Topic: which part of bounty could be more profitable - page 11. (Read 1774 times)
The beneficial part of the gift is the signature of the campaign. Because usually a sign more than other campaigns. Of course it is very profitable. Maybe you have to have a higher rating so that more can be obtained.
all bounty are the most fun and have their own complexity and this is a payment reference as translate, we have to update on the latest project if we want to get a part in the campaign, while our signatures can only join in one project to the end and blog, we must be smart in writing articles
Signature campaign can be profitable but you can participate only in one campaign at the same time,
while in other parts of the bounty you can participate in multiple campaigns.
Always look at the bounty budget allocation and analyze the split to be able to chose a profitable one.
while in other parts of the bounty you can participate in multiple campaigns.
Always look at the bounty budget allocation and analyze the split to be able to chose a profitable one.
From all the bounties I have managed, the translation, signature campaign and content creation campaigns tend to generate the highest number of tokens per user. However, I now include a special component in all of my bounties called "other" where users are able to assist with identifying campaign abusers and cheaters, earnings themselves a nice chunk of stakes whilst they're at it.
Signature is pretty good but if you has another skills you can try to join in blog bounty, youtube, and translator or anything skill you have and try to contact him in telegram and do your offer maybe he will interested.
in any case, I will always support the company's signature, which is more profitable than any social network. Of course, you can still earn good money with translation. Which part of bounty could be more profitable ?
Some people say that signature is the one . and some people prefer content creation or translation .
What do you think ?
Some people say that signature is the one . and some people prefer content creation or translation .
What do you think ?
It is depend on the allocation of each campaign, some projects gives a high percentage of allocation in signature and sometimes they give more in content creation or translation, but they are both worth it to do as well. If you have enough time to spend to this two options, much better because this two has a huge allocation among all the campaign.
I'm more of a bounty company supporter of the signature. But telegrams (if you have a blog) and a translation company are also very profitable.
You want to know which parts give more amount then signature, content, and translations. But need to research about the project in the deep. If you find a good project then the chance of more profit is good. It does not matter what type of your contribution (In Bounty) more how good project.
I believe that this one is definitely the right answer. However, it is lacking some important aspects:
- Signatures: Signatures are amazing and it's what we are all doing here. The advantage is that it's not that hard to enter, only get an account for some weeks where you active and try to help people so you get merit until you become a member.
The disadvantage is that it's hierarchical and not necessarily takes into account the quality of your work but your rank inside the forums. The difference in pay between member and Hero/Legendary could be around 7 times more for the exact same work. - Content: This one is interesting and it's also easy to submit your work and get rewarded at the end of the ICO phase based on the quality of your work and in the case of publishing it in a quality website, some consider it automatically as the highest quality.
However, the main and biggest point here is quality. It takes some practice to enter this one effectively. Videos enter in this category. - Translations: Translations are pretty good if you speak another language with certain degree of accuracy, you could even help yourself with some automatic tools and fix it accordingly.
However, it's not that easy to enter since only one gets picked for every language out of all the applications. Here quality also plays a very important role. If you submit work with poor quality nobody will obviously want to work with you and/or pay you.
I personally don't find the other options attractive. Especially since it's easy for people to use bots in them.
Signature is pretty good but if you has another skills you can try to join in blog bounty, youtube, and translator or anything skill you have and try to contact him in telegram and do your offer maybe he will interested.
Signature bounties are very profitable but I suggest you try also social media campaigns because they have high rewards
You have an honest point here mate, many bounty hunter entrusted their future with signature bounties due to reasons of profitable rewards which every participant could receive after a project became successful and most important it will reach it's hardcap. Thinking of it positively could brought us good results as long as we remain consistent with our support of the projects community, through spreading their platform I guess that will earn successful results in the future.
Translation bounty pays the most. This is because the number of persons are always limited so the stakes are high. Also on signature if you on a high rank you can also earn well.
Of course with the ranking in this forum and the allocation given to the signature campaign is clearly a very large part of the revenue from a project, why does the signature campaign generate more tokens than social media campaigns because of differences in the number of participants participating in the project because a little distribution of tokens will be bigger, it can be different from Facebook campaigns, there are so many participants that we will receive very little income from the campaign.
there are a lot of bounty campaigns that are good but i still can not believe that ylu can get soemthing useful from them Which part of bounty could be more profitable ?
Some people say that signature is the one . and some people prefer content creation or translation .
What do you think ?
well i think that it is better to form your own opinion and to try both of this things and find out waht is better for you Some people say that signature is the one . and some people prefer content creation or translation .
What do you think ?
Of course with the ranking in this forum and the allocation given to the signature campaign is clearly a very large part of the revenue from a project, why does the signature campaign generate more tokens than social media campaigns because of differences in the number of participants participating in the project because a little distribution of tokens will be bigger, it can be different from Facebook campaigns, there are so many participants that we will receive very little income from the campaign.
Translation bounty give the most reward there's no contest on that, other than translation bounty, most of the time signature campaign gives more reward than telegram, twitter, facebook but some manager allocates more reward on social media campaigns
.
.
Which part of bounty could be more profitable ?
Some people say that signature is the one . and some people prefer content creation or translation .
What do you think ?
The most profitable is the one that you can actually perform in the right way, I see a lot of people trying to claim bounties out of translation campaigns and when you see the work that they do you know that they do not deserve to get paid, and I'm sure that there are many examples of the very same happening in the other campaigns that a bounty may offer.Some people say that signature is the one . and some people prefer content creation or translation .
What do you think ?
So you need to concentrate yourself in what you can actually do so you become profitable when you begin to claim bounties, for example if a person has never had a social media account and decides to participate in a social media bounty then that person is going to fail.
Which part of bounty could be more profitable ?
Some people say that signature is the one . and some people prefer content creation or translation .
What do you think ?
When you do try to look on most bounty allocations then I would say content creation or translations would really have much more than stakes or possible income than on signature ones. Due to difficulty we can already presume that it would really be much harder to make translations than just posting on this forum itself and comparing on the participants you would really be much more obliged on a single spot yet it would matter on the language you are into when we do talk about trans. Some people say that signature is the one . and some people prefer content creation or translation .
What do you think ?
I agree with these opinions. But I will add that the work in the social network is paid well.
Signature bounties are very profitable but I suggest you try also social media campaigns because they have high rewards
I think it depends on your abilities.
Content creation is evaluated by quality criteria. For bad content you will not be rewarded well. Signature in this sense is easier. It is not necessary to be able to mount video, audio, etc.
I'm sure that high-quality content of high quality is paid very highly.
Content creation is evaluated by quality criteria. For bad content you will not be rewarded well. Signature in this sense is easier. It is not necessary to be able to mount video, audio, etc.
I'm sure that high-quality content of high quality is paid very highly.
Jump to: