I have been a computer technician for quite sometime, and for most of the time people have chosen to buy motherboards that supports AMD processors. On benchmarks for CPUs you will see that intel achieves the highest status or is leading always and AMD is always behind in terms of performance. There competition was so close for both manufacturer. Neither was a bad one. But why would people choose AMD? They would answer me often that intel was more expensive for the same performance as a comparison. So while intel tops the cpu performance AMD is cheaper but works good as well. Check CPU benchmarks for more detail! I would often go there for comparison especially if customers wanted a bit less.
It's here hope this helps!
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
Topic: Which processor ismuch better amd or Intel ? (Read 371 times)
I think AMD is much better! even a lot of people uses Intel processor.
its now a trends that Intel are most using processor in this days, most to person trust on Intel processor
i prefer Intel.
i prefer Intel.
Something interesting to point out, Intel is now coming with AMD inside!
"Yet, as we mentioned before, Intel has officially started shipping its high-end H-series mobile CPU chips with AMD graphics on board. In turn, this means that hardier laptops powered by Intel can now be thinner and their accompanying silicon footprints will be over 50% smaller, according to Intel client computing group vice president Christopher Walker."
https://www.techradar.com/news/computing-components/processors/intel-vs-amd-which-processor-is-best-936589
"Yet, as we mentioned before, Intel has officially started shipping its high-end H-series mobile CPU chips with AMD graphics on board. In turn, this means that hardier laptops powered by Intel can now be thinner and their accompanying silicon footprints will be over 50% smaller, according to Intel client computing group vice president Christopher Walker."
https://www.techradar.com/news/computing-components/processors/intel-vs-amd-which-processor-is-best-936589
The arm architecture. Things are changing, and you will start seeing those more in servers and even desktops, not just smartphones or raspis...
A signal? Microsoft ported Windows 10 for it. Not that you should use it, Linux is better.
Huawei Rolls 7-nm Arm Server CPU | EE Times
The arm architecture has the advantage of being more power efficient, so called "risc" and no need to support decades old "cisc" instructions, or what modern processors do which is "decomplex" those cisc instructions to make them risc like then "recomplex" them again to satisfy software expecting it. All that baggage is removed with better non legacy architectures.
Intel actually tried to do the right thing in the past, with Itanium, but the market did not understood it and Microsoft didn't support it thus ruining sales.
There were others in the past but mostly didn't survive. I could mention IBM's power that fared a bit while with Apple... Which reminds me: Apple (macs) is going arm as well, so there.
Who would have thought that the British would conquer the world again? And from the 8 bit golden era of computing, no less!
A signal? Microsoft ported Windows 10 for it. Not that you should use it, Linux is better.
Huawei Rolls 7-nm Arm Server CPU | EE Times
The arm architecture has the advantage of being more power efficient, so called "risc" and no need to support decades old "cisc" instructions, or what modern processors do which is "decomplex" those cisc instructions to make them risc like then "recomplex" them again to satisfy software expecting it. All that baggage is removed with better non legacy architectures.
Intel actually tried to do the right thing in the past, with Itanium, but the market did not understood it and Microsoft didn't support it thus ruining sales.
There were others in the past but mostly didn't survive. I could mention IBM's power that fared a bit while with Apple... Which reminds me: Apple (macs) is going arm as well, so there.
Who would have thought that the British would conquer the world again? And from the 8 bit golden era of computing, no less!
I have Intel for I don't even remember how long. Back then it was the only thing available out there. But maybe the time has changed and AMD has something better to offer
I used to run AMD for my mining rigs. I ran into too many problems with AMD slowing down cores and things like that. Intel with the i5 or i7 with boost technology for the cores is what I run now. Much smoother overall.
share your thoughts 
I believe it's intel. Why? It's because whenever I gamble, my computer doesn't get overheat when I'm using that. Unlike AMD, it's getting hotter as I use it. share your thoughts
if you have a lot of money you should use INTEL but if you only have money that fits better AMD because it's not too much different the advantages and disadvantages of both of them
For me there is not much difference.
As AMD and Intel has both advantages and disadvantages. For example, AMD has a lower price with the same performance, but the “tops” of AMD in each segment is at least 2-10%, but slower than similar CPU from Intel.
As AMD and Intel has both advantages and disadvantages. For example, AMD has a lower price with the same performance, but the “tops” of AMD in each segment is at least 2-10%, but slower than similar CPU from Intel.
I prefer intel because it's realy friendly with adobe product.
And my nvidia vga too
And my nvidia vga too
I think that AMD is a better choice than Intel because of its cheaper price. You can get nearly the same clock rate and CPU cores as an Intel for half the price. While this is a fact, one cannot deny that Intel is the leader in microprocessor technology. So, Intel would be the winner in terms of quality and endurance.
Earlier and now I chose Intel because of the test of time and experience, but now many of my friends are AMD and they are not inferior to Intel, while having a price 50% lower
Intel 100%
There is two factors: price and what do you do. AMD is cheaper and better at tasks like streaming and rendering, Intel is better for gaming but costs more(way too much if you ask me). Personally, I would recommend something like R5 2600x as a budget choice and R7 2700x as an expensive one.
I've been using Intel since when I first met a computer. I'm pretty happy with it.
both the processor has its own advantages and disadvantages. it all depends on you and your requirements on what you choose.
it depends on your requirements. but i use intel processor.
The best processor is the human brain 
. In the second place - Intel 
. In the second place - Intel on a personal level i choose Intel
On a personal level I use Intel as well, on a non-personal level though..
Jump to: