Pages:
Author

Topic: 🔥While you can't prove Roger Ver is simply a greedy person I can prove BCH >BTC - page 2. (Read 410 times)

sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 260
Bitcoin SV is Bitcoin
Roger Ver helped Bitcoin Legacy before helping Bitcoin Cash. Can we stop with that ad hominems?
Bitcoin Cash have not any scaling problem, it was solved with 8mb blocks. Centralizes networks like tipprbot or Lighning Network are safer on Bitcoin Cash because Segwit make 0 confirms transactions less secure!

No, I can't, because quite simply the amount of damage he's done to his reputation over the years far outweighs any positive work I've seen him do with bitcoin. His work is currently with Bcash and if you want us to remember the "good ole" days you might want to run it past him that he comes off as a total douche.

And let's not pretend that if Bcash was actually used on the same capacity as Bitcoin that eventually it wouldn't have the exact same scaling issues. It's like fixing a water leak by buying a bigger bucket to catch the water in. Eventually that bucket is going to fill up too homeboy. You clearly don't have much coding experience if you think this is a viable solution.

It's what I like to call "kicking the can down the road for future generations".
A wallet bucket that never gets empty? Bitcoin Cash mempool gets empty after every block.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 260
Bitcoin SV is Bitcoin
Bitcoin Trash {aka BCash} is going to fail soon. Anyone with a bit of knowledge on how scaling works and how limited

Blockchain upgrades are, will tell you that it is going to fail in the near future. Roger Ver must be paying you a lot of money to

come to a Bitcoin {BTC} forum, to promote your Shitcoin. SegWit & Lightning network will sweep the floor with BCash and

even Roger Ver acknowledged that BCash will need to incorporate it as a scaling solution for it's scaling problems in the

future.  Grin Grin

You supporting this guy? ---> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCOjCEth6xI
Roger Ver helped Bitcoin Legacy before helping Bitcoin Cash. Can we stop with that ad hominems?
Bitcoin Cash have not any scaling problem, it was solved with 8mb blocks. Centralizes networks like tipprbot or Lighning Network are safer on Bitcoin Cash because Segwit make 0 confirms transactions less secure!

Post the number of transaction Bcash does. I'll wait.
Each month more bussiness use it and soon Bitpay will enable even more people to use it: https://blockdozer.com/insight/
https://fork.lol/blocks/size

That's all the transactions Bcash does? LOL I hope you're being paid for this. Sad if you are, but I truly hope so.
How many people is buying things with Bitcoin Legacy? Or do you think it can be  a store of value if is not a mean of echange? Gold works as a store of value because have other uses.
sr. member
Activity: 560
Merit: 260
No need to prove anything as the market will do that automatically.   Right now it's BTC 241 to BCH 45.    BTC are the New England Patriots and BCH is the best Arena Football League team, whatever that might be.

jr. member
Activity: 36
Merit: 1
Bitcoin Trash {aka BCash} is going to fail soon. Anyone with a bit of knowledge on how scaling works and how limited

Blockchain upgrades are, will tell you that it is going to fail in the near future. Roger Ver must be paying you a lot of money to

come to a Bitcoin {BTC} forum, to promote your Shitcoin. SegWit & Lightning network will sweep the floor with BCash and

even Roger Ver acknowledged that BCash will need to incorporate it as a scaling solution for it's scaling problems in the

future.  Grin Grin

You supporting this guy? ---> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCOjCEth6xI
Roger Ver helped Bitcoin Legacy before helping Bitcoin Cash. Can we stop with that ad hominems?
Bitcoin Cash have not any scaling problem, it was solved with 8mb blocks. Centralizes networks like tipprbot or Lighning Network are safer on Bitcoin Cash because Segwit make 0 confirms transactions less secure!

Post the number of transaction Bcash does. I'll wait.
Each month more bussiness use it and soon Bitpay will enable even more people to use it: https://blockdozer.com/insight/
https://fork.lol/blocks/size

That's all the transactions Bcash does? LOL I hope you're being paid for this. Sad if you are, but I truly hope so.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 260
Bitcoin SV is Bitcoin
Bitcoin Trash {aka BCash} is going to fail soon. Anyone with a bit of knowledge on how scaling works and how limited

Blockchain upgrades are, will tell you that it is going to fail in the near future. Roger Ver must be paying you a lot of money to

come to a Bitcoin {BTC} forum, to promote your Shitcoin. SegWit & Lightning network will sweep the floor with BCash and

even Roger Ver acknowledged that BCash will need to incorporate it as a scaling solution for it's scaling problems in the

future.  Grin Grin

You supporting this guy? ---> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCOjCEth6xI
Roger Ver helped Bitcoin Legacy before helping Bitcoin Cash. Can we stop with that ad hominems?
Bitcoin Cash have not any scaling problem, it was solved with 8mb blocks. Centralizes networks like tipprbot or Lighning Network are safer on Bitcoin Cash because Segwit make 0 confirms transactions less secure!

Post the number of transaction Bcash does. I'll wait.
Each month more bussiness use it and soon Bitpay will enable even more people to use it: https://blockdozer.com/insight/
https://fork.lol/blocks/size
jr. member
Activity: 36
Merit: 1
Bitcoin Trash {aka BCash} is going to fail soon. Anyone with a bit of knowledge on how scaling works and how limited

Blockchain upgrades are, will tell you that it is going to fail in the near future. Roger Ver must be paying you a lot of money to

come to a Bitcoin {BTC} forum, to promote your Shitcoin. SegWit & Lightning network will sweep the floor with BCash and

even Roger Ver acknowledged that BCash will need to incorporate it as a scaling solution for it's scaling problems in the

future.  Grin Grin

I agree with this guy. Bcash simply has the upper hand at the moment, but the second Bitcoin has lower fees the whole narrative Bcash followers live by will suddenly look much less appetizing. Bcash is literally a very simple change to 8mb blocks, that's nothing to be proud of. I'd rather have the more efficient coin.

It's also more about Roger's obvious hostile "take over" by trying to trick people into thinking Bcash is the real Bitcoin by utilizing the Bitcoin name, Bitcoin.com domain (which Satoshi deemed "not official" from the beginning) and continuously trying to tie Satoshi's vision to Bcash's vision when in reality if you read the white paper that's purely up for personal interpretation. That in itself is why Bcash will never be the real Bitcoin. I can 100% gaurantee that.

Bcash has cut off it's own nose to spite it's face.

And Roger is definitely greedy lol, you've never heard him talk on youtube? He rubbed the "self-made millionaire" thing in everyones faces so much it's hard not to see him as anything but greedy & egotistical. It's his demeanor... his body language... the way he talks down to others instead of making a coherent argument... he's an obvious psychopath.
Nobody owns the Bitcoin name, is called decentralization and Bitcoin Cash is a fork of Bitcoin, not an altcoin so it makes sense use the Bitcoin name.

Use any name you want. Even Craig Wright uses the Satoshi name. LOL
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 260
Bitcoin SV is Bitcoin
Bitcoin Trash {aka BCash} is going to fail soon. Anyone with a bit of knowledge on how scaling works and how limited

Blockchain upgrades are, will tell you that it is going to fail in the near future. Roger Ver must be paying you a lot of money to

come to a Bitcoin {BTC} forum, to promote your Shitcoin. SegWit & Lightning network will sweep the floor with BCash and

even Roger Ver acknowledged that BCash will need to incorporate it as a scaling solution for it's scaling problems in the

future.  Grin Grin

I agree with this guy. Bcash simply has the upper hand at the moment, but the second Bitcoin has lower fees the whole narrative Bcash followers live by will suddenly look much less appetizing. Bcash is literally a very simple change to 8mb blocks, that's nothing to be proud of. I'd rather have the more efficient coin.

It's also more about Roger's obvious hostile "take over" by trying to trick people into thinking Bcash is the real Bitcoin by utilizing the Bitcoin name, Bitcoin.com domain (which Satoshi deemed "not official" from the beginning) and continuously trying to tie Satoshi's vision to Bcash's vision when in reality if you read the white paper that's purely up for personal interpretation. That in itself is why Bcash will never be the real Bitcoin. I can 100% gaurantee that.

Bcash has cut off it's own nose to spite it's face.

And Roger is definitely greedy lol, you've never heard him talk on youtube? He rubbed the "self-made millionaire" thing in everyones faces so much it's hard not to see him as anything but greedy & egotistical. It's his demeanor... his body language... the way he talks down to others instead of making a coherent argument... he's an obvious psychopath.
Nobody owns the Bitcoin name, is called decentralization and Bitcoin Cash is a fork of Bitcoin, not an altcoin so it makes sense use the Bitcoin name.
jr. member
Activity: 36
Merit: 1
Bitcoin Trash {aka BCash} is going to fail soon. Anyone with a bit of knowledge on how scaling works and how limited

Blockchain upgrades are, will tell you that it is going to fail in the near future. Roger Ver must be paying you a lot of money to

come to a Bitcoin {BTC} forum, to promote your Shitcoin. SegWit & Lightning network will sweep the floor with BCash and

even Roger Ver acknowledged that BCash will need to incorporate it as a scaling solution for it's scaling problems in the

future.  Grin Grin

You supporting this guy? ---> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCOjCEth6xI
Roger Ver helped Bitcoin Legacy before helping Bitcoin Cash. Can we stop with that ad hominems?
Bitcoin Cash have not any scaling problem, it was solved with 8mb blocks. Centralizes networks like tipprbot or Lighning Network are safer on Bitcoin Cash because Segwit make 0 confirms transactions less secure!

Post the number of transaction Bcash does. I'll wait.
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 260
Bitcoin SV is Bitcoin
Bitcoin Trash {aka BCash} is going to fail soon. Anyone with a bit of knowledge on how scaling works and how limited

Blockchain upgrades are, will tell you that it is going to fail in the near future. Roger Ver must be paying you a lot of money to

come to a Bitcoin {BTC} forum, to promote your Shitcoin. SegWit & Lightning network will sweep the floor with BCash and

even Roger Ver acknowledged that BCash will need to incorporate it as a scaling solution for it's scaling problems in the

future.  Grin Grin

You supporting this guy? ---> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCOjCEth6xI
Roger Ver helped Bitcoin Legacy before helping Bitcoin Cash. Can we stop with that ad hominems?
Bitcoin Cash have not any scaling problem, it was solved with 8mb blocks. Centralizes networks like tipprbot or Lighning Network are safer on Bitcoin Cash because Segwit make 0 confirms transactions less secure!
jr. member
Activity: 36
Merit: 1
Sorry sir, what you try to say here ? your post tittle sound confusing, and i allready read that bitcoin whitepaper long time ago when im still in highschool

I dont even try to read the whitepaper but i have felt that bitcoin is the best one.
However i also confuse what the op try to say.

Try to do a 15$ transaction with BTC, then try to do a 15$ transaction with BCH. After this experiment you will no longer feel Bitcoin is the best one but a doomed non-currency.


By your logic DOGE is better the Bcash. If cheaper transactions are your concern now why not use something even cheaper?

Or is that your concern? You seem threatened.
Why not use paypal?

Thank you! Archived!
jr. member
Activity: 36
Merit: 1
the thing you will continue to fail to understand is that 1 MB being bad, mempool being big, fees being high, and 1000 other things will never make bitcoin cash a good thing.

it is still a centralized fork controlled by a certain group of people with lots of money and mining power who chose "8 MB" instead of a more logical approach to pump it easier while making it impossible to spam attack it while they are pumping it for about a year. and meanwhile bitcoin blockchain with 1 MB blocks is still 20 GB bigger than BCH blockchain!!!
Bitcoin Cash have more than 6 independent developer teams while Bitcoin Legacy just have the Core developers paid by Blockstream(very close to bankers).
I already explained why  Bitcoin Cash is decentralized but the problem is you guys are angry because your portfolio/wealth is threatened by Bitcoin Cash. You don't care about decentralization. Be honest.

What Github are you looking at? LOL
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 260
Bitcoin SV is Bitcoin
Sorry sir, what you try to say here ? your post tittle sound confusing, and i allready read that bitcoin whitepaper long time ago when im still in highschool

I dont even try to read the whitepaper but i have felt that bitcoin is the best one.
However i also confuse what the op try to say.

Try to do a 15$ transaction with BTC, then try to do a 15$ transaction with BCH. After this experiment you will no longer feel Bitcoin is the best one but a doomed non-currency.


By your logic DOGE is better the Bcash. If cheaper transactions are your concern now why not use something even cheaper?

Or is that your concern? You seem threatened.
Why not use paypal?
jr. member
Activity: 36
Merit: 1
Sorry sir, what you try to say here ? your post tittle sound confusing, and i allready read that bitcoin whitepaper long time ago when im still in highschool

I dont even try to read the whitepaper but i have felt that bitcoin is the best one.
However i also confuse what the op try to say.

Try to do a 15$ transaction with BTC, then try to do a 15$ transaction with BCH. After this experiment you will no longer feel Bitcoin is the best one but a doomed non-currency.


By your logic DOGE is better the Bcash. If cheaper transactions are your concern now why not use something even cheaper?

Or is that your concern? You seem threatened.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1293
There is trouble abrewing
the thing you will continue to fail to understand is that 1 MB being bad, mempool being big, fees being high, and 1000 other things will never make bitcoin cash a good thing.

it is still a centralized fork controlled by a certain group of people with lots of money and mining power who chose "8 MB" instead of a more logical approach to pump it easier while making it impossible to spam attack it while they are pumping it for about a year. and meanwhile bitcoin blockchain with 1 MB blocks is still 20 GB bigger than BCH blockchain!!!
Bitcoin Cash have more than 6 independent developer teams while Bitcoin Legacy just have the Core developers paid by Blockstream(very close to bankers).
I already explained why  Bitcoin Cash is decentralized but the problem is you guys are angry because your portfolio/wealth is threatened by Bitcoin Cash. You don't care about decentralization. Be honest.

fuck blockstream and any bitcoin core developer that is being paid by them. but that still doesn't make bitcoin cash any better.

also my portfolio/wealth was increased tremendously thanks to bitcoin cash, but that too doesn't make bitcoin cash good.
legendary
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1074
Bitcoin Trash {aka BCash} is going to fail soon. Anyone with a bit of knowledge on how scaling works and how limited

Blockchain upgrades are, will tell you that it is going to fail in the near future. Roger Ver must be paying you a lot of money to

come to a Bitcoin {BTC} forum, to promote your Shitcoin. SegWit & Lightning network will sweep the floor with BCash and

even Roger Ver acknowledged that BCash will need to incorporate it as a scaling solution for it's scaling problems in the

future.  Grin Grin

You supporting this guy? ---> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCOjCEth6xI
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 260
Bitcoin SV is Bitcoin
the thing you will continue to fail to understand is that 1 MB being bad, mempool being big, fees being high, and 1000 other things will never make bitcoin cash a good thing.

it is still a centralized fork controlled by a certain group of people with lots of money and mining power who chose "8 MB" instead of a more logical approach to pump it easier while making it impossible to spam attack it while they are pumping it for about a year. and meanwhile bitcoin blockchain with 1 MB blocks is still 20 GB bigger than BCH blockchain!!!
Bitcoin Cash have more than 6 independent developer teams while Bitcoin Legacy just have the Core developers paid by Blockstream(very close to bankers).
I already explained why  Bitcoin Cash is decentralized but the problem is you guys are angry because your portfolio/wealth is threatened by Bitcoin Cash. You don't care about decentralization. Be honest.
legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1293
There is trouble abrewing
the thing you will continue to fail to understand is that 1 MB being bad, mempool being big, fees being high, and 1000 other things will never make bitcoin cash a good thing.

it is still a centralized fork controlled by a certain group of people with lots of money and mining power who chose "8 MB" instead of a more logical approach to pump it easier while making it impossible to spam attack it while they are pumping it for about a year. and meanwhile bitcoin blockchain with 1 MB blocks is still 20 GB bigger than BCH blockchain!!!
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 260
Bitcoin SV is Bitcoin
Sell your #BitcoinLegacy on CoinEX and get 5,31 Bitcoin (cash) !
https://www.coinex.com/
sr. member
Activity: 378
Merit: 260
Bitcoin SV is Bitcoin
BCH have less trafic then BTC. when more trafic come BCH have problems like BTC...
Bitcoin (Cash) now have x8 BTC's blocksize so will need a x8 the amount of BTC's transactions to have similar problems but before it happens, the blocksize will be upgraded with a hardfork without bifurcation (next May. we have consensus) to 32mb = will be able to process x32 the amount of transactions that BTC can process and fees will be under 0.01$/transaction. Just what bitcoin used to be before Blockstream (aka Block the Stream) started blocking the Blocksize.

but this is no good solution. if more trafic come you hard fork again to 64? 128? hard fork is bad not good to do it every 1-2 year. also x64 block or more big will make blockchain very big and people not can put it in them computer.
Yes the idea is keep making blocks bigger untill billions of transactions can be processed every day. 1GB blocks has already been mined on the testnet successfully. Hardforks are not bad and with consensus don't produce a bifurcation, last october Bitcoin Cash did a hardfork to change the DAA (Dificulty adjustment algorithm) and no problem happened. The only ones who need to save a copy of the blockchain on their computers are nodes, people using Bitcoin Cash as a currency don't need to became a node and in fact nodes are the less relevant part of the network. 20 years ago 1mb /block could have look like a big deal but tecnology evolves very fast and Satoshi had this in mind. Now there are 1-5 TeraByte hard drives. Every year 1 terabyte will be cheaper and in the future send a HD movie will not become a big deal.
Pages:
Jump to: