Pages:
Author

Topic: Which pool are best now ? - page 2. (Read 4064 times)

member
Activity: 105
Merit: 10
October 30, 2013, 05:09:56 AM
#24
Another vote for HHTT, link to pool i :-\n Sig.
donator
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1060
between a rock and a block!
October 29, 2013, 03:59:25 PM
#23
any suggestion?
I like Eligius, no account and password to setup and issues with that to worry about... recall what occurred with 50btc recently as an example.
legendary
Activity: 1379
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
October 29, 2013, 03:24:45 PM
#22
p2pool.info is best at any time because of it nature!
- 0% fee
- PPLNS
- tx fee for miners
- decentralised (ddos impossible)

HHTT is on a par on a lot of things and easier to setup:

- 0.5% fee (p2pool has a default 1% fee to its author which you have to disable if you want to be 0% fees)
- PPLNS
- 1/2 transaction fees for the miner who solves a block
- high availability and resiliency (I won't say it cannot be DDOSed... but a lot of p2pool nodes could be easily).

spiccioli
sr. member
Activity: 395
Merit: 250
October 29, 2013, 04:27:05 AM
#21
p2pool.info is best at any time because of it nature!
- 0% fee
- PPLNS
- tx fee for miners
- decentralised (ddos impossible)
hero member
Activity: 2576
Merit: 883
Freebitco.in Support https://bit.ly/2I9BVS2
October 28, 2013, 08:34:09 AM
#20
It depends how you define best. Everyone will have their own reasons.

I like in order:

1) Reliable
2) Cheap
3) Big (Smaller pools have more variance.)

So I use Bitminter.

Good Ddos protection.
1% fee
Current hash rate gets average 10 blocks a day.

Yes BTC Guild is bigger but they charge a 3% fee.
sr. member
Activity: 322
Merit: 250
October 28, 2013, 08:16:18 AM
#19
BTCguild Smiley, reason cause they have good DDOS protection and is the biggest pool.
hero member
Activity: 728
Merit: 500
cryptoshark
October 28, 2013, 03:35:59 AM
#18
https://polmine.pl/?setlang=en is the best.

PPS: 0.000063310763 mBTC very good Smiley
merged mining nmc
you get fees also
no downtime, no ddos (uptime about 90 days)


nice charts and stats
instant payments
dont worry about luck
shareholders payments
vardiff depends on port you choose
hall of fame (top hashrates, block founders, shares)

sr. member
Activity: 466
Merit: 250
October 19, 2013, 11:02:24 AM
#17
BTCguild is the best...

Yes, let's all point our miners to BTC Guild.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
October 19, 2013, 08:20:39 AM
#16
BTCguild is the best...
legendary
Activity: 3583
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
October 18, 2013, 10:11:07 PM
#15
Low end ASIC would be okay.  The problem comes with trying to solo mine against Bitcoin-QT with a a lot of hash rate.

Yep, I'm going to wait and see how things shake out before investing in anymore hardware.

The point .85 version of Bitcoin-QT actually works pretty good for solo with my BE's.  Now to see how long the BE's will actually last.

how have you tested to insure that your solo endeavor will payout correctly, to the right wallet?

What wallet would you expect it to payout too?  Not sure I know what you mean?

I'm not sure what i mean either. If you find a block the 25 BTCs goe into the QT wallet you are mining with? how do you know it will work?

I've heard that it works.
hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 501
October 18, 2013, 09:25:10 PM
#14
Low end ASIC would be okay.  The problem comes with trying to solo mine against Bitcoin-QT with a a lot of hash rate.

Yep, I'm going to wait and see how things shake out before investing in anymore hardware.

The point .85 version of Bitcoin-QT actually works pretty good for solo with my BE's.  Now to see how long the BE's will actually last.

how have you tested to insure that your solo endeavor will payout correctly, to the right wallet?

What wallet would you expect it to payout too?  Not sure I know what you mean?

I'm not sure what i mean either. If you find a block the 25 BTCs goe into the QT wallet you are mining with? how do you know it will work?
legendary
Activity: 3583
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
October 18, 2013, 09:21:03 PM
#13
Low end ASIC would be okay.  The problem comes with trying to solo mine against Bitcoin-QT with a a lot of hash rate.

Yep, I'm going to wait and see how things shake out before investing in anymore hardware.

The point .85 version of Bitcoin-QT actually works pretty good for solo with my BE's.  Now to see how long the BE's will actually last.

how have you tested to insure that your solo endeavor will payout correctly, to the right wallet?

What wallet would you expect it to payout too?  Not sure I know what you mean?
legendary
Activity: 1379
Merit: 1003
nec sine labore
October 18, 2013, 03:18:43 PM
#12
any suggestion?

HHTT

Reliable and low fees.

spiccioli
hero member
Activity: 768
Merit: 1000
October 18, 2013, 12:11:46 PM
#11
I use http://mmpool.bitparking.com/pool

It's little with just ~11 TH/s, but the winning margins with nmc and the other alts are nice.

Also if more people jump in, would be much better

hero member
Activity: 490
Merit: 501
October 18, 2013, 11:51:59 AM
#10
Low end ASIC would be okay.  The problem comes with trying to solo mine against Bitcoin-QT with a a lot of hash rate.

Yep, I'm going to wait and see how things shake out before investing in anymore hardware.

The point .85 version of Bitcoin-QT actually works pretty good for solo with my BE's.  Now to see how long the BE's will actually last.

how have you tested to insure that your solo endeavor will payout correctly, to the right wallet?
hero member
Activity: 1246
Merit: 501
October 18, 2013, 02:48:17 AM
#9
I've tried all the big pools - BTCGuild, EMC, Slush's, and P2Pool.  I always end up back with Eligius, though.  They're the most reliable for me.

P2Pool was OK, but variance is high due to a low hashrate, and you really need a decent machine to run it on.  Running P2Pool needed an i3 3.3GHz running 24/7, where just mining with Eligius means I can get away with running a tiny TPLink 703N micro-router running OpenWRT which uses less than 2W.
legendary
Activity: 3583
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
October 17, 2013, 08:52:43 PM
#8
Low end ASIC would be okay.  The problem comes with trying to solo mine against Bitcoin-QT with a a lot of hash rate.

Yep, I'm going to wait and see how things shake out before investing in anymore hardware.

The point .85 version of Bitcoin-QT actually works pretty good for solo with my BE's.  Now to see how long the BE's will actually last.
hero member
Activity: 756
Merit: 500
October 17, 2013, 08:49:30 PM
#7
I jump around between BTCGuild and Bitminter trying to catch lucky streaks... sometimes it works sometimes... not so much. 
legendary
Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007
October 17, 2013, 08:47:51 PM
#6
Bitcoin-QT

Bitcoin-QT is a terrible pool if you have ASICs Tongue

If your a low end ASIC miner, like me, may as well solo mine on a machine that is running all the time anyway and forget about it for a couple years and see what happens.  Power consumption is low enough to not worry too much about power costs.  Many of us have a machine, or two, that needs to run 24/7 anyway.

That's what I'm thinking of doing anyway.

Low end ASIC would be okay.  The problem comes with trying to solo mine against Bitcoin-QT with a a lot of hash rate.  It doesn't keep up with high speeds (unless bfgminer has been updated to do its own extranonce-rolling when solo mining against Bitcoin-QT).
legendary
Activity: 3583
Merit: 1094
Think for yourself
October 17, 2013, 08:40:12 PM
#5
Bitcoin-QT

Bitcoin-QT is a terrible pool if you have ASICs Tongue

If your a low end ASIC miner, like me, may as well solo mine on a machine that is running all the time anyway and forget about it for a couple years and see what happens.  Power consumption is low enough to not worry too much about power costs.  Many of us have a machine, or two, that needs to run 24/7 anyway.

That's what I'm thinking of doing anyway.
Pages:
Jump to: