Topic: who are they behind ico? (Read 16356 times)
I believe the top ranking team members are in charge especially the CEO(Chief Executive Officer) and COO( Chief Operating Officer). Except in a case where third parties like KickICO, Latoken etc are involved
maybe this is not important, there is no benefit to this question. but I am very curious about who is the top person behind ico?
So like this, bounty hunters work in the field of project promotion, I assume we are at the root. while the team and developers manage the project to keep running, including finding funds from investors. the question is, who is the top in the ico project? say like bitcoin "he is the top of the other coins, even the creator of bitcoin doesn't receive the slightest profit from his own creations.
Bitcoin is different from case of coins / other projects bro, history of bitcoin you certainly know, but for projects after that real individuals, groups and companies intentionally follow blockchain technology such as bitcoin. the highest person in ico? ... it's clear that the developers on each project are the highest. So like this, bounty hunters work in the field of project promotion, I assume we are at the root. while the team and developers manage the project to keep running, including finding funds from investors. the question is, who is the top in the ico project? say like bitcoin "he is the top of the other coins, even the creator of bitcoin doesn't receive the slightest profit from his own creations.
I am deeply convinced that developers always have to go through the identification procedure, they get our money, and we want and have the right to know who they are.
just as bitcoin creators themselves do not want their authenticity to be known by all among those who are involved in the crypto world, I think ICO projects are also the same. they only make the team able to develop projects that they want to create and think about going forward.
so until now, we all don't know who is the main person behind the ICO and we only know the development teams that have been recorded on the whitepaper.
so until now, we all don't know who is the main person behind the ICO and we only know the development teams that have been recorded on the whitepaper.
In ICO everyone has a great impact through the successful if any project. My believe is that without investors there will be no fund to carry out most of the project.
maybe this is not important, there is no benefit to this question. but I am very curious about who is the top person behind ico?
So like this, bounty hunters work in the field of project promotion, I assume we are at the root. while the team and developers manage the project to keep running, including finding funds from investors. the question is, who is the top in the ico project? say like bitcoin "he is the top of the other coins, even the creator of bitcoin doesn't receive the slightest profit from his own creations.
So like this, bounty hunters work in the field of project promotion, I assume we are at the root. while the team and developers manage the project to keep running, including finding funds from investors. the question is, who is the top in the ico project? say like bitcoin "he is the top of the other coins, even the creator of bitcoin doesn't receive the slightest profit from his own creations.
I am very aware that a bounty hunter like me is the person who is at the bottom of a project and I think the top person is the CEO but even so it does not mean that the most profitable is the CEO because sometimes investors can dominate more depending on the funds they gave the project because the project itself usually only held 30% of the total supply of coins and that was shared with all the teams working there
there are some speculation I think about who they are behind ICO.
First I thought they were one of the Bounty Hunter who also wanted to try their luck by making ICO itself.
The Second is that I think they are Bounty managers who try to invest and imitate the concepts of projects that have been completed.
and The Third is I think they are innovators who try their luck, raise funds with a new concept of ICO / ITO that aims to develop their business.
First I thought they were one of the Bounty Hunter who also wanted to try their luck by making ICO itself.
The Second is that I think they are Bounty managers who try to invest and imitate the concepts of projects that have been completed.
and The Third is I think they are innovators who try their luck, raise funds with a new concept of ICO / ITO that aims to develop their business.
maybe this is not important, there is no benefit to this question. but I am very curious about who is the top person behind ico?
So like this, bounty hunters work in the field of project promotion, I assume we are at the root. while the team and developers manage the project to keep running, including finding funds from investors. the question is, who is the top in the ico project? say like bitcoin "he is the top of the other coins, even the creator of bitcoin doesn't receive the slightest profit from his own creations.
So like this, bounty hunters work in the field of project promotion, I assume we are at the root. while the team and developers manage the project to keep running, including finding funds from investors. the question is, who is the top in the ico project? say like bitcoin "he is the top of the other coins, even the creator of bitcoin doesn't receive the slightest profit from his own creations.
IICO is a mechanism for raising money to start a project
by dividing the project's capital into currencies or tokens and sold
to get the money needed to get started
in short, it is crowdfunding in the form of coins or tokens.
ICOs are not created by a single person, almost every ICO have new person behind, but now i think will not be so much people who will invest on, and we can't know who is behind a ICO.
The face of all ICOs belongs to buterim because most of the ICOs good and bad are on ethereum. For individual ICOs it is better to pick ones that have someone promoting it on youtube, instagram, and any live conferences
Maybe because he just started the term "smart contract" and that contract is being adopted by many cryptocurrencies that run based on their own Blockchain technology, such as EOS. I think yeah, the face of ICO is Vitalik, I wonder why other says it's magic, they are pertaining on the reviews on how the ICO is performing not really providing the answer on which or whom 'tops' the rank in ICOS and projects.
the one who first thinks of the idea and materialized it by building the team and roadmap and whitepaper, the head of the project should be knowledgeable about the platform that he is going to offer to the public and should be commensurate to his expertise, you cannot make a doctor build a platform about engineering.
Yes that is right. This is not a one person thing. ICOs have a whole management in their back and all of them work on different designations and positions to make sure the ICO is successful. So, it is only team and no one else. ICO actually help the startup companies raise money by conducting the token sale on their website so it is purely the management on the back. In case of IEO, there comes exchange as well.We may start forget how cruel people were scamming in the name of ICOs and even the same people are coming with the name of IEO as exchange operators are there as a protection layer to screw them in the case of they are still looking for scamming us.
I think the core team of an ICO project are in the top of it because they are the one that brought the ideas which investors intend to invest in it while bounty hunters use their skills, talents and time to promote it. All are important but the most important are the project team
I will tell you so every good project has its face. If you select Vitaly Buterin as the most famous person from the entire market, this person created one of the most popular cryptocurrencies and thus created a very strong crypto-community.
Every ICO have its CEO and this is the main person within their team. Like you always have a chief on your job and CEO is the chief of any ICO project in this industry. Maybe there are some models already where every team member is the part of a leading management as well.
The creator of bitcoin might not be the one who receives the most profit and the same is applicable to every other coin that is lunched. If the developer misuses his coij s by dumping them all and leaves. If this same coin remains in the crypto market and it is being traded on, whoever is the highest holder received the moist profit.
Although, if it is still at the ICO stage, it is the developer.
Although, if it is still at the ICO stage, it is the developer.
every ico has their own team. I don't think behind ico there is only 1 person.
and I see 90% of ico use the ethereum platform.
Team work is what really makes an ICO successful but if the OP is so much curious about the initiator, maybe he should do his further research to look out for the team leader and probably he might be the originator, but what we should be more concerned about is the project itself and its object, and also the thing involved in such project be it external body or internal body.and I see 90% of ico use the ethereum platform.
If the project has a very good working product and very sound and already successful intelligent team in place, then we have no fear of falling into the wrong project or being a victim of scam.
Bounty hunters are just like the deep part of the project, they like, follow, comment, subscribe, and much more things to do in the social media so guys I recommend you to not believing much of the audience of the project.
every ico has their own team. I don't think behind ico there is only 1 person.
and I see 90% of ico use the ethereum platform.
Team work is what really makes an ICO successful but if the OP is so much curious about the initiator, maybe he should do his further research to look out for the team leader and probably he might be the originator, but what we should be more concerned about is the project itself and its object, and also the thing involved in such project be it external body or internal body.and I see 90% of ico use the ethereum platform.
If the project has a very good working product and very sound and already successful intelligent team in place, then we have no fear of falling into the wrong project or being a victim of scam.
they are compose of teams and teams are consist of several people . they are usually professionals and bachellor of different degree's . their aim is either to provide a coin or a service that is really useful and has a unique feature aside from the existing cryptos that we see these days . or they were only builting fake projects just to scam inoscent people so that they can earn easy profits . ico nowadays are now doing bad , this might be the reason why ieo's were recently introduced .
Jump to: