Topic: WHICH flags are appropriate for each scenario listed here??????????????????????? (Read 1258 times)

Cryptohunter do you actually have any friends IRL? I bet not, no one could really put up with this singleminded narcissistic attitude, fuck I bet even your parents dislike you. Now move on continue wasting internet space with these longwinded pointless repetitive quotes.

Pajeets gonna pajeet

I think you have gathered enough information how to set up your flags in the last 9 days so either set them up or lock the thread, it seems you are moving this topic to different direction (meritcycle, FJ...)

---

May I remind you that I am still waiting for answers to something which you started, if you don't mind to respond in that thread.

Talking about yourself again ?

---

Thanks for clearing this up for me. Now we are all well informed of the conspiracy going around for years. 
Aren't you tired of saying the same stuff again and again ...? I heard it first from this current alt-account of yours a few months ago.

Seriously, I don't feel nor think I am the one to blame here.
Good luck to you in your life. You must be very sad.

Ping me on Telegram if you want to chat. No hate.

No the collusion is clear.


1. merits cycled between THE SAME handful of individuals
2. THE SAME individuals include each other on DT
3. THE SAME individuals exclude almost the same people on DT
4. yogg, lauda, tman, owlcatz, hhampuz, and other shit stains all trust abusing as a group
5. ALL seem to be part of 2 or 3 of THE SAME sig campaigns

To deny there is clear indication of a colluding group here is ludicrous and only someone as low functioning as you or perhaps even a low life form like Tman could be led to believe your garbage.

The rest of your post is as laughable as your claim there is no collusion. I mean it is pure fantasy and the spew of a desperate and retarded fool, you have no clue of what we have been able or unable to achieve, those claims look desperate and foolish.

Hope that cleared that up for you, and any other person that wishes to look into it for themselves mr scammer supporter yogg of bitcointalk, you trust abusing feltching puppet.

Instead of telling administrators what they need to do, why won't you start your own forum ?
You will be able do whatever you want there.

We have been doing business on this forum for years with eachother, and you call that a collusion because we got to know each other, became friends and used to trade ?

There is no collusion, and you really have much imagination.
You seem very unstable, and completely unable to achieve some consistency.

Aren't you jealous ? Unable to access it, then he destroys it ? Is it what "The One Above All" is about ?  

Start taking your meds again and get a life.

Thanks for bumping this thread moron.

You have served multiple purposes here.

1. Demonstrating that merit is often given the observably incorrect and bogus crap and is mostly just a political tool used by "merit sources/ DT members " to entrench each other in power, and use that power to collude and ensure the best sig spots and other financial rev streams go to them.

2. The far superior posts that make solid and valuable points (crushing beyond any doubt bogus and specious weak arguments) are starved of merit if they do not support the system controllers agenda.

3. That merit sources should not be the lowest form of sub human intelligence on the board like TMAN. A miscreant so devoid of any useful qualities even confessed he had never made a post he could present that demonstrated it was worthy of merit other than some swearing or other moronic behavior that his "pals" feel qualify as entertaining at a gutter level.

4. Bumping the thread that clearly shows that you and your pal lauda are clearly dirt bags that should be the ones wearing huge warning banners.


thanks Tman , now please some more "poetry" if you have some time.

What you doing today Tman? getting your pals to auction your stuff whilst you pretend its not yours and bullshitting people trying to pump the price up?  or phoning peoples parents and trying to extort them?

When did this board get so desperate we need people this stupid and this financially high risk to the board to be our merit sources and positions of " TRUST" lol.

Get them all out. Start with fortunejack's entire sig spamming set of low functioning scum.  Come on Theymos they will never exclude each other, their collusion ensures they keep their top paid sig spots, just get that ban/blacklist hammer out and start beating some scammer ass with it. 


To make this relevant so it is not vanished into the void. We will be questioning  if his own highly probable extortion attempt along with his auction stunt qualify him for a lemons flag along with his scamming mate lauda?

Yet again salty destroys the low functioning pajeet worry posting fucks.

Love you dude

You did see it? Its one of those movies that's really good the first time around, but then after you learn the secret plot twist, there's really no reason to see it again.


Ultimately I know this is the correct solution but I am also intrigued as to why he keeps referring to himself as "we."



I... The Royal We... You know, the editorial.

Typical low function dregs replies. Get destroyed and made to look like scam supporting shit stains who will say or claim they believe even the most far fetched irrelevant garbage that they demonstrated they did not really believe in 5 mins ago ... LOL

So now start worrying about other irrelevant things like who "we" are as if that makes any difference to the observable instances presented.

Now STFU unless you have anything relevant to say that can redeem the duplicitous obviously sneaky and pathetic idiot SS, who just posted in the most embarrassing example of an obvious gang sig spammer trying to form some kind of defense for an undeniable lying and scamming shit stain like lauda who it obviously colludes with. To read it over again is a pleasure.  It actually more fun than the snitchmoon self debunking examples. At least she does not try to move the goal posts around as much or redefine words to their opposite meanings LOL.

LOL it is funny notildah turns up to add some stupid comments. I mean perhaps SS thought to study the nutildahs guide to changing ones opinion to suit their agenda at the time.  Account selling is facilitating scamming and they are evil and deserve red trust...then actually I will sell my account for 0.3btc  LOL... then announce it was not sold and it never happened. Should have just said redefined "evil" to "good" and "scam facilitating" to "scam inhibiting" and deserves "red trust" to deserves "to be on DT" then all is good. LOL ask SS works great. Then tell everyone anyone who did not know that is an idiot  haahah

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.50719875

Have fun scum bags.

^I hope you don't think there is a movie I didn't saw?

Maybe better when the one-above-sh*t opens a thread, it can be turned into a movie one

Not a bad idea...

Or as SaltySpitoon said, you are always right and just end it

Have you ever seen that movie Identity? I think its more like that.



Though the movie Psycho also explains the situation but has a more apt title.

Who is "we" ? Is this crips v bloods ?

Amazing, we both think each other are idiots. Glad we had this heart to heart.

Sorry I hadn't noticed you had replied again.

We asked because we were curious. You have demonstrated clearly you are a gang supporter with a fragile mind.

Every element of your argument was destroyed, until you had to redefine words to try to cling on to some desperate defense. You look foolish. You demonstrated that your final redefinition of instamine is NOT EVEN YOUR TRUE OPINION (not that anyone else would have thought to redefine instamine to the OPPOSITE of what instamine means ... the left to what is really right).

Not that that is not silly and desperate enough, but YOUR first claim was : that people CAN ESTABLISH if there has been an instamine by looking at the block explorer (clearly you know intention is not part of what defines instamine) Makes you now just look dishonest and desperate. I mean does the block explorer tell if you if it was INTENTIONAL?   LOL i mean each point of your argument was crushed step by step, but now your final desperate attempt to redefine Instamine demostrates you don't even believe what you are claiming, just will bullshit readers to fit the gangs agenda. You are bogus.  I mean intent is IRRELEVENT as you KNOW.

Another good thing about this thread is although your entire specious and ever changing garbage defense of laudas clear lying and scamming is crushed and demonstrates your final "opposite of instamine" redefinition is not something you REALLY believe (even though it is irrelevant). So you outed yourself as a desperate protector of scammers and liars.

That the merit given to your "clinging to your own observably bogus dishonest defense" that you now say instamine CANNOT be determined by block explorer but you NEED TO KNOW THE REAL INTENTION lol  (so you can't have it both ways). Total shit post is given 10 merits by laudas dumb as poets ass feltcher and fellow FORTUNEJACK  sig spammer (like SS AND LAUDA) for presenting the worst defense even made on bitcointalk.

Merit system is bogus, DT members are bogus. Your opinions are highly suspect and observably foolish.

We will not be asking your opinion again since you have clearly demonstrated you are under your paymasters control.

Don't worry pal, scout's honor I won't get involved. I don't dare to offer my opinion, I'm terrified that I'd be wrong and get thrashed again. You are the absolute authority and your judgement is impeccable, why bother asking the opinions of us plebeians?

Not as yet, but I will try to remember to let you know when i do then you can come and oppose it.

The type 1 flag also seems strange some get a yellow some get a red message. The people with red seem to have no scamming behaviors that I can see. Where can I find out what thread is supposed to demonstrate concrete evidence of scamming for each flag. How to even find the flags for the red type 1 flags. I can only see the yellow ones? or perhaps it due to them using a different trust list. I wonder how to view without changing away from default.

Thule i dont think has ever scammed. He is accused of account selling which should be yellow at most right? how to see why he has a red flag? where to click on his account? maybe the flag is no longer active or something. I need to look more into the flags before i start bringing real scammers and those really dangerous to people in financial terms to task.

We need to make sure that we are complying with the rules. We think the new system is a huge step in the right direction so we just need to fully understand it before we put it to work.

You my friend are one handsome stud, I don't feel too bad being bested by someone with as much rich cryptocurrency experience as you. So, anyway have you decided to flag Lauda then?

That red pill is just kicking in. Good, keep taking those when ever you wish to enter into a reasonable debate in future.

If you feel they are losing their effect and you start wishing to redefine words or see those enjoying lemon tea as the same danger financially as those that have proven to scam , have extortion and shady escrow under their belts and blatant trust abuse then just seek our help. We are always here for you.

Even the most ardent dash liars admit it happened because it is undeniable,they just claim it was all one big mistake with subsequent intentional actions that accidentally compounded the first mistake ALWAYS in their favor. Yes that sounds like the sort of thing you would believe within 2 mins of research if it suits your agenda.

Yes deliberately compounding your mistake is not the best way to convince people it was a mistake . That's good you are learning now. Only offering to redress your 2 huge  "mistakes" after months of being pressured and having teams of scammers like lauda telling people it never happened (before deciding not to really redress anything) is again not the best way to convince people. Well, you may convince SS to convince himself via redefining words, if it fits his agenda... but not reasonable people.

I mean asking him to accept that the text book example of an instamine is an instamine is according to SS like asking him to say right is left. I mean he is not just altering the definition of an instamine here he is saying it is the opposite of an instamine LOL
If the devs just claim accident that means it never happened. Simple as that. It is the opposite of an instamine and does not have any of the implications an intentional instamine has. LOL

The more you consider what he is saying the more entertaining it is. Get rid of the spamming fortune jack sig for a start mr ex mod. I find most fortune jack sig wearers to be of the same scamming ilk or supporting them clearly via devious and lemon flavored means.

Good old SS - always game for a laugh.

You have already bested me friend, no need to consider your ruthless onslaught. I read over a good number of the threads, and as you say not a soul shares the same opinion as me. This is a clear and shut case that requires no further discussion, and the tens if not hundreds of threads and thousands of replies are just people all confirming how great it is to be in agreement with one another. You are correct, there is absolutely no one who disagrees causing this to be ambiguous in any way. You are the lord and master of cryptocurrencies as well as the authority on definitions of words created within the last 5 years and defined by a community that doesn't disagree with your assessment in the slightest.

My argument has nary a sympathizer to the fact that hindsight is 20/20 and that attempting to fix a later perceived problem could ever backfire. Your judgement is exactly what every person would do in any situation you see fit.

You are the absolute Authority.

Sorry that makes no more sense. An instamine does NOT NEED TO BE INTENTIONAL I am putting it in bold so that you give it attention. If I make a coin that chucks out half its entire minting in 5 mins by accident, or I do it on purpose it is an instamined coin. If I  fix it so that only I the dev can mine and nobody else can that is still an instamine but it is really a captive instamine. It does not stop being an instamine.

The we need to consider this accident. Most devs who make an ACCIDENT relaunch it to rectify the mistake. Did they relaunch to rectify the mistake? NO they did not. They thought they would MAGNIFY the mistake and slash away 75% of the original minting to MAGNIFY their mistake. Who GAINED BY THIS MISTAKE = THEY DID,  who gained by not restarting it again THEY DID, who gained by slashing the remaining minting THEY DID.... LOL all those accidents whooops...  When they were called on this this over and over and over by a real legend what did they do?? well the developer then said okay I will compensate the miners by giving a 2 000 000 000 dollar (now) air drop. Why well it obvious because no instamine happened. I will just give you 2 000 000 000 usd for no reason.

Now all of that you are willing to suddenly believe in 2 mins of researching LOL  is irrelevant since that huge instamine coin emission took place if it was an accident or NOT.

You are still spewing nonsense. Please see how foolish and desperate you appear now trying to redefine instamine. I guess you can say there is intentional instamine, there is accidental instamine ....the result is still instamine. Get it now?



When people BENEFIT from an accident and they have opportunity to go back and fix the accident but they DO NOT. Then I doubt it was an accident and they are sorry.

When people later change the rules again to benefit MORE from the original accident then I really really really really doubt it was an accident and they are sorry.

When they change the rules again to take another 10% benefits from their loot gained in the accident. Then i would have to be full on crazy to believe it was an accident and they are sorry. You are ready to accept that in 2 mins of research lol ...oh really?

Kind of like me accidentally feeding you lemons after I have taken out life insurance on you. Then to make really sure I accidentally inject lemon juice into your blood stream and increase the life insurance amount further. Then later I bury you in a lemon lined coffin and bury you in the lemon groves on my property and claim the insurance.  Then i just redefine lemons and your name and tell myself none of it ever happened.  When people ask where is SS i tell them it is my opinion you never existed in the form they are trying to force me to accept lol. I don't accept the definition of SS that you are trying to force on me any longer. haha

Seems to me you are always willing to say or believe anything that suits you and the gang of lauda puppets and feltchers.