Topic: Which is better ICO, STO Or IEO ? - page 17. (Read 14116 times)

Previously many ICO companies failed to list in the exchanges but now with the IEO once after completion of their IEO exchange are listing the coin for trading. Previously ICO's will take many months for listing the coin in the exchanges.

You should explore about STOs because these offerings are far better especially the newly launched CTOs are better than all of the offerings. CTOs are better than both IEOs and ICOs no doubt because the Consumer Token Offerings have more benefits than those of the Initial Exchange Offerings (IEOs), Security Token Offerings (STOs) and definitely the unsecure Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs).

To begin with, all offers or instead have same motive and that is to create a medium where the team can raise funds to start development. But they have their similarities, ICO tends to be a better and easy way to generate funds but was plagued with scams, STO makes investors to have a share in the project they are investing while IEO is a better form of ICO but more secure in terms of investors funds. Out of the three, in my own opinion IEO is better.

In my own opinion I think they are all the same thing (that is fundraising campaign). The best amongst depends on the quality of the project that is using it and not merely because of the name. I have seen projects that did IEO, fail and same goes for ICOs and STO too, so the quality of the project they are offering matters a lot too.

In my own opinion, I prefer IEO because of the exchange involved in it. There is no more issue about years of delay before listing on exchanges . Initial exchange offering makes things easy because projects get listed on exchange immediately after the IEO on their launchpad.

as for now IEO looks the most successful way of raising money. ICOs have a lack of trust and STO is a rare event with only few examples.

but the benefits that can be obtained if you invest in STO will not be as high as the profits that you will get at ICO because ICO is a new project with cheap coin prices and potentially up to 100x if the project goes well.

in contrast to projects that only spread their wings surely the increase would not be so significant.
so you have to choose between big risks but big profits or small risks with small profits

i agree STO have lower risk than ICO or IEO because before they start the offering they already have platform or company that have purpose that only want to expand their business

As per info on the internet I heard STO are better because they are more secured than the rest but the most trending one is IEO ,its better version of ICO and it works and we still have good ICO projects as well ,its all in the investors hand ,choose wisely

Initial exchange offering i.e. IEO is an another way to raise funds. Why I said another way? Because we know that ICO has been banned by many countries. So total funds to be raised, projects can not achieve their goals.
Initial Exchange Offering, means a project gets listed on an exchange directly without going through an ICO. We see more of these types of token issuing in countries where ICOs are restricted. Also now a days we are seeing projects coming up with new model called security token offering i.e. STO and seems it's becoming more popular now a days.
To mention here, I came across a project called VELIC, and it has another new fund raising model which is IAO i.e. initial auctions offering. Isnt it interesting?
Regarding which is better from ICO and IEO, from my point of view, IEOs are far better than ICOs. There are many things. First, with IEO, investors are sure about the exchange the coin is listing because this is the first step to start the IEO. With ICOs, even though it's completed, most of the projects lists coin after a certain period, which few investors are not happy with.
With ICO, there is lack of transparency. It is the team who updates the fund raised bar on there website. It is very difficult to know the exact amount of funds raised.
With IEO, responsibility is also with exchanges launching that IEO to build the confidence in existing and new users.

I can see many people around us say IEO is the better option among this but fact if you power to handle the investment. That will be not the better suggestion and it may clear the scam issues but complete power may be exchange side. No one can work independently then.

This crypto space is here to give space for everyone and allow us to stay anonymous. We should not give such power to exchange, so I always love the ICO investment.

Yes they are same just collecting money on different systems. I can't see much success on IEO also. After listed exchange for trading IEO coins dumped hardly. So most of investor's in lose even they hold it. I can't see much project about STO, not sure if I am missing something. But likely all are same.

Yeah I agree, STO is less risky than ICO or IEO, but IEO is most hyped by crypto citizen right now and IEO is one of the fastest ways for the project to raising the funds to run their project and investor can gain their profit faster too...

I think many investors will be smarter while choosing right decision for now. Each way (ICO, IEO, and STO) have an pros and cons each other. But from now IEO was choosed because this way is more interested by many people from than ICO.

well, the IEO immediately trades on an exchanger. of course in this case, people will choose this. however it depends on the project, but now, the IEO takes precedence, because it can be said that among the three systems, IEO has a small risk.

The IEO is a trend of calling for projects' capital. IEO is always an advantage to help the project attract investors and substantial investment through exchanges. I realize that the IEO implementation projects have a high success rate, and most investors are profitable.

actually I don't want to compare which is the most appropriate between ICO, STO and IEO. because everything has the same goal but in a different way. so we as ordinary people can only follow what we think is appropriate and leave if we feel any doubt.

All has it's flaws, ICO is full of scam and fake projects. Many has lost money on ICOs and STO is nothing different from it. IEO is much better but has it's bad side as some exchanges IEOs fail and some that claims to be real, are not

Depends what you mean better ? Better in ROI ? I preffer IEO , but never participated in any currently , depends where project do IEO on Binance or other exchanges . If they do on binance then most of them got pretty good ROI from IEO price currently . Other projects that did IEO on smaller exchanges lost value by half already

We have own opinions about this topic but for me it depends in the quality of the project and its products,so i will not lloking if what fundraising they do as strategies in making funds but the matter is how good the project is to attract investors and to make sure that they will have the profits in the investments they invest.