Pages:
Author

Topic: Which jurisdiction is better now? - page 2. (Read 1783 times)

sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
August 15, 2017, 11:28:05 AM
#5
Which jurisdiction is more suitable for ICO now? How do you like Hong Kong?

This is one question that majority of the ICO around are either don't know the answer to or they are outright shying away from providing answers about or they just go the default line and assume its not illegal but the answers is equally dicey aside USA whose body language as we all know is hostile towards bitcoin, no other country has been able to get a definite position and when they do, I am sure its going to become clearer.
newbie
Activity: 52
Merit: 0
August 15, 2017, 10:31:20 AM
#4
Yes, I agree that the situation is not understandable and takes time to fully understand it!
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
August 15, 2017, 06:47:59 AM
#3
Things are very unclear to be honest. It's not like any jurisdiction has banded up to include ICOs in their laws specifically. It's also up to question whether or not any jurisdiction would favor investors or developers but it's all very novel to law makers.
Thanks for the  reply! Difficult question.
legendary
Activity: 2422
Merit: 1451
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
August 15, 2017, 06:30:05 AM
#2
Things are very unclear to be honest. It's not like any jurisdiction has banded up to include ICOs in their laws specifically. It's also up to question whether or not any jurisdiction would favor investors or developers but it's all very novel to law makers.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
August 15, 2017, 06:28:32 AM
#1
Which jurisdiction is more suitable for ICO now? How do you like Hong Kong?
Pages:
Jump to: