Topic: Which is the most superior science? (Read 444 times)

In my opinion, all sciences are important, but each in its own field. Also in each area can distinguish the main science and auxiliary. For example, mathematics as a science is very important, but more often it serves as an auxiliary, and is used for the development of other sciences. For example, the main sciences include physics, chemistry, psychology.

Physics is the ultimate goal of all science. This is the most essential thinking of human beings, who am I and where I am from. The independence of human formation thinking does not know why. Of course, no better science is equally important. Biology can make people healthy and longevity. It is very important to thank the people who are engaged in scientific research.

Mathematics is the language in which the universe speaks. And physics, chemistry, biology and even psychology are books that are written in this language.
The primacy of mathematics is a well-established concept. Despite the fact that it is rather a philosophical question that worries only the ego of mathematicians.
And I tend to think that it is necessary to study objects as systems. A chemist who does not know physics and mathematics is a bad chemist. A psychologist - not knowing physics and chemistry - a bad psychologist.

Without a language, how do you express yourself? Language is the foundation of every expression. If mathematics is then seen as a language, is the superior of all science as it is the root of others.

If you're asking about the importance in the modern world we can't deal without both physics and mathematics. If you're asking which one is older then it's math of course. Which one deals with more problems that surround us? I'd argue that it's physics. None of these two is more important, they're both crucial to being able to understand the world that surrounds us. For instance, physics describes matter, but you can't measure this matter without math. So on and so forth.

Very true.  Some of us are sane, others not so much.

I tried listening to the Qur'an on youtube.  Hearing it in Arabic was interesting, they sing it like it is a song...

In English, it is pathetic, worse than the bible...  I could only listen to about the first 30 minutes because I learned absolutely nothing about anything... it started out proclaiming how great God is, then immediately started bashing non-believers... every other sentence was something like, "there will be people who don't believe this, but they are stupid"... with zero facts or evidence to justify their claims

I tried skipping ahead to somewhere in the middle of the Qur'an, about 8 hours into the video, but it was just more of the same... I heard some nonsense about Noah, as if some guy over 1000 years later would know anything extra that the bible left out of the story:


There was zero useful information in there... it was all just bashing non-believers and proclaiming that Allah is amazing

I listened to less than 10% of the book, but it was horrible, and I learned exactly zero information about life, the universe, or anything... every sentence was complete horse-shit

as you stated, we're living in a society. and this society consists of people of different values. i guess, we cannot define a universal superior science. it will depend more on one's value. for example, take a 'mad professor' who cares about math only, than take a person who concentrates on his spirit (and is more interested in philosophy) and so on. we have different characteristics, abilities and values. and each of us needs a specific science to improve ourselves

He has listened to all of the person's talk

 But I'm sorry I'm not motivated at all, even though that person is holding a meeting with the Quran

Have you ever watched an American TV series called Bones? The main character, Temperance Brennan, was a researcher with a doctorate at the Jeffersonian Institute, the bestseller mystery novelist, fluent in at least 3 languages, and an Atheist. Temperance Brennan does not believe in God because he always thinks logically, only believes in what he sees and touches, and considers the Bible to be a fairy tale. This figure is a depiction of most Atheists throughout the world. So smart they are, that they don't believe in the existence of God because God is just a false figure that is not scientific. Or so they think. For those who are atheists, or there are signs in that direction because of doubts about the validity of a holy book, then try reading the Qur'an. Here are a few of the signs of God's greatness through Al-Qur'an verses that can be scientifically proven

I do not know who that person is, and clearly I do not believe at all what he is talking about. It is not at all the teachings of Islam.

To me neuroscience and psychology is one of the most superior science because it deals with the brain (neuroscience) and our behavior (psychology). Although neuroscience is not limited to just the brain, but also the central nervous system, many scientists focused on studying our brains but has not fully understand how consciousness works, which to me is an excellent tool and candidate for further study. Especially for someone who is interested in artificial intelligence or transhumanism, understanding how consciousness works is very important.

Faith is not a reliable method to discover the truth.

Here are some vids in Arabic to educate you on "science" in the Quran:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ILrF5Pk-bFs

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qQXjyuxpNdE

There is no science that is superior to religion

It is something that is already known by most Muslims, moreover by prosecutors of religion, the great virtue that God provides for people who study religion. The virtues mentioned in many verses of the Qur'an and the hadith of the Messenger of Allaah 'alaihi wa sallam, as well as the information from the scholars of the Salaf, to the point that Imam Ibn al-Qayyim in the first juz of his book "Miftahu Daaris Sa'adah" contains a special discussion on virtue and the glory of studying religion, in the chapter entitled: The virtue and glory (study) of science (religion), the explanation of the magnitude of the need to (study) this knowledge, as well as the dependence (faith) and salvation of a servant in the world and the hereafter to knowledge ( religion) this. In that chapter Ibnul Qayyim mentions more than one hundred and fifty aspects of the virtue of science, based on the arguments of the Qur'an and the Sunnah of the Messenger of Allaah alaihi wa sallam and the information of the scholars of salaf rahimahumullah, so that the discussion of the virtues of the knowledge mentioned in the book is a very complete and comprehensive discussion, which we may not find i There is no science that is superior to religion

eligious knowledge that is useful in the world and in the hereafter

Can I make a little joke? The most interesting and accurate science is - Kama Sutra! God forbid somewhere to make a mistake, be late, hesitate as immediately begin and physics and chemistry and biology and genetics. )))

Good picture, id say my most appreciated science woul probably by physics and least appreciated would be chemisty. But I actually think chemisty is the most powerful science and physics the least.

I agree with this. No science is superior than other. They all play a vital role in whatever discoveries and invention we have. In fact, everything in this world is associated with more than one branch of science, thus it is indeed that every science has an equal importance. Understanding every science would indeed be hard, but it would I think make you more well rounded human being.

If Sheldon is to be believed then it's Theoretical Physics. LOL

The study of psychology reveals what is responsible for making us human, but is inherently limited because it cannot be altered, simply understood.

With the study of social science, we can use what we know about psychology to create an ideal basis for civilization, which is actually on the right track for the first time in history thanks to technology on its way to democratizing humanity.

We cannot name philosophy a science. At least, not in the understanding of science in which we characterize physics, biology, mathematics or history. Philosophy is a metadiscipline that analyzes both the humanities and the natural sciences. It forms not only common ideological aspects, but also cultural and scientific ones as well. Science doesn`t contain within itself the criteria of the social significance of its results; it doesn`t engage in self-reflection. That is, its achievements can be applied both for the benefit and to the detriment. Thus, philosophy is concerned with reflections on the consequences of the application of the science achievements. It should make the analysis subject the consideration of science in its anthropological dimension and be responsible to humanity.

Although, to think of it, how do we define "superior"? If we suppose that the superior one is the foundation for all other sciences, i.e. fundamental, than it is mathematics.
This science has right tools to describe all processes covered by other sciences. Mathematics is a pure abstraction and which lets it suit every purpose and serve as the universal language. Don`t underestimate this role.