which is better to burn tokens every year or dividends every year?

MainIbem

sr. member

Activity: 1316

Merit: 379

#SWGT PRE-SALE IS LIVE

Quote from: kidbounty on February 05, 2019, 09:40:21 AM

Hi all ...
which do you think is better for long-term projects, burn tokens or dividends every year?
both of these choices have their own advantages. which one is more reliable to increase prices and keep the ecosystem of tokens on the market?

I want to hear your opinion about these two things.

I have a question about this burning of tokens.

Who monitors the burning process? Is there independent accessors to the burning of tokens?

Jadesola

member

Activity: 280

Merit: 11

With bear market burning token might make little or no difference, I have seen different projects that have burn token yet the price is yet to increase, i think using both method may be better.

dabenko

member

Activity: 280

Merit: 11

Quote from: kidbounty on February 05, 2019, 09:40:21 AM

Hi all ...
which do you think is better for long-term projects, burn tokens or dividends every year?
both of these choices have their own advantages. which one is more reliable to increase prices and keep the ecosystem of tokens on the market?

I want to hear your opinion about these two things.

The crypto market is in a way different from how it used to be, in the sense that, even if there is huge supply of tokens, the price can still rise, if the project has a good product.
So whether there is token burn or dividends on yearly basis, the magnitude of the product of such project is the most important.
If it has good product, accompanied with either token burn or dividends to holders, it will enhance its growth.

Bitbtc8

full member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 116

For me I will go for the burn token projects as they are more effective on the price ,it lowers that max supply and it makes the adoption worthy but actually the coin project must still be a good one actually ,you can't expect a crappy one with burn implementation to surge on price because no one will really have interest to buy ,I guess adoption matters a lot too

Herbert2020

legendary

Activity: 1946

Merit: 1137

Quote from: kidbounty on February 05, 2019, 09:40:21 AM

which one is more reliable to increase prices

none of them.
price only rises under two circumstances: 1. with pumps 2. with adoption.
the pumps are obviously what has been happening to altcoins and tokens but they are not sustainable, eventually the dump comes and prices go back down to initial value and lower than that.

the only way to increase the price is by adoption and for that the coin has to have use cases in the real world otherwise it doesn't matter how much tokens you burn or do whatever else, the coin is doomed to die.

wuvdoll

legendary

Activity: 1442

Merit: 1025

Quote from: kidbounty on February 05, 2019, 09:40:21 AM

which do you think is better for long-term projects, burn tokens or dividends every year?
both of these choices have their own advantages. which one is more reliable to increase prices and keep the ecosystem of tokens on the market?

I'm just curious is to know what are the advantages and what are the major differences between these two options other than obvious things. I mean burning will lead less number of tokens to represent your project whereas dividends will obviously increase the value of your tokens. I'm not sure what are the own advantages of these two methods, you are talking about (it is better to add them up in OP itself).

I do hear corporate are following a method of "splitting" so that they will be having more number of shares but with less value. If you consider this then burning out must be a new thing after the introduction of crypto space. People are keeping weightage to "total market cap" rather than value of one unit. So, burning cannot be a right option.

fudster

sr. member

Activity: 1190

Merit: 255

Quote from: juchin on February 09, 2019, 02:11:29 AM

Quote from: kidbounty on February 05, 2019, 09:40:21 AM

Hi all ...
which do you think is better for long-term projects, burn tokens or dividends every year?
both of these choices have their own advantages. which one is more reliable to increase prices and keep the ecosystem of tokens on the market?

I want to hear your opinion about these two things.

I think burn tokens will be better than dividends every year and it can make the price more and more raise after that

Certainly we got different views on this because to me dividends are much convenient than trying to lessen the circulating supply. It doesn't help when manipulators come it and its inevitable. Look what happen to ICN where they tend to burn tokens, thins never change whereas for distributing dividends, the team has something to lose so they'd have to make the project impressive for investors.

juchin

member

Activity: 290

Merit: 10

Join @Bountycloud for the best bounties!

Quote from: kidbounty on February 05, 2019, 09:40:21 AM

Hi all ...
which do you think is better for long-term projects, burn tokens or dividends every year?
both of these choices have their own advantages. which one is more reliable to increase prices and keep the ecosystem of tokens on the market?

I want to hear your opinion about these two things.

I think burn tokens will be better than dividends every year and it can make the price more and more raise after that

ilcapitano

member

Activity: 462

Merit: 14

Quote from: kidbounty on February 05, 2019, 09:40:21 AM

Hi all ...
which do you think is better for long-term projects, burn tokens or dividends every year?
both of these choices have their own advantages. which one is more reliable to increase prices and keep the ecosystem of tokens on the market?

I want to hear your opinion about these two things.

Tokens is also the dividend of the company when it comes into operation. Income of investors are more guaranteed and so it will be more attractive

kindbtc

member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 12

SAPG Pre-Sale Live on Uniswap!

I would definitely go for dividends and those too preferably every quarter and paid in btc, eth or usd and not in the project's own token as paying dividend in its own token will only cause massive dumps after each dividend so personally i prefer eth dividends and i do not like token burns or buy backs as they produce negligible effect and investors do not feel confident in such a model.

johnthree

newbie

Activity: 112

Merit: 0

Quote from: kidbounty on February 05, 2019, 09:40:21 AM

Hi all ...
which do you think is better for long-term projects, burn tokens or dividends every year?
both of these choices have their own advantages. which one is more reliable to increase prices and keep the ecosystem of tokens on the market?

I want to hear your opinion about these two things.

With EVOAI, you get a bit of the best of both worlds. They're burning unsold tokens, which increases the value. And you regularly get paid and share of the company's profits.

With that said, I would prefer dividends, since if you solely burn tokens yearly, yes the value of your tokens will increase. But you don't actually make any profit until you sell.

AgentZero23

member

Activity: 644

Merit: 10

Both will do and many projects now are considering of quarterly buy back and burn. Some new exchanges are now offering dividends to their token holders. This strategy is beneficial for both developers and investors. As this will attract more investors and price will surely go up. This is also good for long-term and dividends is surely a great passive income.

bit-freedom

sr. member

Activity: 658

Merit: 256

IMO, both dividends and burn coin methods are good for the project. I think the project has to apply the method more applicable for its business model.

MUG1WARA

full member

Activity: 1008

Merit: 101

My opinion the best way to make price of token go up and still have value is to burn tokens because when token is burned supply will decrease and will make price go up

oudekaas

full member

Activity: 350

Merit: 100

I thnk it would be better to burn tokens. After burning the total supply will decrease so the price of tokens will grow. It is more profitable as for me I'll choose this way. If you want to reach dividents you should hold these tokens all time without any movements.

belli4388

member

Activity: 197

Merit: 10

i think it's better if the tokens are burned so their value can only grow up with time, with dividends there would be a dump immediately after distribution

forexandcryptoauditor

copper member

Activity: 1162

Merit: 3

I think both methods will eventually increase the price of token if applied correctly.
As soon as I could is finished, unsold tokens should be burned.
This will lower the supply of tokens and thus will increase the demand which in turn will increase the price of token.
At later stage, dividends should be declared. This in turn will increase the demand and thus again price.
But here to avoid dumping, Dividends should not be applicable to every investor but to specific investors like for example to those who have invested worth more than $1000/-.

kaito.

member

Activity: 336

Merit: 11

buy back token and burn it every year would be prefferable for investor rather than divide it every year, it not just raise the value of the token in circulation but also promote to people that the project really value investor.
even if this does not guarantee that the token will drop in price but at least it can made investor fell safe that the token they Hodl will raise it value in the future.

rosezionjohn

sr. member

Activity: 882

Merit: 301

I like them both and I do not think one is better than the other. Both can have an effect on price but both will be useless also if the project turns out to have poor progress.

Yalovtsev

full member

Activity: 644

Merit: 100

For me, the burning of extra tokens will eventually lead to a higher price and capitalization than each year to distribute to others, since the number of tokens will increase,and the most value is assigned only when they become not enough,and there is a good demand for them, then the price rises sharply

Topic: which is better to burn tokens every year or dividends every year? (Read 224 times)