Pages:
Author

Topic: Which presidential candidate would you vote for? - page 2. (Read 1107 times)

legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
Voting in a presidential election in the US is pointless, it doesn't matter who wins, we all lose.  The office was bought and paid for by US corporations a long, long time ago, and does nothing to serve its people.

George Carlin, as always, had the best take on it: https://youtu.be/xIraCchPDhk
legendary
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1115
★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!
I begrudgingly like Rand Paul in a thoroughly unimpressive republican field, and Bernie Sanders on the other side for having a principled point. However, neither of them get my vote in the general election, as it's going to Gary Johnson. I do not find acceptable the manipulative ways both democrats and republicans conspire to keep all third parties out of the debates and off the ballots, so I will not be voting for any of their candidates, as it only precipitates the problem. The candidates aren't the biggest problem, it's the two parties and how seek to control the government at all costs.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
I mean that there is no real difference. Rand seems better than others but the president represents an executive branch of power so this position requires significant management experience. Rand has legislative experience but I wouldn't be so sure about his abilities to run executive branch of power. Any person who has no sufficient experience in governing is  doomed to be a puppet. That's why some chief executable or former governor would be more preferable in terms of working in the executive office.

I disagree. I feel a chief executive would be worse, as they A: never ran for office, B: Don't know legislation, C: Won't know US legislative process like the senators

C also applies to governors
legendary
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
I mean that there is no real difference. Rand seems better than others but the president represents an executive branch of power so this position requires significant management experience. Rand has legislative experience but I wouldn't be so sure about his abilities to run executive branch of power. Any person who has no sufficient experience in governing is  doomed to be a puppet. That's why some chief executable or former governor would be more preferable in terms of working in the executive office.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Myself.

Are you seriously going to use the write-in to do yourself, or are you hillary clinton in disguise?
legendary
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1359
Myself.
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
Please let me know if I missed one. Not all have announced yet, but assuming they do.

  I Stand With Rand!
Pages:
Jump to: