Pages:
Author

Topic: Which one did you use to gamble with more - page 2. (Read 999 times)

legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 2198
I stand with Ukraine.
January 13, 2024, 09:49:38 AM
~

Hmm, that's right. And if luckily a miracle happens you could lose the 2k to win just a 1.01 odds. But if you place the bet before starting the game and place the bet on the right place (the biggest team) you may get at least more than 1.50x odds. Smiley

You can get more than 150.00 odds and win, I can tell you that from my own experience. Look at this bet of mine:



Once I made a bet with over 200.00 odds, but cashed it out when the win was 43x of my bet, and you know what? The last match ended as I predicted and I realized that I could win 200x of my bet if I didn't cash out.

And also it's so hard to place a multibet on a live match because odds keep changing all the time.
legendary
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1200
Gamble responsibly
January 08, 2024, 04:31:13 AM
The systematic reasons to place stakes before the game starts is basically not just a destination for the newbie.
The earlier you places your bet the better chances you stands to secure higher odds of the game else if you places your stakes lately at the approach of the games kickstarts has you the tendencies of the game odds reduction.

It depends. As the match is approaching and if a club is not using one or two of their key players, the odd may not reduce. Another thing is that if an in-play began and no club scored yet, the higher would be the odd.

The disadvantage of what you meant is that if a club do not later use their first 11, the match might go against them. It is good to place bet closer to the day of the match, after you have known the full names of the players that the club is using.
sr. member
Activity: 504
Merit: 254
January 08, 2024, 04:22:16 AM
I prefer staking before matches start when I started to gamble as a newbie. I d to lose.
The systematic reasons to place stakes before the game starts is basically not just a destination for the newbie.
The earlier you places your bet the better chances you stands to secure higher odds of the game else if you places your stakes lately at the approach of the games kickstarts has you the tendencies of the game odds reduction.
sr. member
Activity: 2842
Merit: 326
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
January 08, 2024, 04:09:11 AM
I prefer staking before matches start when I started to gamble as a newbie. I later prefer virtual matches. I left both to staking on live matches which is what I gamble with most on bookies now.

This is just for fun. Let us post and have fun to know which one that most people on this forum that are posting on this gambling board like most.


Do not gamble more than you can afford to lose.
I do stake before matches having done all the pre-matches analysis thereafter pick my accumulated bets, I bet mostly on strong team to win a weak team, both team to score, over 1.5 etc all odds accumulated to maximum of 3.00 to 4.00, I am aware of betting on lives matches inplay for instance first half draw, no goals by either sides etc my problem with inplay betting is that I would prefer accumulating my bets but due to time factor that is why I prefer placing my bet before matches thereafter close my App to perform other tasks or concentrate on watching TV when my team is playing a match, though I do visit LiveScore or Flashscore to monitor the scores of my bets, I also bet with the amount of money I can afford to lose.
legendary
Activity: 1064
Merit: 1298
Lightning network is good with small amount of BTC
January 08, 2024, 04:06:48 AM
I prefer booking on live games than virtual games , live games are real live events which can be easily predicted based on the form and quality of players the team has, but as for virtual it is automated, and programmed and since it's a programm you can't easily predict the outcome, which makes it very difficult.
But I noticed about all games is that it is good to use just little amount of money to gamble because all these betting sites are existing to make money from their customers. Staking before match begin, virtual betting, live betting, casinos and others are just done by the gambling site with odds that are not favoring the gambler. That is why you will see gamblers more likely to lose than win.

And virtual betting takes more resources as the matches are played in seconds,  and when you lose you can rebet again and in the process loosing money, but for it will take an hour 45mins for a love bet to be loss or 45mins depending on the option booked.
There are many live bets that are going on and you may be selecting many of them one by one and staking them one by one. If you also stake on live bet, it may take just few minutes sometimes when you would have won or lost. Live bet may not necessarily take 90 minutes.
member
Activity: 308
Merit: 32
January 08, 2024, 03:56:32 AM
I prefer staking before matches start when I started to gamble as a newbie. I later prefer virtual matches. I left both to staking on live matches which is what I gamble with most on bookies now.

This is just for fun. Let us post and have fun to know which one that most people on this forum that are posting on this gambling board like most.


Do not gamble more than you can afford to lose.
I prefer booking on live games than virtual games , live games are real live events which can be easily predicted based on the form and quality of players the team has, but as for virtual it is automated, and programmed and since it's a programm you can't easily predict the outcome, which makes it very difficult.
And virtual betting takes more resources as the matches are played in seconds,  and when you lose you can rebet again and in the process loosing money, but for it will take an hour 45mins for a love bet to be loss or 45mins depending on the option booked.
sr. member
Activity: 938
Merit: 303
January 08, 2024, 03:42:49 AM
I am not a gambler but I prefer to bet on some teams that I support as a supporter. For example Argentina for Football. And since I am not a professional gambler I prefer to make a bet before starting the game for actually doing some fun.

But for professional gamblers, I think it's better to bet after starting the game and based on the situation.

     -   Your style is okay for me, and I actually like it too. Like you, I am not a professional gambler, but no matter how I gamble, my priority is always to have fun. Then it's probably normal that you bet before the football match starts, right?

That's why, whether you're a professional or not, it's the same in the end, and it's the same gambler, winning and losing often. Why do professional gamblers say he doesn't lose often? or because he has skills?
full member
Activity: 1484
Merit: 136
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
January 08, 2024, 03:30:37 AM
I choose live matches (in-play) because I like the thrill of betting, for example, on NBA matches. My favourite in NBA betting is that while watching, I can bet anytime I want, but of course there is a limit to the time where I can place my bet. Still, I like it more than anything else because I also like to play basketball and I'm getting exhausted from the game. Also, those card games I like more live, and I see that real person do the shaffle. I get entertained, and I also get thrilled by the match. The bonus is that I can do it anywhere and anytime, so if there is a live game, I will join, but of course if I still have funds to gamble.

I also stake before the match if, for instance, I have to do something or I'm at work, so I can still play bets before the game and only monitor the results after the match.
hero member
Activity: 2912
Merit: 556
Enterapp Pre-Sale Live - bit.ly/3UrMCWI
January 08, 2024, 03:16:00 AM
Betting before matches starts seems a bit dangerous for sports betting, I don't feel like the handicaps are real anymore after consecutive losses from the past months. I'm placing my bets on mid game on live matches because you can see the actual team there, their play, injury reports, live handicaps, etc. I always bet on NBA, and I can say that live betting is way more exciting than betting on pre-matches, if you know you know.

I've got an issue with ESPN on news about the every team injury reports, it seems like it is not accurate anymore, do you guys have other channels for this one? trying to bet on a live match.
The first two options for the game was easy to the gamblers,because the before predictions also need of the gamblers should have been more sports knowledge.The previous prediction results may changed,because we can’t predict the game of the players before the match,every match player game will be changed when they had some health issues in the real life.Most of the time the health problems will affect the same players on the match day,So sometimes the live match betting will be chosen by the gamblers to escape from the game loss,the first half itself define the game on the particular day.
Usually, it depends on someone's habits in placing bets because I know there are friends of mine who will place bets when the match is almost starting. They are still calm and have not placed their bets because they already have the option to bet. But other friends place their bets long before the match starts, and they usually collect a lot of information, compare it, and then choose the team that has a chance of winning. Even though the results of each friend's predictions will not always be correct, at least they have their own analysis and stick to that analysis to then place their bets.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1922
Shuffle.com
January 07, 2024, 07:06:27 PM
I mostly place pre-live bets overall because I don't always have the time to watch every match I bet on and with the help of good timing, you can catch some good early and late odds that could give you a slight edge.

My experience with live betting has been volatile and it's easy to lose a significant chunk of your bankroll if you suddenly have a disastrous day.

Virtual sport is an option I don't recommend, even though i've never placed a bet. I've seen others fall for it countless times and lose their money unnecessarily when they can wait the next day and bet on better matches.
hero member
Activity: 1652
Merit: 518
OrangeFren.com
January 07, 2024, 06:35:25 PM
Betting before matches starts seems a bit dangerous for sports betting, I don't feel like the handicaps are real anymore after consecutive losses from the past months. I'm placing my bets on mid game on live matches because you can see the actual team there, their play, injury reports, live handicaps, etc. I always bet on NBA, and I can say that live betting is way more exciting than betting on pre-matches, if you know you know.

I've got an issue with ESPN on news about the every team injury reports, it seems like it is not accurate anymore, do you guys have other channels for this one? trying to bet on a live match.


The first two options for the game was easy to the gamblers,because the before predictions also need of the gamblers should have been more sports knowledge.The previous prediction results may changed,because we can’t predict the game of the players before the match,every match player game will be changed when they had some health issues in the real life.Most of the time the health problems will affect the same players on the match day,So sometimes the live match betting will be chosen by the gamblers to escape from the game loss,the first half itself define the game on the particular day.
hero member
Activity: 798
Merit: 509
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
January 07, 2024, 06:27:38 PM
I prefer staking before matches start when I started to gamble as a newbie. I later prefer virtual matches. I left both to staking on live matches which is what I gamble with most on bookies now.

This is just for fun. Let us post and have fun to know which one that most people on this forum that are posting on this gambling board like most.
Do not gamble more than you can afford to lose.
It has been my norm to always stake b4 d match start because then I usually have a calm mind and enough time aswell to make my picks and make sure to be careful and very decisive with my picks because at that point I'm not in a hurry to in anyway stake or get my picks knowing I have the luxury of time.

If I wait for a live game before posting, chances are they I will make hurried picks and they may turn out not what I wanted because these picks weren't really rational enough, they were just random and solely dependent on luck with out much analysis, even tho I know much analysis does not guarantee winning but then it gives you an edge of the others who made random picks and have to stay luck dependent meanwhile you had conscious decision and so you are luck dependent on an average percentage.
hero member
Activity: 2688
Merit: 540
DGbet.fun - Crypto Sportsbook
January 07, 2024, 05:34:31 PM

Staking before matches start   
Live matches (in-play)


I could switch between the two basing up into the situation on which there are games on which it is already that running and i do able to see on who do have the upperhand or most
likely to win then i do make out those bets but of course it would really be needing on having other considerations aside on leading score etc...

Most of the time i do make out those bets before the the game starts on which sometimes basing up into that particular moment and
according to my mood. There are really times that i dont feel on doing something.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1189
Need Campaign Manager?PM on telegram @sujonali1819
January 06, 2024, 10:30:43 AM
I am not a gambler but I prefer to bet on some teams that I support as a supporter. For example Argentina for Football. And since I am not a professional gambler I prefer to make a bet before starting the game for actually doing some fun.

But for professional gamblers, I think it's better to bet after starting the game and based on the situation.

No, no, you are doing it right, mate. There are some drawbacks of betting on live games. Like when it's easy to predict the win of a team then bets are either not accepted or the multiplier you get is around 1.01. Like, how much you have to bet in order to win something decent? $2,000 to win around $20? It's not funny, it's stressful, right?

Hmm, that's right. And if luckily a miracle happens you could lose the 2k to win just a 1.01 odds. But if you place the bet before starting the game and place the bet on the right place (the biggest team) you may get at least more than 1.50x odds. Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 2198
I stand with Ukraine.
January 06, 2024, 09:58:25 AM
I am not a gambler but I prefer to bet on some teams that I support as a supporter. For example Argentina for Football. And since I am not a professional gambler I prefer to make a bet before starting the game for actually doing some fun.

But for professional gamblers, I think it's better to bet after starting the game and based on the situation.

No, no, you are doing it right, mate. There are some drawbacks of betting on live games. Like when it's easy to predict the win of a team then bets are either not accepted or the multiplier you get is around 1.01. Like, how much you have to bet in order to win something decent? $2,000 to win around $20? It's not funny, it's stressful, right?
hero member
Activity: 2828
Merit: 611
December 30, 2023, 09:50:12 AM
I am not a gambler but I prefer to bet on some teams that I support as a supporter. For example Argentina for Football. And since I am not a professional gambler I prefer to make a bet before starting the game for actually doing some fun.

But for professional gamblers, I think it's better to bet after starting the game and based on the situation.
I don't think that's necessary and it depends on the situation a professional gambler can understand when they need to make the bet before the match starts and when they need to do it after the game starts. Generally, one should make the bet before the game starts if the game is being played between two teams where one side has a high lead against the opponent when it comes to gameplay and general standings in that sport because you know they have a higher probability of winning and you will get higher odds if you make the bet before the game starts.

However, if there is a game that is being played between teams that are of equal strength, you might think of making your bet after the game starts so that you can evaluate the gameplay of the teams and decide which one has a better grip on the game today and make your bet accordingly.

I'm not a professional bettor as well, it's just what I think and what I would do in both situations. Every individual can have a different approach to their betting strategies.
legendary
Activity: 2436
Merit: 1189
Need Campaign Manager?PM on telegram @sujonali1819
December 30, 2023, 08:06:52 AM
I am not a gambler but I prefer to bet on some teams that I support as a supporter. For example Argentina for Football. And since I am not a professional gambler I prefer to make a bet before starting the game for actually doing some fun.

But for professional gamblers, I think it's better to bet after starting the game and based on the situation.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 2198
I stand with Ukraine.
December 30, 2023, 07:52:32 AM
I can't proudly say I have made any substantial winning on gambling since I am still inexperience concerned how to choose games I mean matches collectively, so I picked my games before match starts but I don't know if that is the best options though I have tried both side but I mostly noticed that live matches doesn't have the advantage of high odd. That is to say, whenever those matches goes live there odds reduces to 60 - 70 percentage which makes your output  (potential winning) very small especially when you are betting on a single matches.


It's not always like that. Look at this live match, for example:



A half of the game is over, the score is 0:0, and yet you can bet on the draw with 3.05 odds!
I'm not saying it's a recipe for making money, but betting on live games can be fun, trust me on that. Smiley
hero member
Activity: 2702
Merit: 672
I don't request loans~
December 27, 2023, 07:48:08 AM
I prefer staking before matches start when I started to gamble as a newbie. I later prefer virtual matches. I left both to staking on live matches which is what I gamble with most on bookies now.

This is just for fun. Let us post and have fun to know which one that most people on this forum that are posting on this gambling board like most.


Do not gamble more than you can afford to lose.
I usually do it before. I usually don't leave the live feed of a match after it starts so betting live doesn't appeal to me that much not to mention I hate having to think about what to bet since odds change all the time in live betting. I have tried it before though and as I said, I didn't like it that much. As for virtual betting, I think I tried it a couple of times? Probably less than 10 but yeah, it just didn't appeal to me that much.

I kinda switch it up with matches that I think can be really close though. In those cases I do live betting instead.
legendary
Activity: 2814
Merit: 1112
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
December 27, 2023, 06:36:08 AM
I prefer staking before matches start when I started to gamble as a newbie. I later prefer virtual matches. I left both to staking on live matches which is what I gamble with most on bookies now.

This is just for fun. Let us post and have fun to know which one that most people on this forum that are posting on this gambling board like most.


Do not gamble more than you can afford to lose.
I bet more when the match hasn't started compared to live matches and virtual football is something I've never done and considering doing so in the future.
Betting before the match starts is better in my opinion because I have time to analyze even though it is often wrong but betting on live matches seems to be a matter of luck because often I do it based on my feelings when watching the match being run, and also betting on live matches requires patience and also a fast internet connection because the odds change very quickly and a slow connection will prevent us from getting attractive odds because they have changed again quickly even though there is not much difference.
Pages:
Jump to: