AM
I think it's better to say that the creators are better, so that we can have a reliable basis for reinvesting. Anonymous development is exploited by many fake projects and eventually becomes a hoax.
Jump to: