Pages:
Author

Topic: Which of the following occupations is most inherently evil? (Read 1455 times)

donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1015
I've decided this poll is garbage. There's too much crossover. Bank executives generally are lobbyists and occasionally thieves. They often help with or design marketing campaigns (or at least buzzwords). Issue exists in almost all the responses and I don't like the wording at all. Lockin'.
legendary
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1003
I voted for the bwanker; a lot of these professions are rotten but this fella takes the cake in regard to scope and scale over the longest amount of time.
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1015
clarification: "religious official" refers to an official of a religion (self-declared or determined by some type of organized hierarchy), not any official who is religious....

can you plss add scammer on the poll Grin
Inserted into Thief category.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
if you want something do something!!!
can you plss add scammer on the poll Grin
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1015
Thief, but, I don't agree with defining hackers and thieves.
"Unauthorized crackers" sounds too much like White people in Detroit.

Go with "Blackhats" or something then.
Reasonable. Changed.
global moderator
Activity: 3794
Merit: 2612
In a world of peaches, don't ask for apple sauce
Hacker!!!



hackers might hack goverment sites while goverments just rob innocent people Cheesy

so politicians are worse Cheesy
Hackers also hack innocent people's computers, infect them and/or steal data such as bank account details and such. How's that for robbing people? In fact, most hackers are that sort of type.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 101
Hacker!!!



hackers might hack goverment sites while goverments just rob innocent people Cheesy

so politicians are worse Cheesy
sr. member
Activity: 297
Merit: 250
Hacker!!!
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Politicians.. they are all evil to the core of their souls }:[}
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 109
Thief, but, I don't agree with defining hackers and thieves.
"Unauthorized crackers" sounds too much like White people in Detroit.

Go with "Blackhats" or something then.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Interesting thread. This is a good chance to see what the fine global audience of this forum has to say.
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
i would have gone with computer programmer
I hate you..! Sad  Cry
full member
Activity: 140
Merit: 100
so my vote goes to drum roll .................. Politicians.
In my country Politicians for sure..!
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
i would have gone with computer programmer
sr. member
Activity: 257
Merit: 252
Banker most definitely.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 250
if you want something do something!!!
politician indeed

here in phillipines we are now facing a 10 or 100 billion pork barrel scam which involve some stinking rich politician
lol what can i say more about this topic they run the goverment so as the goverments money
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 101
Only one vote for politician :O

I am disappointed

They work really hard to ripp us off and this is the credit they get Cheesy
donator
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1015
Thief, but, I don't agree with defining hackers and thieves.
"Unauthorized crackers" sounds too much like White people in Detroit.
full member
Activity: 238
Merit: 109
Thief, but, I don't agree with defining hackers and thieves.
newbie
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
I was wondering if I was going to be the one to have to post this, I agree with you, it's the same logic that is used in blaming inanimate objects or a type of media for murder, just because someone does something that gets publicised a lot ( which is usually the cause for this kind of thinking ) doesn't mean that there is anything wrong with it, take Bitcoin for example, lots of media are claiming it's evil and it's only going to be used by terrorists and drug dealers, but do we listen to them? No, because we actually have knowledge on the subject and don't form prejudices against the people who use it, I also remember there being an article once about a small time banker who received bailout money and instead of running off with it like the rest of the CEO's did he actually gave it away to his employees because he knew the bank was going to collapse regardless.

Even when it comes to bankers and the military I refuse to get funnelled into this way of thinking where something inanimate or a title automatically equates somebody to being something.

The primary example that comes to my mind is the concept of gun freedoms. I don't live in America (so I have not been so greatly exposed to the mindset/attitude to guns over there) but here in Australia guns have been banned for more than a decade. Guns are usually immediately associated with murder and violence, simply for the fact that many crimes are committed with them and that they are designed for the purposing of harming others. However, the gun itself is not the problem (it is a tool) it is the intent of the person using it to harm people. So in this regard I do not feel that guns are are inherently evil nor the people who have made them - many simply seeking wealth. This, however, may seem to contradict my view that guns should be outlawed, which is actually a different argument altogether based upon the merits and problems associated with a gun free country.
Pages:
Jump to: