just take a look at stake, sportsbet, duelbits, bitsler, just to name a few.
All of those books will ban or limit. They don't mind paying out to those they feel will give it back. All players get profiled. They aren't taking sharp action for long.
Do you have any back up with your statement here? Because I've seen all the casinos he mentioned above are actually big and trustworthy casinos in this forum, especially bitsler and stake because they're an old casino. According to their social medias, there's always a user who win a big amount money and they have pay it accordingly, that's make them are professional for high rollers. Until now, I don't see any accusations from the high rollers get limit his accounts against those casinos.
There's a difference between a high roller and a professional gambler. Books don't want professionals but they will take 5 BTC from a high roller. The professional syndicates get "beards" or "runners" to get down more action when they get banned or limited.
In beginning Stake limit is really high, but later it depends on your winning/loosing.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5326990.20
How Bookmakers Profile Winning Players And Thoughts On Tipsters
https://www.tradematesports.com/blog/bookmaker-profile-winning-players-thoughts-tipstersWHAT DO THEY LOOK FOR WHEN PROFILING?
It is important to note that risk departments aren’t exactly the same at all bookmakers, but there are a few things they look for in general, that apply to most of them;
· Is the account profitable? As crazy as this might seem, this is the reality of the situation. If your account is profitable, you will get noticed. It is impossible to hide from this fact.
· Is the account considered to be sensitive to prices, and has the account placed a bet through a medium that is considered to be price sensitive? This might, for example, be a site that compares prices. Sharp bettors are considered to be price sensitive, and as a result they are not wanted.
· When was the bet placed? If it was placed earlier than a day before the match or event will signal that something might be “wrong”, and raise attention to your account.
· Is the price to be considered an Arbitrage price?
· Did the price decrease greatly following the placement of the bet? The closing price is a lot more accurate than what the opening price is.
· Did the bettor only place one bet, or did the bettor place a series of bets? This point might be debatable, but the common bookies like to see you place more than one bet at a time. This is because they want you to want as much action as possible, and for them to be able to profit at a maximum from you.
· Have you made withdrawals rather than deposits? Bookies do not like to lose money.
· Did you use an E-wallet when you had plenty of options that are more directly connected with the bookmaker available? This could be recognised as betting sharply, as you give the impression of wanting to move your money in fast fashion. This could also be mistaken as money laundering, which might lead to having your account flagged, regardless if you are or not.
· If you haven’t used the casino, you should consider doing it.
· Bookmakers don’t like bettors that place bets at niche markets, and don’t play the events that they highlight themselves.
· Bookies also don’t like high stakes, as they make more money when people bet “for fun”. This is usually synonymous with placing low stakes.
· Consider using the mobile platform that the bookie suggests. If not, be wary when changing IP Address.
· Bookmakers actually raise their eyebrows when a woman places a bet, as they are not thought to be the “conventional” client. If they do, the bookmaker might suspect that they are going to exploit Arbitrage opportunities, or are a bowler account.
· Do your bets match your demographic? Bookmakers are more thorough in gathering of background information nowadays. In the old days, the bookmaker might only want rich clients, but in the present they even accept students.
· Do you allow their cookies on the site?
· Have you placed bets at the same time as other bettors? Or have you placed bets at the same time as Arbitrage Bettors or Tipsters?
· Never bet on a match that is fixed, or that might be considered to be fixed. This will flag you, whether it was intentional or unintentional.
· Never establish yourself in the industry of tipsters, don’t associate yourself with the industry, don’t be friends or follow people in social media that are associated with betting.
There are probably other factors that play their part as well, but the list above works like a pointer, and if you follow these tips, your accounts might be safe. If you end up being limited or cancelled, ask yourself if you followed the list.
TIPSTERS
In the closing paragraphs, I will discuss the subject of Tipsters. Most of the time, bookmakers aren’t concerned with Tipsters (when considering the sharp betting perspective). Most bookmakers have a very high number of clients that follow the tips of Tipsters blindly, and therefore they don’t instantly inspire fear.
Again, Steve has expressed his thoughts on Tipsters, as they in no way guarantee of a profit. Tipsters contribute to creating markets that are heavily weighted on one of the sides, which is unfavourable in the smaller and most liquid markets. Tipsters might also create overlaps with the points in the list above.
In general, a Tipster will try to tip at the best price and a long time before the event starts. Often, Tipsters are the reasons for why prices collapse. If some of their subscribers place high stakes at the exchanges, they might make other bettors look like Arbers (Arbitrage Bettors).
This collapse could trigger those who bet on prices that are currently dropping, to push the market even lower, leaving the bookie with a negative and horrible result. This result would be difficult to turn into something positive, as they weren’t quick enough when changing the price. This is why bookmakers follow Tipsters closely.
I, myself, have signed up for trials at Tipster services, to see and to understand the angle that Tipsters were taking, and if I had overlooked anything. Generally, compilers respect Tipsters that appear to be compiling their own price further, before they eventually tip a selection.
A compiler that knew what he/she was doing, would always use the Tipsters to learn, if they had a great merit and history. Compilers will quickly dismiss Tipsters that don’t have any results that are verified, that don’t seem to have a clear strategy, and the ones with inflated ROIs beyond what they deem to be likely.
Said in other words, we as compilers, are trying to do the same as the punters are doing in high volumes nowadays, in addition to seeing who we should take seriously.
Websites that were related to betting, with useful stats and calculations of models were of high interest for us. Most of them were checked, but as it turned out, we were already sitting on the information from the past.
